Talk:Choice Hotels

Companies Start‑class High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Travel and Tourism: Hotels Start‑class Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hotels.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Brands Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

}

This does not read as an advertisement. I read it as giving facts along with dates --Mrath 19:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Advert tag should be removed. JRHorse 04:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Scottydoo33 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 12 October 2006.

Removed advertisement notice. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Scottydoo33 (talk • contribs) 20:37, 12 October 2006.

Language like "pioneered" (which may be true), "impressive growth" (again, may be true), "revolutionary," and "designed to be luxurious and affordable at the same time" are what led me to place the advert tag on the article. Could someone possibly edit the style/tone of the article to make it read less like a press release? Khatru2 07:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any sign of advertising here, but the tag has returned. Can someone review it and see if it's worth retaining the tag? I don't see it. 72.86.42.38 (talk) 13:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did Rob Spurr really play such a big part in the company as the article says he did?

Travelodge1221 19:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be helpful to explain how the different sub-chains compare to each other, particularly Quality vs Comfort. Erich Fabricius 18:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo choicehotels.gif

Image:Logo choicehotels.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to see the development of the Sleep/Comfort/Quality logos over the years. If I remember correctly, they used to just be circles with increasing numbers of stripes... 71.234.109.192 (talk) 19:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retarded Product List

It's so stupid to link the "products" back to the page you're currently viewing... Why don't these products have individual stubs? Each one is different in various ways. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.129.10 (talk) 11:17, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]