Jump to content

User talk:Jayakrishnan.ks100

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pen.cil.80 (talk | contribs) at 08:53, 4 April 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Hello, Jayakrishnan.ks100, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 12:52, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

disruptive IP editors

you have taken the right actions in restoring the correct values from the sources and giving notice to the IPs on their talk page about their inappropriate actions. You may want to be more careful about using the generic vandalism warnings - a whole listing of warnings are found here Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace

the template below talks about inserting factual errors and would probably be most appropriate, increasing the number with each time they repeat the act.

  • {subst:uw-error1} / {subst:uw-error2} / {subst:uw-error3} / {subst:uw-error4}

When they have been given and ignored the "final warning", then they can be reported at the vandal notice board Wikipedia:AIV and an administrator will take action.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 07:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,, Jayakrishnan.ks100! The things mentioned above by User:TheRedPenOfDoom are spot-on. First try warning if the User/Ip is Vandalising, if still continues u may report at :Administrator intervention against vandalism page (mostly after final warning unless it is a blatant Vandalism). Happy editing! reagrds, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 14:17, 21 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 20:04, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On Malayalam cinema edit war

There seems to be an edit war going on Malayalam cinema page. Which started with this edit made by 69.47.228.36. From what I understand, 69.47.228.36 edited an info existed in the Malayalam cinema page and South Indian film industry page for long time. It carried citations to newspapers links justifying it. 69.47.228.36 edited the information and citations too. He then proceeded to edit South Indian film industry also to suit his plans, all these without not a single independent report justifying claim. The edit war has to stop. Please restore the version existed before edit war started, until consensus is reached. ChroniclerSanjay (talk) 10:27, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting you to put your thoughts here: Talk:Malayalam_cinema#Page_protected.
Btw, very surprised to see a new user getting alligned so quickly with the wiki policies. I guess you were here for fairly sometime before migrating to this user name; were'nt you? Cheers, -- Aarem (Talk) 08:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of highest-grossing Indian films worldwide

It should be more or less cleaned up now. There are two outstanding films that need to be sourced (one has some information on the talk page that simple addition should be able to make if one is familiar with converting to US dollars) and then the list put into proper order.

I also left a question on the talk page about what income streams BOI uses to determine Gross that may be added into the lead if appropriate.

If there is information about various box office milestones, (first film to reach X, first film to break X in only overseas collection, etc.) those might be interesting to include as well. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:03, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Kunjacko Boban has acted in 50 films in malayalam cinema as lead and supporting actor and is cosidered as one of the leading actors of malayalam cinema. his latest realse romans has been widely acclaimed for his performance. thank u. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nightocean (talk • contribs) 15:26, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can't just vaguely say "considered". Considered by whom? You should provide the citation for that. Otherwise, it would fall under peacock terms. Same with term 'widely acclaimed'. Wikipedia follows the encyclopedic writing style. So you should rely of factual and provable statements about the subject. JK (talk) 15:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


potential socks

there were several articles where materialthunder and nightocean were edit warring against each other, so if they are the same individual, they either have a split personality or are much more sophisticated in their Wiki-manipulations than they appear. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 07:56, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

case now opened

Another user has indicated a belief that the user is socking through a different account and an investigation has been opened at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Flowers of the world. If you wish to include your views about the other account, please go to the page at add your evidence and WP:DIFFS. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:59, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mammootty

Mr. Mammootty has acted in more than 360 films,in malayalam cinema as lead actor and is cosidered as one of the leading method actors of malayalam cinema. this is long standing sourced material you can check it. thanks. (talk) User:Flowers of the world (talk) d 01:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC) (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Flowers_of_the_world[reply]

Hello, Jayakrishnan.ks100. You have new messages at Rybec's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Peruva, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—rybec 05:55, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Kunchacko Boban shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. You may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mollywood1 (talk) 10:55, 28 March 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

sock puppet investigation opened

I have opened a new chapter in the sock puppet investigation Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Flowers of the world on your behalf. Please provide the more specific evidence. Thanks! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

adding names

It looks like there is a pretty big line of investigations underway Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations, so it may take a while to get to Flowers of the world, particularly when many of them are already blocked.
The only thing I would suggest differently is that when you add new names, after evidence has started to be presented, to put a note (added on DATE) so that people can tell why certain evidence is only discussing certain accounts and if the investigators have already begun they can see that they have more things to look into. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:39, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kunchacko Boban. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Why are you making unnecessary changes to Good Article. ---London at night talk to me 07:52, 30 March 2013‎ (UTC)

Stop misusing warning templates. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a fanpage. JK (talk) 08:17, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who tells it is a fan page. This is not misusing. Merenjith gave me a report that you removing the source from article Kunchacko Boban and you promoting dileep here «»[1]«» ---London at night talk to me 08:29, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be good understanding between both of you and that IP. I will take this upto sockpuppet investigation. JK (talk) 08:39, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What do mean? what sockpuppet? don't be in a fight with me. thanks ---London at night talk to me 15:32, 30 March 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]


I told you that don't be in a fight with me why are you putting my name on Sockpuppet investigations/Flowers of the world here [2] what nonsence is this? what proof did you provide. the proof that you provide is not a solid one.---London at night talk to me 04:24, 31 March 2013

Re: User adamant on not improving the article

Hello, Jayakrishnan.ks100. You have new messages at C.Fred's talk page.
Message added 13:47, 31 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Salim Kumar

I got that childhood info in an interview from Labour India. What reference link is there for it?

I know that you're a Malayalee (judging from your visit to Salim Kumar's Wikipedia page). If so, can you edit and add more info to the two pages I have made?

Those pages are Thatteem Mutteem and Bhima Jewels Comedy Festival. I have improved the article. Still, you can edit it. Please do so. I'll be happy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sureshkumarmalayil (talk • contribs) 13:23, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


user Warning

I told you that don't be in a fight who using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipediawith and why are you putting my name on Sockpuppet investigations/Flowers of the world here [3] what nonsence is this? what proof did you provide. the proof that you provide is not a solid one Wikipedia is not for fight .---London at night talk to me 15:18, 2 April 2013‎ (UTC)

I know you merely copied the word 'fight' from diff and using it indiscreetly. You should atleast read what edit warring means before sending such messages. JK (talk) 15:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know what is the meaning of warring and you are saying that i merely copied the word 'fight'. You are again telling nonsense. I think you want to fight with me. Wikipedia is not for fight. you can reply on my talk page ---London at night talk to me 15:19, 2 April 2013‎ (UTC)

I'm just giving you a polite advice to click that link titled 'fight'. Its the fourth time you are using that word in my talkpage without knowing the meaning. Now I would have to tell you to stop avoid posting on my talkpage on the issue. JK (talk) 15:38, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's up at Kunchacko Boban?

I don't see clear vandalism, so it looks like you're involved in a content dispute at Kunchacko Boban. There is no exception to the bright-line three revert rule in the case of content disputes, so you'll need to present your case at Talk:Kunchacko Boban and work toward consensus for how the article should appear. —C.Fred (talk) 14:55, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

APRIL 2013

Don't put nonsense on my talk page. LIKE THIS [4]. 80 (talk)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jayakrishnan.ks100&oldid=548629916"