User talk:Lugia2453/Archive 6
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Lugia2453. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Dr.Tahir Ul-Qadri page "Controversies"
Dr Muhammad Tahir Ul Qadri did not make any contradictory statements. The videos used to assume this where edited and placed out of context. the original videos are up on youtube unedited where it is quiet clear that the statement he made did not contradict each other, and this was also explained by Dr Muhammed Thair Ul Qadri to several news anchors. The issue was resolved. so it is incorrect to post that he made contradictory statements rather it should state that it was "thought" that he made contradictory statement on the blasphemy laws but where in fact is was not true and videos where manipulated and not shown under the full context.
hope this shines some light of the actual fact and thats hwy it should be removed from the page. if Require more evidence im sure if you contact the Minhaj group they will provide you with substantial evidence contrary to what is written.
Thanks
grant fleming
Hello,
I created the article for Grant Fleming and have just revised it by adding a reference from a journal.
Thank you
Jennifer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rollsroll3 (talk • contribs) 16:03, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Was just stateing the truth about Germany — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.183.169.220 (talk) 20:40, 2 February 2014 (UTC) the conservative Democrats regaining power in 1876, against a background of electoral violence.
Shortly after, in United States v. Cruikshank (1875), the Supreme Court ruled that the Force Act of 1870 did not give the Federal government power to regulate private actions, but only those by state governments. The result was that as the century went on, African Americans were at the mercy of hostile state governments that refused to intervene against private violence and paramilitary groups.
Whereas the number of indictments across the South was large, the number of cases leading to prosecution and sentencing was relatively small. The overloaded federal courts were not able to meet the demands of trying such a tremendous number of cases, a situation that led to selective pardoning. By late 1873 and 1874, most of the charges against Klansmen were dropped although new cases continued to be prosecuted for several more years. Most of those sentenced had either served their terms or had been pardoned by 1875.
The Supreme Court of the United States eviscerated the Ku Klux Act in 1876 by ruling that the federal government could no longer prosecute individuals although states would be forced to comply with federal civil rights provisions. Republicans passed a second civil rights act (the Civil Rights Act of 1875) to grant equal access to public facilities and other housing accommodations regardless of race. Ironically, the Klan during this period served to further Northern reconstruction efforts, as Ku Klux violence provided the political climate needed to pass civil rights protections for blacks. Although the Ku Klux Act of 1871 dismantled the first Klan, Southern whites formed other, similar groups that kept blacks away from the polls through intimidation and physical violence. Reconstruction ended with the election of President Rutherford B. Hayes, who suspended the federal military occupation of the South; yet blacks still found themselves without the basic civil liberties that Congressional Republicans had sought to secure.[74]
In 1882, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Harris that the Klan Act was partially unconstitutional. It ruled that Congress's power under the Fourteenth Amendment did not extend to the right to regulate against private conspiracies.[75]
Klan costumes, also called "regalia", disappeared by the early 1870s (Wade 1987, p. 109). The fact that the Klan did not exist for decades was shown when Simmons's 1915 recreation of the Klan attracted only two aging "former Reconstruction Klansmen." All other members were new.[76] By 1872, the Klan was broken as an organization.[77] Nonetheless, the goals that the Klan had failed to achieve itself, such as suppressing suffrage for Southern blacks and driving a wedge between poor whites and blacks, were largely accomplished by the 1890s by militant Southern whites. Lynchings of African Americans, far from being ended by the Klan's disintegration, instead peaked in 1892 with 161 deaths.[78]
The second Klan: 1915–1944
Refounding in 1915
In 1915, three separate events acted as catalysts to the revival of the Klan:
The film The Birth of a Nation was released, mythologising and glorifying the first Klan and their endeavour. In 1915 Jewish businessman Leo Frank was lynched near Atlanta after the Georgia governor commuted his death sentence to life in prison. Frank had been convicted in 1913 and sentenced to death for the murder of a young white factory worker named Mary Phagan, in a trial marked by media frenzy. Although the conviction was appealed, it was upheld at each appellate level. The second Ku Klux Klan was founded in 1915 by William J. Simmons at Stone Mountain, outside Atlanta. Its growth was based on a new anti-immigrant, anti-Catholic, prohibitionist and antisemitic agenda, which developed in response to contemporary social tensions. Most of the founders were from a small Atlanta-area organization called the Knights of Mary Phagan, who had organized around Leo Frank's trial. The new organization and chapters adopted regalia featured in The Birth of a Nation.
The Birth of a Nation
Movie poster for The Birth of a Nation. It has been widely noted for reviving the Ku Klux Klan. Director D. W. Griffith's The Birth of a Nation glorified the original Klan. His film was based on the book and play The Clansman and the book The Leopard's Spots, both by Thomas Dixon, Jr. Dixon said his purpose was "to revolutionize northern sentiment by a presentation of history that would transform every man in my audience into a good Democrat!" The film created a nationwide Klan craze. At the official premiere in Atlanta, members of the Klan rode up and down the street in front of the theater.[79]
Much of the modern Klan's iconography, including the standardized white costume and the lighted cross, are derived from the film. Its imagery was based on Dixon's romanticized concept of old England and Scotland, as portrayed in the novels and poetry of Sir Walter Scott. The film's influence was enhanced by a purported endorsement by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson, a Southerner. A Hollywood press agent claimed that after seeing the film Wilson said, "It is like writing history with lightning, and my only regret is that it is all so terribly true." Historians doubt he said it.[80] Wilson's remarks generated controversy, and he tried to remain aloof. On April 30, his staff issued a denial. Wilson's aide, Joseph Tumulty, said, "the President was entirely unaware of the nature of the play before it was presented and at no time has expressed his approbation of it."[81]
The new Klan was inaugurated in 1915 by William J. Simmons on top of Stone Mountain. It was a small local organization until 1921. Simmons said he had been inspired by the original Klan's Prescripts, written in 1867 by Confederate veteran George Gordon, but they were never adopted by the first Klan.[82]
Social factors
Three Ku Klux Klan members standing at a 1922 parade.
In this 1926 cartoon the Ku Klux Klan chases the Roman Catholic Church, personified by St. Patrick, from the shores of America. Among the "snakes" are various supposed negative attributes of the Church, including superstition, union of church and state, control of public schools, and intolerance
The Second Klan saw threats from every direction. A religious tone was present in its activities; "two-thirds of the national Klan lecturers were Protestant ministers," says historian Brian R. Farmer.[83] Much of the Klan's energy went to guarding "the home;" the historian Kathleen Bleeits said its members wanted to protect "the interests of white womanhood."[84] The pamphlet ABC of the Invisible Empire, published in Atlanta by Simmons in 1917, identified the Klan's goals as "to shield the sanctity of the home and the chastity of womanhood; to maintain white supremacy; to teach and faithfully inculcate a high spiritual philosophy through an exalted ritualism; and by a practical devotedness to conserve, protect and maintain the distinctive institutions, rights, privileges, principles and ideals of a pure Americanism."[85]
The second Klan emerged during the nadir of American race relations, but much of its growth was in response to new issues of urbanization, immigration and industrialization. The massive immigration of Catholics and Jews from eastern and southern Europe led to fears among Protestants about the new peoples, and especially about job and social competition. The Great Migration of African Americans to the North stoked job and housing competition and racism by whites in Midwestern and Western industrial cities. The second Klan achieved its greatest political power in Indiana; it was active throughout the South, Midwest, especially Michigan; and in the West, in Colorado and Oregon. The migration of both African Americans and whites from rural areas to Southern and Midwestern cities increased social tensions.
The Klan became most prominent in urbanizing cities with high growth rates between 1910 and 1930, such as Detroit, Memphis, and Dayton in the Upper South and Midwest; and Atlanta, Dallas, and Houston in the South. In Michigan, close to 50% of the Klan members lived in Detroit, where they numbered 40,000; they were concerned about with finite housing possibilities, rapid social change, and competition for jobs with European immigrants and Southerners both black and white.[86] Stanley Horn, a Southern historian sympathetic
What happen with Ontario?
