Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tris Wilson (talk | contribs) at 02:21, 28 November 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rollback

(add requestview requests)


I've reverted a lot of vandalism in my day, and I believe I have demonstrated my ability to revert with appropriate care and dedication to merit the trust implicit in granting my request. Sjb0926 (talk) 18:34, 23 September 2011 (UTC) Sjb0926 (talk) 17:55, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 18:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Sjb0926 (talk) 01:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My alternate account for public computers. Not sure what policy is regarding accepting these, but if it's okay for me to have my rights copied over, I'd like it. Thanks! gwickwire | Leave a message 03:38, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneTom Morris (talk) 17:13, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm contributing on many film articles at the moment, and many of the blockbuster film articles are prone to vandalism. Many attacks come in series of edits which can only be undone manually and individually, without the rollback tool. Undoing multiple edits manually is tiresome, and sometimes sneaky vandalism slip through, so I want to be able to rollback without relying on other users. Anthonydraco (talk) 06:10, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:01, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I often remove vandalism from my own choice of articles. However it gets fussy when you have to go back to the old revision and remove vandalism by copy-paste. So this feature will help me a lot. Months back I requested for this feature but my request was declined as I was not yet qualified for it. So I followed every instruction provided by my fellow Wikipedians using this feature and I think I have shown my ability to remove vandalism from articles with care. Please consider (and sorry for any mistake I may have committed unknowingly). Thank you so much. Tamravidhir (Jiva is Shiva!) 06:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:02, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't revert vandalism a whole lot but I would like for my occasional reverts to be consistent and I think some specialised tools would help. Right now I do most of those things manually. Stalwart111 05:39, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Mifter (talk) 00:01, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For quick vandalism removal, as well as quick removal of unsourced content and other additions not adhering to other Wikipedia policies — JJJ (talk) 05:57, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Mifter (talk) 00:12, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have been on Wikipedia for quite a long time so I know what to do Englandtransport (talk) 07:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - As of now you only have 55 edits and no history of fighting vandalism. I would recommend using Twinkle for a while to starting fighting vandalism to gain experience and then reapplying at sometime in the future. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me. Best, Mifter (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just having gotten unblocked, am seeking reinstatement of my rollback rights. See contributions for track record. —Mythdon (talk contribs) 21:44, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of my edits are vandalism reverts, and I'd like the rollback permission to add on to what I can do with Twinkle (and use STiki). Fox Wilson (talk) 02:21, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]