Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects
 | This page contains requests for new redirects made through the Articles for Creation process. Anything that is not a redirect request will be automatically declined or removed. Please note:
Your request should be reviewed soon. You might like to check back here later to see if the request has been fulfilled. Or, if you have an account, you can add this page to your watchlist and then remove it from your watchlist after all of your changes have been reviewed. Requests are archived one day after being reviewed. If you do not see your request, check the box to the right to see if it has been archived. |
|
2008-2018 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 2 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
 | If this page has been recently modified, it may not reflect the most recent changes. Please purge this page to view the most recent changes. |
 This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Target of redirect: Empire Interactive Reason: Because Xplosiv is already included in the Empire Interactive article. Source (if applicable): 76.89.229.250 (talk) 04:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: [[ ]]
 This request has been declined. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Target of redirect: [[ ]] Reason: Source (if applicable): 107.197.178.70 (talk) 08:20, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: [[ ]]
| This request has been declined. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Target of redirect: [[ ]] Reason: Source (if applicable): 107.197.178.70 (talk) 08:20, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: [[ ]]
| This request has been declined. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Target of redirect: [[ ]]mr.jones smith Reason: he killed my family Source (if applicable): 107.197.178.70 (talk) 08:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Category request: person:
| This request has been declined. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
[[File:Braj bhushan singh|thumbnail|me] </gallery> n1 File:Example.jpg|Caption2 </gallery> Parent category/categories:
Braj.bhushansingh (talk) 09:40, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Cheese Dutch
| This request has been declined. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Something shown in wimpy of a kid..(Movie)...the cheese is 2o millions of years ago and when a kid touches that they get cheese dutch..then no one talk to him/her...then they have to touch someone to pass the cheese dutch from their body....and then one day the wimpy kids best friend was forced to eat the cheese and he got cheese dutch...but the wimpy kid said that he was the one who ate the cheese and they bilieved him and never touched him.....THATS ALL....
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: [[ ]]
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Target of redirect: Revolute_joint Reason: "Pin joint" is a common name for the "Revolute joint," as noted in the first sentence of the redirect article. Pin joint was a requested article, but the information already exists under revolute joint. I believe pin joint is a more common term, and one that is a likely target of searches. Source (if applicable): Pygmy goat (talk) 20:36, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs with the pop-punk chord progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): JPaestpreornJeolhlna (talk) 00:18, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs with the pop-punk progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): JPaestpreornJeolhlna (talk) 00:19, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs containing the pop-punk progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): JPaestpreornJeolhlna (talk) 00:19, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs with the doo-wop progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): JPaestpreornJeolhlna (talk) 00:20, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs containing the doo-wop progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): JPaestpreornJeolhlna (talk) 00:20, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs with the doo-wop chord progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): JPaestpreornJeolhlna (talk) 00:20, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs containing the doo-wop chord progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): JPaestpreornJeolhlna (talk) 00:20, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs with the 50s progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): JPaestpreornJeolhlna (talk) 00:20, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs containing the 50s chord progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): JPaestpreornJeolhlna (talk) 00:20, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs with the 50s chord progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): JPaestpreornJeolhlna (talk) 00:20, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of four chords songs
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Alternative name; "Four chords" is already a redirect to the article "Pop-punk chord progression" Source (if applicable): JPaestpreornJeolhlna (talk) 00:59, 25 December 2012 (UTC) |
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: Who wrote the Bible?, Who wrote the bible?, Who wrote the Bible and Who wrote the bible
