User talk:Lugia2453

This is Lugia2453's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

You reverted my edits on Haiti

I added some text to the article on Haiti that said Haiti was the shittiest country on earth and I called the Haitian people lazy, you reverted my edit.

Why did you revert my edit?

216.149.187.98 (talk) 23:33, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Your comment should speak for itself. What sort of question is that?Frigid Ninja 00:10, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	ur cool Rossrocker09 (talk) 22:26, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Page

I had blanked a page that I created a few years ago for a charity that is no longer performing it's mission and is no longer a registered charity. You reverted the changes. I edited the page again, please consider the deletion. Special Kindness In Packages, Inc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sspoerke (talk • contribs) 23:13, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not creating vandalism

You're damaging the english language by allowing a Neologist, incorrect term appear on a popular website when a more correct term already exists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt606 (talk • contribs) 21:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Submission

Can you review this article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Michael_Williams_(American_football) I added a few things to it. 173.78.231.251 (talk) 02:56, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't me!

Whatever you said I did, it wasn't me. I've never been on the page you refer to before! 78.147.48.156 (talk) 19:34, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another Submission

I can you review this article here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Rodney_Smith_(American_football) I added some more information to the article. 173.78.231.251 (talk) 22:30, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Can you also take a look at this one also. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Dwayne_Beckford I added a couple of citations to it. 173.78.231.251 (talk) 23:12, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Toscano (cigar), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferdinand III (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article

I have a article here for review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Damion_Square and I don't know what the Template loop detected: Template:AFC submission means. I tried to remove from there but I just didn't know what it was for. 173.78.231.251 (talk) 20:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave it up

The thing about Dr. Parry Graham is something that pertains to our school, and it is not spam. Please stop taking it down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpg2016 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tavakoli

I've moved Tavakoli's comment to her talk page. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 21:56, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis Housden

Based upon this diff and my initial WP:BEFORE of the person which netted a facebook page and a twitter page. I give it a chance if I find a seemingly possibility of there being an assertion of notability but my findings were strong evidence to the contrary. Mkdw ^talk 22:49, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I took this editors history at techno bass into consideration too when I first visited the talk page. Mkdw ^talk 22:52, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article

I got another article for review. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Travis_Long I thought it was good I put the sources that I can find but I guess it was something else. 173.78.231.251 (talk) 00:44, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wow

That was some VERY quick vandalism reverting you did on my user talk page. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 21:37, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. --bonadea contributions talk 22:04, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. kashmiri 09:15, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

hello. why do you take my editing away? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.95.106 (talk) 21:49, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They're not helpful or constructive. Do you really think something like "I have have flown to many different planets are you jealous is that you removed my last post, i am a buddhist sorcerer!" adds anything to a page about an Indian fragrance? It's not even on-topic. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:53, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my comments on South Hiendley, if you lived there you would understand how constructive they were.

why?

Dragonball Evolution edit

My entire point for criticism at the "Dragonball Evolution's" first paragraph was to point out those unaware of the Dragonball franchise that this movie was an inaccurate work, and that blame shouldn't be directed towards the original manga itself. It being constructive is besides the point; an actual fact that needed to be expressed was that the movie is nothing compared or related to the manga and anime. So, this is a command to you to immediately reset that edit; this edit will be restored to the expression that I previously rendered. It's a definite fact you will restore my written thoughts, so don't bother resisting this order. Hurry up, sonny...don't keep the internet waiting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.164.190.84 (talk) 22:09, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What you put in the article was the kind of comment that should be posted on the article's talk page and not on the article itself. If you want to make the comment, do it on the talk page. Also, you should sign your messages, which was automatically done by a bot because you didn't do so. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:12, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted Edit On Rebecca Lowe

You appear to be acting as judge and jury on edits added to Rebecca Lowes profile - edits which are all truthful. I'm instructing you to stop. You don't know the bitch and she has not ruined multiple relationships in your life. If the bitch wants publicity, she'll get the negative as well as the positive. Do not edit the posts without justification.

If you want to do some proper research, then add that Paul Buckle left his loyal wife and 2 children for her, that she has never been faithful in a relationship, that she lied about her age to get her first job, that she had no active interest in football until encouraged to join in the sport by an ex (guess who that is), that she has clear behavioral issues caused by her fathers unfaithfulness as a child, and thats just for starters. If you want to be all empowering, then do your research correctly and stop editing out the truth.

