User talk:AmandaNP
| Wikipedia:Babel | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Search user languages |
User:DeltaQuad/Menu
User:DeltaQuad/StatusTemplate
User:DeltaQuad/Templates/Off and On WikiBreak
Contact information
|
|---|
|
Hey, DQ, I'm wondering if User:Hell in a Bucket's good faith tagging after the completion of the investigation is correct. I almost undid them myself, but, just to be sure, I figured I'd ask you. I believe only the user pages of Croonerman and 301bNYC should be tagged, and there's no reason to remove the talk page history of either account. Is that right? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- (tps) I undid those. Socks' user talk pages are sometimes blanked and/or redirected to the user, but sockmasters' talk pages usually aren't, and sock tags belong on user pages rather than talk. —DoRD (talk) 15:58, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. Shouldn't Croonerman's user page be tagged?--Bbb23 (talk) 16:43, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay in responding. Distractions are distracting. If indef'd I'd say yes, tag it, otherwise no. So since he's indef'd i've tagged him. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 10:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Good, thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay in responding. Distractions are distracting. If indef'd I'd say yes, tag it, otherwise no. So since he's indef'd i've tagged him. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 10:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. Shouldn't Croonerman's user page be tagged?--Bbb23 (talk) 16:43, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Meatpuppet
According to WP:MEAT "For the purpose of dispute resolution when there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sockpuppets or several users with similar editing habits they may be treated as one user with sockpuppets.[1] You wrote on the SPI case page that Tariqmia was probably a meatpuppet, since Aminul802 was blocked this guy is back and supporting Aminul802 edits[2] What should be done regarding this? If as suspected this is a meatpuppet then he will proxy edits for the blocked user. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:58, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- For reasons I can't comment on I honestly doubt that will be much of an issue. If he does continue to edit in the same areas and related subjects as our sock, drop me a note, i'll run a second check and see if there is a stronger relation and consider blocks then per either the sock or meat policy. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 22:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- OK mate, thanks. Darkness Shines (talk) 22:34, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
About topic ban of Greek-Turkish relations
Hi DeltaQuad! Firstly,put the topic ban and after close the negotiation,will not change anything.Have you received my statement in this regard? Or about this topic, did you contact me? Also,Have you seen contributions claimant Dr.K._? Unfortunately,none of this happened. I don't recognize this decision !! Maurice (talk) 00:00, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hello, I did not individually contact you, but you were notified of the thread here, and were given a chance for a statement. Regarding Dr. K., this is about you, not him, if you have an issue with him you can file your own request, as that is your right to. And I'm sorry you don't recognize this decision, but under a ruling from the the Arbitration Committee authorizes me and other administrators to issue these topic bans, and block you if you do not follow them. Your excessive edit warring at bot-like speeds is definitely an issue and why the restriction is imposed. If you have any questions I'll be happy to answer them as best as I can. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 01:03, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Admin's Barnstar |
| For clearing the massive backlog at WP:RFPP. Thank you as well for everything you do for Wikipedia. It really makes a difference. Vacation9 02:28, 14 January 2013 (UTC) |
Can you re-look at the above relating only to Jakejr, there are clear similarities relating to the AfD behaviour and the fact the account became active again about the time JBJ got blocked. ✍ Mtking ✉ 04:10, 14 January 2013 (UTC)