You undid the last edition of this article but it continues the mistake. It seems the program that you used produced an error. Please, fix it. --Humberto del Torrejón (talk) 00:33, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- You're talking about this revision, right? Well, I undid it because the IP replaced all of the information with a statement that the information was wrong. There was no error with the program I used. If there's any wrong information in the article, just remove what's wrong and explain why you did it in your edit summary. Replacing all of the content with something like the IP replaced it with is vandalism. Lugia2453 (talk) 02:57, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Galilee modal haplotype, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page J1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Jan Gissberg
Hi! Jan Gissberg and his movies are all notable, but they have become problematic due to some sort of madman who keeps adding massive chunks of incorrect information to them. They need to be watched but it's not a reason to delete them. Smetanahue (talk) 19:32, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Grumville
The City of Grumville was misspelled. — Preceding unsignedcomment added by 184.57.8.213 (talk) 20:21, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
proposed deletion declined
We rarely propose deletions for film articles that make a reasonable assertion (even unsourced) of notability. See talk page at Peter-No-Tail in Americat. Best, Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
You offered excellent advice to User:Uniulstgrad
You suggested on their talk page that they make use of the AFC process.
I have helped them produce a well referenced piece that they have now submitted. It is at User:Uniulstgrad/sandbox. I was wondering if you would take a look at it as an ordinary editor and offer Uniulstgrad such further advice as you see fit. I'm standing too close to the article to make a decent editorial judgment on it because I've been involved in its genesis. Fiddle Faddle 22:19, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for your very fast appraisal of the article. I salute you. Fiddle Faddle 23:28, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
The Association of Independent Personal Search Agents (IPSA)
Hi, I have amended the submission to include references, could you please review this again 92.13.115.108 (talk) 15:36, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
so sorry
Dear Lugia2453,
I sincerely apologize, one of my friends thought that it would be funny to write something while I was out of the room. My apologies, :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.79.242.185 (talk) 22:42, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
I am sorry dude for writing poo was getting over my girlfriend? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.71.185.120 (talk) 16:01, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
egyptian temples = memphis
egyptian temples = memphis — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.74.116 (talk) 22:59, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you
Hi Lugia
Just a message to say thank you to you for responding to Fiddle Faddle and reviewing the article so quickly. Thank you very much for your help.
Warm regards Uniulstgrad (talk) 13:27, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for page creation and advice: The Grey School of Wizardry
Thank you Lugia2453. Your help was invaluable. I have now created some links to this page as suggested by the Find Link function that you added to the talk page. Please let me know if you have time, whether there are sufficient links to this article to have the "orphan" tag removed. Frances Di Lauro 14:51, 21 November 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fcia0423 (talk • contribs)
AFD of List of Dewey Decimal classes
I have put in a deletion request for List of Dewey Decimal classes as it appears to be a copyright violation. I'm notifying you as you have either made multiple edits to the article in the past year and/or on the talk page for that article and Talk:Dewey Decimal Classification. --Marc Kupper|talk 04:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I have again amended the submission to include UK Government references, could you please review this again
Hi, I have amended the submission to include UK Government references, could you please review this again Sdatipsa (talk) 16:45, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Warning templates question
Hello. I notice you added four different levels of warning to the talk page for 86.42.132.99. Can you tell me what templates you used to add those or direct me to which Help article describes how to use them, please? Wikipedia's damned Help section is so voluminous and sprawling that sometimes the easiest way to find something is to ask someone who knows. Thank you. — O'Dea (talk) 18:35, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- You can find the warning templates I used at Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:35, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you. — O'Dea (talk) 08:55, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Edits to The Futuristics
Hello, i received a message about a changes I made to the Futuristics page. My edits were reverted. Wanted to know why, ive never had issue with this page before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.175.137.152 (talk) 05:28, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cyriel Camiel and Hector Alidor Lesage may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- [[Langemark]] in 1813. Ironically Langemark would become a disastrous landmark during the famous [[Battle_of_Langemarck_(1917)|Battle of Langemarck in 1917. Emile Theophile Lesage was also a
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:04, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Patrick' Bother
i thought it might be interesting to people who knew Ptrick that he has a brother my post after all was under early life. IT MENTIONED HIS PARENTS WHY NOT HIS BROTHER — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.223.246.169 (talk) 23:22, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. The article is about the library as an organization, not about the building housing it. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 01:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Vandalism
Hi,
I received this message:
" Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at May 30 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:13, 1 May 2013 (UTC)".
