Jump to content

Talk:Misao Okawa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RoadView (talk | contribs) at 16:59, 6 April 2013 (→‎Unnecessary Milestones!: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconJapan: Biography Redirect‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 02:01, July 30, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This redirect is supported by the Biography task force.
Note icon
A photograph of this person or group of people in Japan has been requested to improve the article's quality.
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Unnecessary Milestones!

Who agrees with my opinion, that the following milestones are trivial and unnecessary!
  • 2 January 2013: Mamie Rearden died. Misao Okawa, aged 114 years, 303 days, became the last surviving verified person born in 1898.
  • 11 February 2013: Misao Okawa, aged 114 years, 343 days, surpassed Mary Bidwell to become one of the 30 oldest women ever.
  • 1 March 2013: Misao Okawa, aged 114 years, 361 days, surpassed Eva Morris to become one of the 30 oldest people ever.
  • 18 March 2013: Misao Okawa, aged 115 years, 13 days, surpassed Chiyono Hasegawa to become the 4th oldest Japanese person ever.
  • 25 March 2013: Misao Okawa, aged 115 years, 20 days, surpassed Koto Okubo to become the 3rd oldest Japanese person ever. MattSucci (talk) 15:59, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My opinion is: I'm okay with the first one (last surviving person from 1898), the next 2 I am neutral on, but would favor removal and replacement if she reached the top 20 or higher in any of those categories. I agree with removing the 4th oldest Japanese person ever because the one after is more notable at being the 3rd oldest Japanese person ever. My view on the incremental rising through the ranks is: I obviously favor 1st oldest, anything before 3rd I am against (unless it is their final position), and 3rd and 2nd, I am neutral on, which I suppose would default to a keep. Perhaps I would favor additional removal if the timeline idea were implemented to show less important milestones. RoadView (talk) 16:59, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]