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: cf. also Who Wrote the Bible Source (if applicable): 91.12.157.181 (talk) 02:28, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of doo-wop songs
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: "Doo-wop" is a common term referring to songs with the 50s progression (I-vi-IV-V). Source (if applicable): JPaestpreornJeolhlna (talk) 02:28, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of four-chord songs
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: "List of four chords songs" is an existing redirect to this page; this phrase may be searched as an alternative. Source (if applicable): JPaestpreornJeolhlna (talk) 02:33, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of four chord songs
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: "List of four chords songs" is an existing redirect to this page. Source (if applicable): JPaestpreornJeolhlna (talk) 02:34, 25 December 2012 (UTC) |
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of four-chords songs
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Alternate name of subject Source (if applicable): JPaestpreornJeolhlna (talk) 02:56, 25 December 2012 (UTC) |
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: Journey 1
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: complements the redirect Journey 2, and clearly lets users who want to know what the first movie in the series is to access directly. As the second film is "Journey 2", the then access via the numerical Journey 1 is a likely search term. Source (if applicable): 70.24.247.127 (talk) 03:43, 25 December 2012 (UTC) |
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs in the 50s progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): 24.44.73.222 (talk) 05:20, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs in the 50s chord progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): 24.44.73.222 (talk) 05:23, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs in the doo-wop chord progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): 24.44.73.222 (talk) 05:24, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs in the doo-wop progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): 24.44.73.222 (talk) 05:25, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs in the pop-punk progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): 24.44.73.222 (talk) 05:26, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of songs in the pop-punk chord progression
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Closely related words Source (if applicable): 24.44.73.222 (talk) 05:27, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of doo wop songs
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Alternative name of subject; mistake of absence of hyphen in "doo-wop" Source (if applicable): 24.44.73.222 (talk) 05:30, 25 December 2012 (UTC) |
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of 4-chord songs
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: "Four Chords" is an existing redirect to the article "Pop-punk chord progression"; it is also a common term to mean this chord progression in songs. Source (if applicable): 24.44.73.222 (talk) 05:36, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of 4-chords songs
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: "Four Chords" is an existing redirect to the article "Pop-punk chord progression"; it is also a common term to mean this chord progression in songs. Source (if applicable): 24.44.73.222 (talk) 05:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of 4 chords songs
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: "Four Chords" is an existing redirect to the article "Pop-punk chord progression"; it is also a common term to mean this chord progression in songs. Source (if applicable): 24.44.73.222 (talk) 05:38, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: List of 4 chord songs
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: "Four Chords" is an existing redirect to the article "Pop-punk chord progression"; it is also a common term to mean this chord progression in songs. Source (if applicable): 24.44.73.222 (talk) 05:38, 25 December 2012 (UTC) |
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: Canadarm1 & Canadarm 1
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: {{R from alternate name}} per the article "Canadarm1" form in relation to the successor Canadarm2 without space naming. "Canadarm 1" form per more normal spacing in English. Source (if applicable): 70.24.247.127 (talk) 06:53, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: Canada Hand
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: {{R from alternate name}} per the article Source (if applicable): 70.24.247.127 (talk) 06:56, 25 December 2012 (UTC) |
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: [[ ]]
| This request has been declined. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Target of redirect: [[ ]] Reason: Source (if applicable): 180.94.80.242 (talk) 09:06, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: Raul Menendez Josefina Menendez David "Section" Mason
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Target of redirect: Call of Duty: Black Ops II Reason: Source (if applicable): [1] [2] 112.210.124.58 (talk) 12:29, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: L.m.f.a.o. L.m.f.a.O. L.M.F.A.O.
| This request has been declined. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Target of redirect: LMFAO Reason: Source (if applicable): 112.210.52.50 (talk) 12:40, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Brittany Snow
| This request has been declined. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
{{Infobox person | name = Brittany Snow | image = Brittany Snow.jpg | caption = Snow at the 2009 [[Heart Truth]] fashion show | birthname = Brittany Anne Snow | birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1986|3|9}} | birth_place = [[Tampa, Florida]], [[United States]] | occupation = Actress, Singer | years_active = 1995–present '''Brittany Anne Snow''' (born March 9, 1986)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: Garbage-in-garbage-out
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: Sae Sok O-Gye
| This request has been declined. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Target of redirect: Se Sok O-Gye Reason: The page which currently exists is WRONG according to accepted Romanization standards. SAE would be 새 in Korean Hangeul, and the word used in the item discussed is 세 (세속오계). Therefore the only logical thing to do is to RENAME the existing page and to create a redirect for the erroneous title currently employed. Source (if applicable): Just read the info on the page in question. 186.32.185.99 (talk) 22:02, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Shanti kumari
| This request has been declined. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Target of redirect: [[ ]] Reason: Source (if applicable): 69.177.200.56 (talk) 23:45, 25 December 2012 (UTC) |
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: NaCp
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Target of redirect: sodium cyclopentadienide Reason: R from other name Source (if applicable): 12.197.200.130 (talk) 01:27, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: SRFD
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Abbreviation Source (if applicable): Weihang7 (talk) 04:39, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: [[ ]]TOPICAL ANTIBIOTICS
| This request has been declined. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Target of redirect: [[ ]] Reason: Source (if applicable): Sirisha songa (talk) 04:49, 26 December 2012 (UTC) TOPICAL ANTIBIOTICS More studies are indicating that we should use old drugs for new bugs. The “newer drugs” have grown increasingly resistant due to over-prescribing Here goes: The four most effective, least resistant ophthalmic medicines to treat the two most common ocular pathogens—Staph. aureus and Staph. epidermidis—are gentamicin, trimethoprim with polymyxin B, besifloxacin, and vancomycin.1-4,Gentamicin and trimethoprim with polymyxin B are generically available. Besifloxacin is a chlorofluoroquinolone,and vancomycin (as an eyedrop) has to be compounded. Note that fluoroquinolones are not on the list! We’ve known this to be the case for several years now. Furthermore,excellent drugs against Pseudomonas are the fluoroquinolones,the aminoglycosides, and polymyxin B. Unless a patient gives evidence(or history) of mucopurulent discharge, or unless there is a true threat to the cornea, the use of a topical antibiotic is usually of no clinical value. We have had the opportunity to see many hundreds of “red eyes” over the years. A hefty proportion of these have been treated elsewhere and have not gotten better. The reason: They have some variety of inflammatory eye condition that invariably responds to the steroid we prescribe…and we gain a new patient to our practice. There are two things we wish primary care physicians understood: • If there is no discharge, the eye is not infected. • If there is sector injection to theconjunctiva (i.e., episcleritis, etc.),the eye is not infected Knowledge of these two concepts could save thousands of patients therapeutic misadventures every year.
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: Batavia Giants
| This request has been accepted. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
|
Reason: Former team name, Batavia Muckdogs is current name. Source (if applicable): 74.67.152.140 (talk) 05:16, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
Redirect request: [[ ]]TOPICAL ANTIBIOTICS
Target of redirect: [[ ]]spelling
Reason: drugs
Source (if applicable):
Sirisha songa (talk) 06:43, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
TOPICAL ANTIBIOTICS
More studies are indicating that we should use old drugs for new bugs. The “newer drugs” have grown increasingly resistant due to over-prescribing Here goes: The four most effective, least resistant ophthalmic medicines to treat the two most common ocular pathogens—Staph. aureus and Staph. epidermidis—are gentamicin, trimethoprim with polymyxin B, besifloxacin, and vancomycin.1-4,Gentamicin and trimethoprim with polymyxin B are generically available. Besifloxacin is a chlorofluoroquinolone,and vancomycin (as an eyedrop) has to be compounded. Note that fluoroquinolones are not on the list! We’ve known this to be the case for several years now. Furthermore,excellent drugs against Pseudomonas are the fluoroquinolones,the aminoglycosides, and polymyxin B. Unless a patient gives evidence(or history) of mucopurulent discharge, or unless there is a true threat to the cornea, the use of a topical antibiotic is usually of no clinical value. We have had the opportunity to see many hundreds of “red eyes” over the years. A hefty proportion of these have been treated elsewhere and have not gotten better. The reason: They have some variety of inflammatory eye condition that invariably responds to the steroid we prescribe…and we gain a new patient to our practice. There are two things we wish primary care physicians understood: • If there is no discharge, the eye is not infected. • If there is sector injection to theconjunctiva (i.e., episcleritis, etc.),the eye is not infected Knowledge of these two concepts could save thousands of patients therapeutic misadventures every year.
Redirect request: [[ ]]
Target of redirect: [[ ]]
Reason:
Source (if applicable):
119.235.53.229 (talk) 07:44, 26 December 2012 (UTC) you know dirty fellow