Talk:Mikoyan-Gurevich Ye-150 family
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Unnamed section
HELP!! I can't get the specification template to work. Is it faulty on the template page:- Template:Aircraft specs? Or have i done something stupid (usually the case)!Petebutt (talk) 13:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
D"OUBLR HELP!! It is the page. i transferred an obsolete spec template from SEPECAT Jaguar, which showed up ok, but when I put the data in for the Ye-150 it went to text only with no html formatting.Petebutt (talk) 14:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Citations
There's three books listed in the references, but the article is only cited to one of them...? - The Bushranger One ping only 20:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, but correct me if I'm wrong, (probably the case), books listed in a bibliography do not have to be cited in the article.216.241.36.83 (talk) 20:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- If they are not used as a reference they should be in further reading i believe. MilborneOne (talk) 20:23, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Semantics, i thought that is what Bibliography is supposed to be.Petebutt (talk) 19:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Not as used here on Wikipedia. 'Bibliography' is the full citations for the footnotes. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:07, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Semantics, i thought that is what Bibliography is supposed to be.Petebutt (talk) 19:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Peer review
I have asked for peer review because I would like to bring this article up to B-class, at least, but the latest reviewer has not indicated what might be required (other than the obvious of course)Petebutt (talk) 20:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Rather than develop this article further can we investigate merging it with Mikoyan-Gurevich Ye-152 as all these aircraft had the same origins and were merely variants of a single design, it seems to be the right way forward, "less is more" (sometimes)Petebutt (talk) 18:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- I have done the merge and it seems ok. If there are major problems it can always be reverted. Please carry on with the review, but I will be writing a better description section for the article over the next few days/weeksPetebutt (talk) 20:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Mach 2.8?
3030km/h isn't Mach 2.8, it a little over Mach 2.4. I've seen at least one website claim Mach 2.51, but in any case I don't think Mach 2.8+ is accurate.
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- Start-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- Start-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- Start-Class Soviet Union articles
- Low-importance Soviet Union articles
- WikiProject Soviet Union articles
- Start-Class Russia articles
- Low-importance Russia articles
- Low-importance Start-Class Russia articles
- Start-Class Russia (technology and engineering) articles
- Technology and engineering in Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles