Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Evlekis

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 188.29.107.118 (talk) at 18:46, 25 December 2013 (→‎Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Evlekis

Evlekis (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Evlekis/Archive.

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

24 December 2013

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets


Stormfool was in the habit of adding nonsense to articles, and then this was reverted by some of the other accounts (example), but because it looked like legit information the blanking was reverted until it was noticed to be false. User:Let me help you by blanking pages welcomed User:Budlight123 and although the three Bud accounts made no contributions, the logs show that User:Budlight123 created them. User:ΡΙΝΚ ΜΑΡ weighed in here (with their very first edit, seemingly knowledgeable about rollback) and here, and also removed an edit by Good thing of wp, in the same way the Stormfool edits were removed. All these accounts have been indef blocked but I've requested checkuser to check for sleepers. Thanks. –anemoneprojectors– 18:41, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • User has provided disruptive ambiance via multiple accounts, and has reacted to blocks with personal attacks. My thanks to anemoneprojectors for filing this report. JNW (talk) 19:05, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Clerk note: I played a small part in this by indeffing two of the accounts. Although the pattern is not subtle, I'd feel more comfortable checking for sleepers, so I'm endorsing the CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:01, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Stormfool, Tik tok tik tok, Let me help you by blanking pages, ΡΙΝΚ ΜΑΡ and Good thing of wp are  Confirmed Evlekis socks.
  • Budlight123, 1982budlight123 and 1982patrick123budlight are the same, of course, but are Red X Unrelated to Evlekis.
  • Unknownuserxo is also probably Red X Unrelated to Evlekis. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 22:47, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • DoRD, I see you've tagged the Evlekis socks, thanks. Is Unknownuser related to the Bud accounts? If not, I'm going to tag the Bud accounts separately, with Budlight123 being the master (the oldest of the three) and not tag Unknown (remove the current tag) before closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:19, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just realized I'll also have to do something about this being filed in the wrong case.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:29, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oh...yeah, Unknown is unrelated to Bud. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:36, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • I had to change my Preferences to display seconds to determine that Budlight123 was the master. I've retagged that series of accounts but did not separate them out from the Evlekis SPI (the procedures don't address that kind of mix). I did use complex tags so that they pointed to this SPI. I will now close. The clerk who archives this can change the way I've done it if that's needed.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Frankly, since none of the Bud accounts have even made any edits, they should be unblocked and untagged, and perhaps a note should be left for them inquiring about the multiple accounts. Unknown is also not guilty of sockpuppetry, so they should be untagged as well. SPI clerks and regulars should be aware of Evlekis's spoofing tendencies. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 04:48, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've removed the tag from Unknown. After all that trouble, I misread your note above. As for the Bud accounts, if no one does it before me, I'll take care of it tomorrow as I'm way too tired at the moment.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:26, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


25 December 2013

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets


This user claims to be Evlekis. On the Mike Smith history you can see that Master of Spoof inserted false info and used a malicious sock to revert the addition, hoping someone would add it back. These new socks operate on the same MO. Ishdarian 09:20, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Yes it has been a happy one for me, can't say the same to you though. Personally I hope you freeze your balls off and drop dead of pneumonia. 188.29.107.118 (talk) 18:46, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You can shut your mouth too. If you wish to build an encyclopaedia you can permanently ban Bobrayner instead of giving him free toilet paper. It was you who issued him an ARBMAC warning when any admin with half a brain would have blocked him in light of an earlier warning of the same nature, but you prefer not to remove his golden gloves. The whole site is a shambles, I know several dozen articles where vandalism has stood festering for months. If I so much as breathe on them, they'll be put straight back to the constructive versions. Normally I wouldn't mind, but I cannot settle for half measures. WPshould either be completely accurate, or a complete nonsense. Having spent six years backing the wrong horse, I now know what this project would like to be, I am simply lending it support. Bbb23 would you like to do a good service this festive season. Let me suggest you locate your nearest cliff and jump from it, can I also suggest you go head first - for your own good, it's quicker that way. 188.29.107.118 (talk) 18:46, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Evlekis&oldid=587653310"