I don't know how that page was changed using this IP address (I didn't do it), but apologies on behalf of whoever did it.
109.255.148.236 (talk) 01:42, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
List of awards and nominations received by Taylor Swift
Well its a true statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by71.232.242.138 (talk) 21:19, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
The Association of Independent Personal Search Agents (IPSA)
It would be really appreciated if you could review the additional sources I have addedSdatipsa (talk) 10:49, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
I think there's still hope for this one. Can we let it incubate some more? Bearian (talk) 17:34, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
What am I doing. You said a joke so I said a Joke....... — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Next Albert Einstein (talk • contribs) 20:51, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Lugia2453, Jim Hallowes here with a question...
Jim Hallowes <jimhallowes@gmail.com> 9:28 PM (0 minutes ago)
Hi Ligia2453, I don't understand the reasons for your "un-doing" my recent additions, they are quite valid. What were your reasons for deleting them? did I not follow some procedure properly? If not what do I need to do to get the information added? Thank you! Jim Hallowes -- Jim Hallowes Founder, Highly Sensitive People® www.HighlySensitivePeople.com Certified WANT® Trainer and Coach "Educators of Effective Communication Strategies" Certified Transactional Analysis Practitioner 750 W. 15th Avenue, Escondido, CA 92025 1918 Clark Lane, Redondo Beach, CA 90278 Tel: 310-390-4767, Cell: 310-753-9381, Office: 760-294-1965 HSP Newsletter Signup: http://www.formstack.com/forms/?1446580-CrLXyzuVuH Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/jim.hallowes1?ref=tn_tnmn Twitter: @JimHallowes LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/pub/jim-hallowes/3/b98/1aa — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimHallowes (talk • contribs) 05:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- I had reverted your addition because it seemed to be more of an advertisement for your website than a constructive addition to the article. Please read WP:SPAM, which is about Wikipedia's policy on spam (this was what I felt your addition was, and why I removed it). Lugia2453 (talk) 20:55, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Bielefeld
It is well known, at least in Germany, that the city of Bielefeld does not exist, and so neither does its university, although it appears on maps... maybe it is where the government are hiding an alien crash site, who knows. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.220.232.0 (talk) 22:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Roy Oppenheim esq foreclosure defense attorney and legal blogger
Hi lugia i am having difficulty with the article you rejected: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Roy_Oppenheim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sociallyfein (talk • contribs) 00:46, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
why
y Lugia2453 do u want pokemon chaos black deleted so bad i see nothing wrong with it
- (talk page stalker) Because this is an encyclopedia, not a game reference wiki? ES&L 18:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
i know but im putting info about a game that was made in japan its real — Preceding unsigned comment added by Z19pghost (talk • contribs) 19:02, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- The problem is, it doesn't meet the general notability guidelines through reliable sources and explaining why the subject is notable. It lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. This is why I put the article up for deletion. Lugia2453 (talk) 19:10, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
there I add a source now review and it should meet the guidelines — Preceding unsigned comment added by Z19pghost (talk • contribs) 15:03, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
I have removed all Facebook and Twitter references in my article
Hello, Lugia2453! Thank you very much for your recent consideration of my article, and for pointing out to me the changes that I needed to make. I'm not sure if I'm supposed to write here to let you know that the changes have been made. If this isn't necessary, please let me know! I have also hit "resubmit" on my article.
My article is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/The_Beef_Seeds_(band)
Thank you very much for your help. Looking forward to continuing working with you in the future!
-Rafagon726
- Seeing as though I was the first to review your article, I appreciate you messaging me about the changes you've made to make your article better. I reviewed your article, and after some consideration, I decided to accept it. This means that your article is now in mainspace. You've received a message about this. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:01, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Cannot find my article in the mainspace
-Lugia2453
- Thank you kindly for all your help throughout this process. I am definitely very excited! I am afraid I have to bother you once more with a question:
- When I go to the main Wikipedia search page and type "The beef seeds", it tells me:
- "You may create the page "The beef seeds", but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered."
- I tried both with and without the quotation marks, and I also tried leaving out the word "The"; I also tried including the word "band" in the search but that didn't work either.
