User talk:Lugnuts

The German Doctor

Thank you for the nice feedback! Glad to help! --Bleff (talk) 03:07, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Wedding Song (film)

The article The Wedding Song (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film. No reliable sources either

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Mdann52talk to me! 16:08, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Template:Did you know nominations/List of South Africa Test cricketers who have taken five wickets on debut —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 12:37, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:STATicVerseatide has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. STATic message me! 18:25, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lightning Bolt (Pearl Jam album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. STATic message me! 18:26, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

iTunes is a reliable source, nothing in WP:ALBUMS/REVSITE says otherwise. When do bands ever officially announce runtimes for their songs? They do not because it is not that important, that is why we rely on iTunes, no third party news source is going to dedicate an article to the runtimes of songs. STATic message me! 18:32, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AN3

You need to respond to my comment and STATic's comment at the report you filed against STATic at WP:AN3. If you don't respond, you risk being blocked. Even if you do respond, I make no promises.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:32, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lost Killers

The article Lost Killers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doubtful notability. No independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:13, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Let me know if you come across anything that you thinks needs temporary protection against nomadic anons. Deb (talk) 10:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Do I need to elaborate? Deb (talk) 11:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just following up the recent activities of one of that ilk who appears to like talking down to other contributors. Deb (talk) 11:46, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in September 2013

Thanks for moving it from Deaths in 2013, however, as you can see in other monthly articles (as in Deaths in August 2013), the dates are set up in chronological order and not just copy-pasted from the yearly article. You just created more work for others. — Wylie pedia 16:41, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Oubliette for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Oubliette is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Oubliette until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Basket _Feudalist 18:07, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]