User talk:Theaherna1706

Your edits to Tosca and La bohème

Wikipedia is a collaborative work. It is very important that you communicate with other editors and discuss changes to articles which your fellow editors have found unsuitable. You do this by participating at the talk pages of the articles you are editing. As another editor has told you, "on Wikipedia we talk things out when there's disagreement, we do not unilaterally try to impose a preferred version." You have now been edit-warring both under anonymous IPs and with this newly registered name for 3 weeks. Multiple editors have reverted your additions and explained why in the edit summaries and on the article talk pages. Please take your concerns to the talk pages of the articles in question and discuss them. The Bocelli recording you have repeatedly inserted into Tosca was not commended at all in the source given. Please do not use false references or hijack references for other parts of the article to make look as if they support your assertions. Most importantly, your edits have completely destroyed the formatting of the Tosca discography in your attempt to list a pirate recording there. This is the seventh time you have done this. Please revert your edits, read why the addition of pirate recordings is inappropriate at Talk:Tosca discography, and discuss there if you disagree.

Please also read WP:Edit warring (why edit-warring is not allowed on Wikipedia) and WP:Sock puppetry (why your use of multiple accounts and IPs to edit war or attempt to avoid scrutiny is not allowed). WP:TALK explains how to participate at talk pages and why it is crucial for your success as an editor. If you have any connection whatsoever with the artists and/or pirate record companies you are adding to Wikipedia, please read WP:Conflict of interest for guidance. We look foward to your cooperation. Voceditenore (talk) 15:16, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Tosca discography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Voceditenore (talk) 18:13, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Theaherna1706, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Theaherna1706! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:46, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add bootleg/illegal recordings to recordings sections and discographies

Please add only commercial recordings, commercial historical labels, e.g. Naxos Historical, Opera d'Oro, Myto, Testament Records, or Marston Records, and live recordings released and sold by opera companies and/or broadcasting companies themselves. Do not add recordings with the "labels": Live Opera, Celestial Audio, Premiere Opera (and its earlier version Legato Classics), Live Opera Heaven, and House of Opera. They are not record labels. They are private bootleg companies that produce on demand copies of off-air recordings and others taped by private individuals during actual performances. Virtually all of them are copyright violations. All such additions should be promptly removed. Your persistance in adding and re-adding these types of recordings when multiple editors have reverted you, and your failure to engage in dicussions on the talk pages or here has become extremely disruptive. Voceditenore (talk) 04:59, 30 September 2012 (UTC)