- I also tried going to the URL directly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beef_Seeds (And that did not work.) — *UPDATE* but.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beef_Seeds_(band) DOES work correctly
- Thank you in advance for your help.
- Rafael (Rafagon726) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rafagon726 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my page! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 17:08, 25 December 2013 (UTC) |
hi
I would like to say sorry for my friend he thought it would be funny to put something about bob the builder. I am terribly sorry and I have told him he is not to use my computer without my permission again. sorryx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.29.105.32 (talk) 21:26, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Chris Cope
I work with Chris Cope and that is his name 72.69.152.50 (talk) 21:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Smoking Fetishism
Did you even look at what I removed? Balloon knot? It was clearly vandalism.
Vanilla (band)
you broke my heart by resetting my Vanilla post </5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daisjpg (talk • contribs) 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
The Leviathan
I don't know how to post on a talk page, so I'm writing it like this. First off, dang you moderators are fast. Second off, the edit I made was only to tell you people that the info is wrong. I didn't know how else to do that besides editing it myself, and I'm a pretty terrible editor. As you can see, I write in the first person nearly all the time, and it is kinda hard to transition to just info. So please look up what I said and change the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.33.172 (talk) 21:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Let me know...
Please restore the change made by Polley Keyz on Umueze Anam article, dated 10:57, 4 May 2014. Thank you very much.
A Tesla Roadster for you!
A Tesla Roadster for you! | |
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2014 (UTC) |
A kitten for you!
hi.......... Lugia
Narender Charan (talk) 23:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Carsond135 sandbox article
Hi! Could you please check over my article again and please let me know of anything I should change? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carsond135 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Olivia Wilde
Some celebrities change their names to something more memorable or less embarrassing in order to become famous, but not Olivia Wilde. She chose to go by "Wilde" instead of "Cockburn" to honor the writerly tradition of her family, many of whom must have found "Cockburn" unsuitable for public life. I simply wanted to emphasize this point in her article, because as it stands it sounds more like an excuse written by a Public Relations professional than a genuine reason, which it assuredly is.
Yo
I happen to live at said Raf station in the UK so I think I have a valid reason for this edit! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dunnagesupervisor27 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
François Besch
The artcile draft for François Besch has been revised, references have been added. Thank you, Vernon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.99.22.162 (talk) 08:11, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Andrew Lawrence - I changed his date of birth because it was wrong, so corrected it. I changed the birth place cos that was wrong also, yeah I changed it to something stupid but no less wrong than the original. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.19.13.88 (talk) 00:22, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Redirect Page Approval
Thx! ~~Junvfr <~_~> (talk) 04:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Dima zales for deletion
... However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ben Ben (talk) 21:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Lugia, sorry for that template. It turned out we both worked on the article at the same time - you were moving it, I was nominating it for AfD. So my tool (WP:TWINKLE) has sent you the message. Blaming the tool sounds lame, so blame me using the tool. Regards, --Ben Ben (talk) 23:01, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Hey Lugia, do you remember the revert you made on my talk page several months ago (Link below - couldn't add it here cause it broke the template)? Well, I do. I've seen you around a lot since then. I just wanted to present you with this honourable barnstar for your excellent anti-vandalism efforts. Efforts to keep the encyclopedia clean. K6ka (talk | contribs) 02:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC) |
Cerebral Palsy page
Hi, in the opening summary, I changed the sentence "The most cases are congenital, arising at or about the time of birth, and are diagnosed at a young age rather than during adolescence or adulthood." into "Most cases are congenital, arising at or about the time of birth, and are diagnosed at a young age rather than during adolescence or adulthood ." and you changed it back for some reason. "The most" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't make sense. I don't know if I'm missing something or what. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.96.148.16 (talk) 21:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Change to page on Pangolin
Hello, Lugia. My edit to the page on Pangolins was indeed not constructive at all. Good on you for acting so quickly. How often do you see things like that? Are "suspicious" edits brought to editors' attention, or did you happen across it just now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.215.236.170 (talk) 21:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- I see things like that every day. I came across it shortly after you made the edit, and reverted it. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:26, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
I Didn't Make A Mistake...
