User talk:Cinque stelle

Cinque stelle, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Cinque stelle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:34, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI report

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See Personal_attacks_by_Cinque_stelle. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 04:17, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruption in the context of not making positive contributions (as discussed on ANI). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 16:10, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Cinque stelle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If the editor took some time to read the talk page at Tenedos they'd see I have been a constructive presence there. My refactoring was always done in good faith following WP guidelines. Second, it takes two to tango in so called "battlegrounds"... I think an indefinite block is an overstep in this case, considering another editor didn't even find it worth a simple block.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=If the editor took some time to read the talk page at [[Tenedos]] they'd see I have been a constructive presence there.  My refactoring was always done in [[good faith]] following WP guidelines. Second, it takes two to tango in so called "battlegrounds"... I think an indefinite block is an overstep in this case, considering another editor didn't even find it worth a simple block. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=If the editor took some time to read the talk page at [[Tenedos]] they'd see I have been a constructive presence there.  My refactoring was always done in [[good faith]] following WP guidelines. Second, it takes two to tango in so called "battlegrounds"... I think an indefinite block is an overstep in this case, considering another editor didn't even find it worth a simple block. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=If the editor took some time to read the talk page at [[Tenedos]] they'd see I have been a constructive presence there.  My refactoring was always done in [[good faith]] following WP guidelines. Second, it takes two to tango in so called "battlegrounds"... I think an indefinite block is an overstep in this case, considering another editor didn't even find it worth a simple block. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

That editor was me. However, I was noting that you were very close to a block, not that you were free of Dr. K's concerns, and that you were at the very limit - the blocking admin just thought slightly more differently than I. Refactoring comments, good faith or not, is never a good thing to do and is contrary to guidelines. Concerning a "battleground", comments like this edit summary are what we consider WP:BATTLEGROUND.--Jasper Deng (talk) 18:01, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair, though I followed WP:REFACTOR to "improve the clarity and readability of the page" and for no other purpose. Refactoring can indeed be a "good thing to do" if done to improve the page, as was my intention.Cinque stelle (talk) 18:33, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]