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You seem to be beating me to quite a few reverts. Keep up the good work! Ducknish (talk) 21:36, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why. I'm not vandalizing

Seriously, I do not believe my edits are constituting vandalism. Please respond to this matter

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Vidushisaraf (talk) 17:51, 12 March 2013 (UTC) Because this page hasn't been created for the purpose of advertisement. This is for an event which is being done by a Management institute iLEAD, kolkata (http://www.ilead.net.in/ Link for the institute) which is holding an event by the name Take the lead. There are other such events which are done by other management institutes listed under wikipedia. So i request you the please do not remove my article as every institute had the same rights.

Few events of other institute listed under wikipedia : Intaglio (Business School Summit) Confluence_(IIM_Ahmedabad) Revels (culfest) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vidushisaraf (talk • contribs) 18:11, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Port Talbot

As you were restoring the Peter Bush material, I was adding to / continuing an existing discussion at WP:EAR, here. I'm not sure I agree with your conclusion, but do want to make sure you know of the discussion so you can weigh in. I am not trying an end run! JohnInDC (talk) 21:40, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Hi Luigi,

Many thanks for agreeing with my comments on the notablity of Peter Bush for the town of Port Talbot, the other admin? has now created a community forum on it, I believe I have sourced enough non biased credable websites with referencing to show that he is indeed notable within Port Talbot and in fact within the UK, within his profession and professional memberships of institutions and is considered a leading person (why else would he be awarded an Honorary Doctorate) and also receive so many national awards (UK Based)as well as regional and local ones. Also being a Fellow of an Institute clearly shows incredible dedication and expertise in that field.

I think I should make an article which showcases him better and proves his notability although I was happy with him just being mentioned in the Port Talbot section. How would I go about making an article, although would have to get in touch with Peter first.

Many Thanks for your supportIttfellow (talk) 21:47, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest making an article and submitting it to Wikipedia:Articles for creation after you're done with it. I suggest Articles for creation because you can have experienced editors look at it and see if he's notable enough for an article. Also, please call me Lugia, not Luigi, since my username is Lugia2453. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:51, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Szekely land does not contain any valid references.

Hello Lugia. I modified that page as it does not present any correct references. All the information there is extracted from hungarian-biased sources and there is no reliable reference. This article is not objective at all and I can't believe it got published on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.97.81.44 (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replacing it with "KURTOS KALACS" isn't the way to go about doing that. It's vandalism, which is why I kept reverting it. Just remove the content and explain why you did it in your edit summary. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but nevertheless, as you verify what I am posting, you should verify the references. I will try to edit the article tomorrow but it is really disappointing that anyone can post these things here. The subject in question is strongly debated and citing references only from one side of a debate is biasing and misleading. (86.97.81.44 (talk) 21:28, 14 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]

The proper information was being provided by my majestic person

Can you at least inform me the reason why you injustly reverted my proper and most necessary adiitions? stop acting like a tyrant and butcher the proper person, you are incurring in an abuse of editing power and your inmoral actions move against the titanic right of freedom of speech and worldwide participation.

I move to execute all proper actions in order to remove this heathen person that opresses informative contributions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.35.79.55 (talk) 21:54, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So sorry.

My thirteen year old son got on my still logged-in account, and began vandalizing things, He's grounded, and I'll be more careful with my account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HaydenJAllen (talk • contribs) 22:21, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

You´re right brother, that was unconstructive, I thank you for your timely edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salsudoikari (talk • contribs) 22:41, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But you still agree

But you still agree that Natalie Morales is Hot and that Al and Matt and are two awesome dudes right? OceanBlue13 (talk) 21:25, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did not Vandalize Hoda page

Hoda is from Egypt. Her parents are Egyptian.OceanBlue13 (talk) 21:36, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive Edits to Filipino American

As this is a Hughes Net Satellite Internet connection, it is unfortunately a Broadly Shared IP, meaning that its users are distributed randomly throughout the globe. I have no idea who made the unconstructive edit to the Filipino American article, but I sincerely hope she or he will refrain from such activities in the future. I will do my best to revert any unconstructive edits as soon as they appear. I will glad to be of assistance in this regard. If this IP appears to make many unconstructive edits in the future please consider that there are thousands of users who would be unduly adversely affected by a restriction in editing privileges or other punitive measure. Thank you for your consideration.

sorry i "vandalised" but i dont know how to make a new page for it.

you removed the part about the sixth grader i know why but i didnt know how to make a new page for it sorry LUGGIA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.54.166 (talk) 21:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Make a new article at Wikipedia:Articles for creation and submit it there. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:53, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Can you review this article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Damion_Square 173.78.231.251 (talk) 05:04, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another Article