I made an irrefutable, self-evident statement of truth. Flashing brights in a driver's face is assault. If you plan to argue, it means you're pro-murder.
Claims of communication are bogus. They're flat out lies. Nobody believes that. "Let me shine this bright light in a driver's face so he can't see the road. It's to communicate a message with him. What could possibly go wrong?"
I thought Wikipedia was objective and neutral, but they're silencing the obvious assault of this. It's no different from pushing a pedestrian into traffic. Actually, it is different. Because, when you push a pedestrian into traffic, you're not pushing all the other pedestrians with him. So, it's worse than pushing a pedestrian into traffic.50.130.11.182 (talk) 20:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
The Battle of Chesterfield
I've tried to edit my article submission The Battle of Chesterfield but am unable to get the new text and references uploaded. Can you help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garden Bike (talk • contribs) 08:41, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Still learning
Thanks for the cookies - I love chocolate chip! I'll be the first to admit I don't know what I'm doing, I don't even know if this is where to put this response. My feelings won't be hurt by this or future rejections, but it will help me and I am eager to learn what I'm doing. I wish I had more time to figure it out.MarkNashville (talk) 21:13, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for stepping in on Richard Fuisz, it was getting too hot to handle! BethNaught (talk) 21:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC) |
Hello Lugia2453:
WikiProject AFC is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1200 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation
New page proposal: Sims Recycling Solutions, India
Dear editor,
I have proposed a new page "Sims Recycling Solutions, India" which has been reviewed and edited twice over the past four months. Kindly let me know the status of this. I'm keen on getting a neutral article out with your help.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjunmehta88 (talk • contribs) 05:36, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
I didn't make a mistake this needs to be on there
Dear editor,
Hi I I reedit tend my contra union right before I read your message, what I added was a warning, please please read the link I added after. Tethering is a dangerous practice and puts both child and dog at risk, I speak as an autistic adult and service dog handler, there are MANY others who will support me itpn this please feel free to email me at autismdoggirl@aim.cim thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.119.125.5 (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
INDIANA
Squealer Wheeler
- Squealer wheeler(the subject of question) is a major part of our lives here in Indiana. so i think if you would get your mind on striaght we can settle this the easy way or the hard way,not act like IDIOTS, thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.228.104.251 (talk) 15:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
That user is already blocked. Explain the edit you made because you nominated the sandbox the user created for deletion. Did it qualify for CSD G3? Eyesnore (pc) 22:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 17:56, Friday, November 22, 2024 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Ron Rocco listing
Lugia2453,
The artist Ron Rocco created a body of work collectively referred to as "Amerika" therefore that spelling used in the listing is not a typo but a literal title for the group of art works referred to in the text. I have reinstated the correction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.123.217.107 (talk) 14:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
The changes you are making to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NullCrew is not correct. This is not vandalism, as it this is my teams wikipedia account; I would appriciate it if you could manage to stop undoing my changes. Please, and thank you. The vandalism report is a false-positive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NullCrewFTS (talk • contribs) 15:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Kri-Kri
I was just showing a friend that people can change things on wikipedia
- sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.191.190.119 (talk) 14:32, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Invitation join the new Physiology Wikiproject!
Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.
- Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
- You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with {{WikiProject Physiology|class=|importance=}} with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
- You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
- We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
- Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
- Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
- To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
{{subst:WP Physiology–invite}}
~~~~
- To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
{{subst:WP Physiology–welcome}}
~~~~
- You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.
Hoping for your cooperation! DiptanshuTalk 12:51, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!
- please help translate this message into the local language
The Cure Award | |
In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! |
We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)
Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation
Be aware several of the editors involved are grade school students trying to improve the page. While this certainly should be in discussion as opposed to reverting back and forth, please be aware and handle gently if possible. BusterD (talk) 23:51, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Philip Seymour Hoffman
Hello, I got a message from you on my talk section saying "Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Philip Seymour Hoffman with this edit, you may be blocked from editing" I stated "Rest in Peace, Philip" in my edit! I do not see that has vandalizing anything. I see that as respecting. That "DISRUPTIVE" edit was courteous and surely not vandalizing anything. Rest in Peace, Philip Seymour Hoffman. Davidtennants-hair (talk) 18:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Davidtennants-hair
ChristosBourbos
I'm sorry someone other wrote these unacceptable things on Christos Bourbos's page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.128.59.113 (talk) 15:32, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Ditto, I received this
"May 2013
Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to John Michie, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Lugia2453 (talk) 21:24, 6 May 2013 (UTC)"
To quote a 1980s TV programme, "this has got ^nothing^ to do with me". I agree with your edit however. Do you think that maybe people with floating ISPs are being unfairly picked up and messaged? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.80.230 (talk) 08:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
why delete my perfectly good edits that I made.
