Talk:Sucralose
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sucralose article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Food and drink B‑class | |||||||||||||||||
|
Chemicals B‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Taste
The article makes no mention of the perceived taste of sucralose. Some references to subjective observations and objective testing would be useful. Anecdotally, it is known that many consumers find the sweetener to have an unpleasant aftertaste. algocu (talk) 20:07, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Other Potential Effects
This section is a bit confusing. The Duke University study concluded there might be health effects, but Duke University said the study was not rigorous? Some clarifications of the individual parties within Duke would be helpful. Andy Kass (talk) 16:22, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Center for Science in the Public Interest downgrades Sucralose safety
The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), a nonprofit watchdog group, said today that it was downgrading its safety rating of sucralose from "safe" to "caution," meaning that the additive "may pose a risk and needs to be better tested." This should be integrated in the article. Ref: Fox News: [1] CSPI press release: [2] MaxPont (talk) 09:30, 26 June 2013 (UTC)