Can you look this article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Ja%27Gared_Davis 173.78.231.251 (talk) 00:46, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

taking down all my stuff

why are you taking down all of my edits? I'm just trying to contribute to the site — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.78.70.124 (talk) 20:41, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for being a vandal fighter.--I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 22:07, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another Submission

Can look at this article here? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Quanterus_Smith 173.78.231.251 (talk) 03:20, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmission

Hello Lugia2453. I modified my page and fell it in with many references, but only in Latvian language. In Latvia there are no sport web sites in english. Hope now you will accept my article: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Deniss Petrovs

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleksandra lv (talk • contribs) 22:59, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Submission Declined

Hi,

we created a page about HOPE'87, a charity and NGO working in the field of development and humanitarian aid...the article was rejected on Mar, 19th by you, because it was not supported by reliable sources/we didn't cite sources. But the thing is that we - the ones who wrote the article - are the NGO itself...isn't a link to our website enough of a source?? What other sources can we add??

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/HOPE%2787

--HOPE87 (talk) 16:06, 25 March 2013 (UTC)HOPE87[reply]

Updates to SearchHub wiki submission

Hi,

Thanks for reviewing my page.

I have read the "guidelines on the notability of websites" and the "golden rule"

As a consequence I have added citations to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject. Please see the first line "SearchHub is an open source search community site dedicated to supporting the Apache Lucene and Apache Solr communities launched on November 12, 2012.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]"

You also comment that "the majority of the given sources come from the subject itself" - Are the additional 5 citations above sufficient?

Thanks

Lewis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lewisfarrell (talk • contribs) 17:53, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi, it was only a very minor piece of information, don't really see how it wasn't constructive but wasn't a hugely important piece of information either. Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Impact33 (talk • contribs) 22:15, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey buddy I don't want any trouble. Can you please leave my page alone man, there is no vandalism on it and I added the signifigance of the page. Please don't mess with it, and like ReNock on facebook. — Preceding unsignedcomment added by Mr.mseda (talk • contribs) 23:36, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion

This article may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as an article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. See CSD A7.

If this article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page, and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message, explaining why you believe this article should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message.

Note that once tagged with this notice, the page may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation posted to the talk page is found to be insufficient.

Note to administrators: this article has content on its talk page which should be checked before deletion.

This page was last edited by Lugia2453 (contribs | logs) at 23:24 UTC (2 minutes ago)

Please consider placing the template: ==Speedy deletion nomination of ReNock9==

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ReNock9 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mr.mseda (talk) 23:38, 26 March 2013 (UTC) on the talk page of the author.[reply]

BMW F800GT article

Dear Lugia2453,

Thank you for publishing my first ever Wikipedia article so quickly! Less than 24 hours!

Kind regards --Duffs10 (talk) 01:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article

I got a article here for review. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Sheldon_Price 173.78.231.251 (talk) 14:04, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at 71.58.201.168's talk page

Hello! I noticed that you rolled an edit back by 71.58.201.168. You may want to take a look at what he/she changed your username to (LugiaLicksHerpes).... this person should be blocked for a while (they were just recently blocked, but still continue to make obnoxious, unconstructive edits). I've been monitoring them for a bit now, they're a large nuisance to Wikipedia. Thanks for your contributions! Endofskull (talk) 20:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IP Edits to Systems development life-cycle

The IP has made edits by placing more of his 'helpful tips' in the article, rather than on the talk page as I instructed him to do on my talk page. Just wanted to get a second opinion and see what you think should be done before I reverted them again. Thanks, Oddbodz (talk) 21:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps move the tips to the talk page off of the article, and message the IP about writing tips like these in the article's talk page. Don't just give the IP some generic warning about vandalism or whatever, because that's not what it is. Generic warnings aren't always the way to go in situations like this. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:12, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have moved the users comments, informed him of this and cancelled the template warnings on his talk page now I am aware they were good faith edits. Oddbodz (talk) 21:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fellow Legendary Pokemon....... that is all, Thank You. Giggity! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.230.86.122 (talk) 22:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/SiConnect

Hi there,

I've added loads of external references to the candidate SiConnect article (Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/SiConnect), plus I've fleshed out the content generally. Hopefully the notability is now obvious. Could you have another look at it ?

Many thanks ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siconnect (talk • contribs) 09:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Lugia2453. You have new messages at 204.102.241.4's talk page.
Message added 22:50, 28 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Endofskull (talk) 22:50, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

lol

When I was in high school I could never edit because the IP was blocked all the time, because people would blank articles and replace them with ASCII genitalia and the like.

Thought that would change when I got to college. Apparently not.

On behalf of everyone here who isn't a gigantic turd - sorry.

74.115.237.156 (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]