Jump to content

Talk:The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Subaaedu (talk | contribs) at 10:59, 13 March 2014 (→‎Top Best Coaching Center For C.A. Cpt Ipcc Final: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Former good article nomineeThe Institute of Chartered Accountants of India was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 7, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
March 28, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
April 5, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
January 25, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
February 26, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Comments

In response to the request on my talk page, here are some comments:

  • The GA requirement is that all "direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged" must be referenced by reliable sources. I made a quick skim and don't think there is anything that falls into these categories that is not referenced. Other reviewers may have different opinions, however, as there are large pieces of the article that are unreferenced.
  • Web references should include publishers and access dates.
  • There are a number of dab links that should be fixed, see here.
  • What makes Ref 15 (WeeksUpdate) a reliable source?
  • What makes Ref 24 (FeeleMinds) a reliable source?
  • What makes Ref 37 (ForumforFinance) a reliable source?
  • Ref 39 (Companies Rules, 2006) is a dead link.
  • A lot of the references are still to the ICAI website or related sources (their journal, for instance). More third party sources are always better.
  • There are a number of short sections that make the article quite choppy and harder to read. By combining some of these, I think the article will flow better.

I haven't checked prose or image licensing, so there may be other issues in those areas. I'm also not an accounting expert, so there may be broadness/comprehensiveness issues that I have missed. I would suggest working on the above issues before nominating for GA, although the article is much closer now than it was when I last reviewed it. Dana boomer (talk) 21:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by persons with vested interest

I see that often persons with vested interest in ICWAI, try to bring disrepute to ICAI by editing this article. I dont know what happiness they get by doing so. These persons always tend to be unregistered users hence we are unable to contact then for consensus and requesting them not to do it again. Recently there were few such edits by one such person. He claims that ICAI is not the sole licensing and regulating authority of audit and accountancy profession in India. He fails to understand that accountancy generally means financial accounting and not any other form of accountancy. Similarly he claims that ICAI is not responsible to issue accounting standards. He fails to understand that the accounting standard issued by ICAI are applicable to all entities other than companies. Further the National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards (NACAS) can only consider Accounting Standards recommended by ICAI and does not have suo motu authority. Further NACAS does not issue or notify the Accounting Standards applicable for companies by the Central Government of India. It will be in the best interest of these persons with vested interest not to indulge in such vandalism and instead develop the article of ICWAI with lags behind in a lot of issues. There they can claim that ICWAI is the sole licensing and regulating authority of cost accountancy profession in India. R.Sivanesh 11:15, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

I've semi-protected the article for a week. Please use this time to discuss your concerns on the talk page and build consensus and I suggest that the relevant text not be deleted without a reasonable attempt at consensus. --rgpk (comment) 16:55, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Change in Nomenclature of PE-II/PCC/IPCC Examinations

The Council of ICAI decided to change the nomenclature of PE-II/PCC/IPCC examinations to Intermediate examination.[[1]]. So this article has to be updated to reflect this change. I am not sure how to do that..So somebody pls help. {{help}}--Vi1618 (talk) 02:18, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{help}} above, because there is a duplicate request on this user's talk page, User_talk:SivaneshR#Change in Nomenclature of PE-II/PCC/IPCC Examinations. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  02:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Vi1618, The matter you have brought in is true but this change has not taken effect. It is just a council resolution. Only when the Chartered Accountants Regulations are amended this change will come into effect. I think it is very premature to consider this now. If we add this to the article now, it will create a lot of confusion rather than value addition. So let us wait till the regulations are amended. R.Sivanesh 10:46, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ohhhkk SivaneshR.. i guss u r right.--Vi1618 (talk) 01:35, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Missing

There is no mention in the article about the important committees like Board of Studies, Standing committee etc. Similarly nothing about its monthly magzine. Lastly there should be mention of controversies and cticism of the Institute. ThanksShyamsunder (talk) 09:39, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Top Best Coaching Center For C.A. Cpt Ipcc Final

http://www.subaa.in/Professional-Coaching.html http://ca-icwa-acs-coaching.com/