I got the information on Richard Hammond from his autobiography, on the edge: my story, chapter 1, the early years of an adrenaline junkie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minecraftracer16 (talk • contribs) 15:52, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Upper Pohatcong Higher Council
Why did you delete the Upper Pohatcong Higher Council, it is a newly founded local government group that you know nothing about. What do I need to get for verification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pohatconghighercouncil (talk • contribs) 16:13, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
page "Large Millimeter Telescope" should be "Large Millimeter Telescope Alfonso Serrano
The telescope has the formal name of "Large Millimeter Telescope Alfonso Serrano", in recognition to whom made it happen, and it SHOULD be quoted as such. I know for sure as I am the Director of the Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica (INAOE), actual owner of the telescope.
Could we honor the memory of the person who made this happen until the last day of his life?
Thanks, Alberto Carramiñana, Director General INAOE
Mistaken edit undoing
Lugia2453,
I see you undid a section of the PHP article that I edited, noting that it "didn't seem constructive" to you. I have to assume, due to the timeliness of your action, that you are a bot, as it would explain the lack of research on your part before blatantly removing the edit I made. Anyway, I believe you made a mistake. I removed a section that falsely identified the term PHP as a recursive backronym. PHP is recursive, as it stands for PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor, but it is not a backronym. A backronym is defined as a phrase created by using the letters of a common word as the first letters of each word in the phrase. Because PHP is not a word, it can't be a backronym. It is, however, an initialism, as it uses the first letters of the phrase to create an abbreviation of the phrase that is not pronounced as a word. PHP is a recursive initialism, not a recursive backronym.
I plan to revert your edits to the page, as I view them to be unacceptable and most certainly unconstructive. I expect that, if you are a bot, you will most likely revert mine again, at which point I will not continue to perpetuate the useless fight.
Nelluq (talk) 16:26, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Apologies about that. I'm pretty sure that I made the revert by mistake while trying to revert another edit, or something similar, because I definitely didn't intend to revert your edit. In fact, I didn't even realize I accidentally reverted your edit until you wrote this message, because if I did, I would have undid my revert immediately. I did indeed make a mistake, and I don't mind you undoing it. I'm not a bot, for the record. What I use is a tool called Huggle that allows me to do a lot of reverts in a short amount of time. With the kind of tool it is, mistakes are bound to happen occasionally. I try not to make mistakes, and it's rare when I do, but this is just one of those rare cases. Lugia2453 (talk) 17:55, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Zapped (film) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Zapped (film). Since you had some involvement with the Zapped (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 117Avenue (talk) 03:02, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Telangana
The IP User talk:124.123.122.128, continued to remove the page content. I've reported to admin.--Vin09 (talk) 16:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
2014 Christmas special (Doctor Who)
I am curious what is going on with 2014 christmas special (Doctor Who) (I am using external link to avoid automatic redirect) and 2014 Christmas special (Doctor Who)? It seems as though one is a redirect to the other, which is empty, so both pages should be requested for deletion. Is this right? π♂101 (talk) 18:43, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- What happened was that I moved the page to capitalize the title just as the author blanked it, and I didn't put it up for deletion because I wanted to wait and see if the user was going to work on the article. I wanted to avoid a situation where I put it up for deletion assuming the author wanted it deleted, and have the author add content to the article. Seeing as though this isn't the case, I've put it up for deletion. Lugia2453 (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- That make sense. I was a little confused. Happy editing! π♂101 (talk) 00:55, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Lugia2453. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
- That make sense. I was a little confused. Happy editing! π♂101 (talk) 00:55, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |