Jump to content

Talk:Amplituhedron

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 81.155.213.195 (talk) at 18:45, 20 September 2013 (Explained deletion of link.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Usage and explanation of the terms Scattering amplitude, Scattering patterns

We should resolve several questions about the usage and explanation of the terms Scattering amplitude and Scattering patterns.

I've posted about this to Wikiproject Physics here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Physics#Amplituhedron.2C_Scattering_amplitude.2C_Scattering_patterns)

Thanks - 186.221.170.80 (talk) 20:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like an obvious next step for quantum mechanics to begin to treat mathematics as having the same eleven dimensions as physics. Where the authors speak of making educated guesses their mathematics might allow that rather than precision and irrational numbers there are values that have variable probabilities according to where and how they are vibrating on the membrane.It sounds like a somewhat libertarian philosophy that if you had no laws you would have no crimes...12.187.94.20 (talk) 09:50, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Supercalifragilistic

I love this article! There were almost 2 or three words which I have understood! ;-) [No, it's not a problem, it's an extreme topic.] --grin 06:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

M-theory?

I see no perceptible relationship to M-theory, and invite someone to explain the relationship before restoring the "See also" link to M-theory. As it is, this link seems more confusing than enlightening. 81.155.213.195 (talk) 18:45, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]