Bundy standoff
![]() | It has been suggested that this article should be split into articles titled Bundy standoff and Bundy-BLM dispute. (discuss) (April 2014) |
![]() | It has been suggested that this article should be split into articles titled Bundy standoff and Cliven Bundy. (discuss) (April 2014) |
Bundy standoff | |
---|---|
Date |
|
Location | Clark County, Nevada, U.S. |
Caused by |
|
Goals |
|
Status | Ongoing |
Lead figures | |
Cliven Bundy | |
The Bundy standoff is a 20-year legal dispute between the United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and cattle rancher Cliven Bundy in southeastern Nevada over unpaid grazing fees that eventually developed into an armed confrontation between protesters and law enforcement. The dispute began in 1993, when in protest against changes to grazing rules, Bundy declined to renew his permit for cattle grazing on BLM-administered lands near Bunkerville, Nevada.[2] In 1998, Bundy was prohibited from grazing his cattle on the Bunkerville Allotment by the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in United States v. Bundy.[2] In July 2013, the BLM complaint was supplemented when federal judge Lloyd D. George ordered that Bundy refrain from trespass on federally administered land in the Gold Butte, Nevada, area in Clark County.[3]
In early April 2014, after years of violations of multiple court orders, BLM officials and law enforcement officers began rounding up all cattle that were trespassing on the land.[4] They were confronted by unarmed protesters supporting Bundy who were blocking a local bridge. A group of the Bundy's family supporters, some armed, confronted the BLM and requested the cattle back. After negotiations under the same bridge, the BLM eventually backed down and returned the cattle.
Background
Some US government land in Nevada is managed by the BLM, which allows stock grazing in some areas under certain permits and restrictions.[5] Under BLM permits first issued in 1954, Bundy grazed his cattle legally on an area of public land near Bunkerville until 1993. But when grazing rules were changed in the Gold Butte, Nevada, area in Clark County, he protested the decision by declining to renew his grazing permits after February 28, 1993.[2] Though the agency made several attempts to allow Bundy to renew his permit, Bundy declared that he no longer recognized the BLM's authority to regulate his grazing and asserted that he had "vested rights" to graze on the land.[2] Federal courts have consistently ruled against Bundy, finding that he is a trespasser with no right to graze cattle on federal public land and authorizing the BLM to remove his cattle and levy damages for unauthorized use.[2][6] Bundy has since accumulated more than $1 million of unpaid grazing fees and court-ordered fines.[7][8]
Cliven Bundy's worldviews
Bundy does not recognize and will not submit to federal power, claiming that he does not recognize or obey federal laws and denying the legitimacy of the federal government: "I believe this is a sovereign state of Nevada. And I abide by all Nevada state laws. But I don't recognize the United States government as even existing."[9][10] Bundy also denies the legitimacy of the federal court system, and filed a motion to dismiss the BLM legal case by claiming the federal courts have no jurisdiction because he is a "citizen of Nevada".[9] Bundy also believes that federally-owned grazing land in Nevada belongs only to Nevada.[11][12]
The Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks anti-government and hate groups, says that Bundy's views are closely aligned with the those of the Posse Comitatus, who believe that county and state authority are above the federal government, and that Jewish cabals of bankers control national power. They also assert that self-ascribed "patriot" groups are focused on secession, nullification, state sovereignty, and the primacy of the 10th Amendment, and their views overlap with other groups organized around hate.[13][14]
Grazing on US federal rangeland in Nevada
![Much of the West is controlled by the federal government.](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0f/US_federal_land.agencies.svg/400px-US_federal_land.agencies.svg.png)
Rangelands are distinguished from pasture lands because they grow primarily native vegetation, rather than plants established by humans. In 1848, the United States purchased a large expanse of land from Mexico in what is now the southwestern region of the United States, known as the Mexican Cession in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The Nevada Territory, which was partitioned in 1861 from the Utah Territory, became a state in 1864 and later[citation needed] included the Bunkerville Allotment. Since then, the US government has continuously owned land in Nevada.[2][15] Federal rangelands in Nevada are managed principally by either the Bureau of Land Management or the United States Forest Service. Ranchers may lease or obtain permits to use portions of this public rangeland and pay a fee based on the number and type of livestock and the period for which they are on the land.[16]
Federal rangeland laws
Laws that apply to management of public land grazing include the Taylor Grazing Act of 1934 (TGA), the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, the Public Rangelands Improvement Act of 1978,[16] and the Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971. In 1933, Edward T. Taylor, a Representative from Colorado, reintroduced a bill to set up the grazing bureau or service in the Department of Interior to administer range lands.[17] The TGA[a] regulates grazing on public lands (excluding in Alaska) to improve rangeland conditions. The Grazing Service was merged with the General Land Office in 1946 to form the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).[18]
According to Debra Donahue, a law professor at the University of Wyoming, grazing was never established as a legal right in the United States,[19] According to Samuel Western at the University of Wyoming, prior to the enactment of the TGA, an open-range system existed on public domain land.[20] The TGA was enacted by Congress to prevent overgrazing of rangelands,[19] and authorized the permitted use of lands designated as available for livestock grazing while specifying that grazing permits "convey no right, title, or interest" to such lands.[21] This definition was unanimously upheld by the United States Supreme Court in 2000.[22] The TGA allows the BLM to increase or decrease the utilization of a grazing area in response to changing ecological conditions, and permits grazing to be indefinitely suspended or terminated.[21]
Nevada rangeland laws
An article written by University of Nevada Cooperative Extension Educators Gary McCuin and Steve Foster, highlights the Nevada Open Range Law of 1893, a state statute under which "owners of ... livestock running at large on the ranges or commons” were exempted from state civil liability for trespass, and the open range was defined as “all unenclosed land outside of cities and towns upon which cattle, sheep or other domestic animals by custom, license, lease or permit are grazed”.[23] However, the federal Taylor Grazing Act has further regulated grazing on federal land since 1934, and violators may be subject to federal civil and criminal liability.[21]
Federal rangeland grazing regulations
The Bureau of Land Management manages about 167 million acres (676,000 km²) of publicly owned rangeland in the United States, with the United States Forest Service managing approximately 95 million acres (380,000 km²) more.[16] Permittees on federal rangelands are required to pay a fee, and the permit cannot exceed ten years but is renewable. Permits can be revoked because of severe drought or other natural disasters that deplete grazing lands.[citation needed]
Any US citizen or validly licensed business can apply for a BLM grazing permit or lease. To do so, one must either buy or control private property (known as "base property") that has been legally recognized by the Bureau as having preference for the use of public land grazing privileges, or acquire property that has the capability to serve as base property and then apply to the BLM to transfer the preference for grazing privileges from an existing base property to the acquired property (which would become the new "base property").[16]
Federal rangeland regulatory changes in 1993
The grazing rules for the land went through changes over the years, including some updated grazing rules in 1993 in the Gold Butte and Bunkerville land area of Nevada. Among other issues, the 1993 rules were changed to protect the vulnerable desert tortoise.[24] Other rules included limits to the number of cattle allowed in certain areas[25] to protect the lands from the severe overgrazing caused by less regulation in previous years and to help the land recover from recent wildfires.[26] Currently there are no grazing permits on the Bunkerville allotment, and any livestock on that land are there illegally.[24]
United States v. Bundy
The case of United States v. Bundy played out over many years in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. It involved court orders, injunctions, and notices. Bundy argued pro se that the land belongs to the state, while the Bureau of Land Management was represented by the US Attorney's Office for Nevada and the United States Department of Justice.[8] The court ruled that the land on which Bundy was grazing his cattle was indeed owned by the federal government, that he had not been paying to use it as he should have been, that Bundy and his cattle were trespassing, and that the government had the right to enforce the injunctions against trespass. The court found that Bundy repeatedly violated the court orders and continued to have his cattle trespass.[8][27]
Legal actions, 1998–2012
United States v. Bundy "arose out of Bundy’s unauthorized grazing of his livestock on property owned by the United States and administered by the Department of the Interior through the BLM and the National Park Service."[27] On November 3, 1998, United States District Judge (USDJ) Johnnie B. Rawlinson "permanently enjoined (Bundy) from grazing his livestock within the Bunkerville Allotment ('The Allotment'), and shall remove his livestock from this allotment on or before November 30, 1998... (and) ordered that Plaintiff shall be entitled to trespass damages from Bundy in the amount of $200.00 per day per head for any livestock belonging to Bundy remaining on the Bunkerville Allotment after November 30, 1998."[2] Rawlinson stated that "[t]he government has shown commendable restraint in allowing this trespass to continue for so long without impounding Bundy’s livestock."[2] This sentence was restated on October 8, 2013, by USDJ Larry R. Hicks.[27] On September 17, 1999, after Bundy failed to comply with the court's earlier order(s), the court issued another order directing Bundy to comply with the 1998 permanent injunction and modifying the trespass damages owed.[8][27][28]
Legal actions, 2012–14
The cattle expanded into additional public lands over the years. In May 2012, the United States again initiated United States v. Bundy,[b] seeking relief for Bundy's trespassing on a new set of additional lands not covered by the original 1998 ruling: "including public lands within the Gold Butte area that are administered by the BLM, and National Park System land within the Overton Arm and Gold Butte areas of the Lake Mead National Recreation Area."[3] On December 21, 2012, the United States moved for summary judgment in this new case.[citation needed] This motion was granted in an order signed by Senior USDJ Lloyd D. George on July 9, 2013.[3] The George court ruling permanently enjoined Bundy and his cattle from trespassing on the New Trespass Lands.[3] Another order was issued by the Hicks Court on October 8, 2013, which stemmed from the earlier 1998 civil action against Bundy. The orders allow the United States to "protect the ... Bunkerville Allotment against ... trespass" by Bundy and "to seize and remove to impound" any of his cattle that remain in those areas.[27]
Court judgments against Bundy's claims
The Cliven Bundy family owns a 160-acre farm southwest of Bunkerville, which serves as headquarters and base property for the family's ranching operation on nearby public domain lands. The farm property was purchased by the Bundy family in 1948, after they moved from Bundyville, Arizona, and Bundy has claimed that he inherited "pre-emptive grazing rights" on public domain land because some of his maternal grandmother's ancestors had kept cattle in the Virgin Valley beginning in 1877.[8][29] Bundy alternatively argued in legal cases that federal grazing rules infringe on his states' rights.[8]
Claim of inherited grazing rights
There are no legally-recognized inherited grazing rights, pre-emptive rights, special rights, or grandfathered public domain land use rights held by the Bundy family or Bundy's ancestors.[30] Bundy lost his special rights arguments in the United States v. Bundy cases.[2] Bundy had only base property and normal AUM grazing allotment permits, like the permits of thousands of other ranchers throughout the western United States. The court found that Bundy and his father actually first began grazing their cattle on the Bunkerville Allotment in 1954, and used it for several years. They paid for cattle grazing again from 1973 until 1993, when Bundy paid the last grazing fees for his last grazing application for December 1, 1992, through February 28, 1993. On January 24, 1994, the BLM delivered a Proposed Decision Order to Remove and Demand for Payment to Bundy by placing it on the dashboard of Bundy's vehicle while he was in the vehicle. BLM officials allege that Bundy became agitated, walked out of his truck and accused the BLM of harassing him. He then returned to his truck, threw the decision out of the window, and drove away. One of Bundy's sons then picked up the decision, tore it into pieces and threw it on the ground. On February 17, 1994, the BLM issued a final decision canceling Bundy's ephemeral range grazing permit. Bundy subsequently informed the BLM in several administrative notices that he intended to graze cattle "pursuant to my vested grazing rights." Bundy failed to demonstrate the existence of any such special rights when given an opportunity to do so in court.[2]
Claim on states' rights
Bundy lost in US District Court on all his arguments regarding states' rights and jurisdiction in the United States v. Bundy cases. He had argued that the US District Court for the District of Nevada lacked jurisdiction because the United States does not own the public lands in question. The court ruled that "the public lands in Nevada are the property of the United States because the United States has held title to those public lands since 1848, when Mexico ceded the land to the United States."[2] Bundy argued that the Disclaimer Clause of the Nevada Constitution carries no legal force, that the United States' exercise of ownership over public domain lands violates the Equal Footing Doctrine, that the Article Four Property Clause of the US Constitution applies only to federal lands outside the borders of states, that the United States based its authority to sanction Bundy for his unauthorized use of public domain lands on the Endangered Species Act as opposed to trespass, and that Nevada's open range statute excuses Bundy's trespass. These arguments were all rejected by the court.[2][3]
Just remember that the same thing was done by the US Federal Corut in various caese that involved New Mexican ranchers that lost their land because was given to one of their relatives by the King of Spain. The US Government did the same thing. But because Bundy is not hispanic, he's doesn't have a legal leg to stand on.
Bureau of Land Management actions
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f7/BLM_Trespass_Cattle_Closure_Map_04_11_2014.png/220px-BLM_Trespass_Cattle_Closure_Map_04_11_2014.png)
The BLM was tasked with environmental assessment[25] and various enforcement issues regarding the cattle trespass injunctions. During March–April 2014, it closed some areas of government lands during the planning for roundup of the trespass cattle owned by Bundy. In early April, "just before the roundup got underway, a survey conducted by helicopter counted 908 head of cattle scattered across roughly 1,200 square miles of remote mountains and desert managed by the Bureau of Land Management and the National Park Service."[31] The BLM stated on its website:[6]
Cattle have been in trespass on public lands in southern Nevada for more than two decades. This is unfair to the thousands of other ranchers who graze livestock in compliance with federal laws and regulations throughout the West. The Bureau of Land Management and the National Park Service have made repeated attempts to resolve this matter administratively and judicially. An impoundment of cattle illegally grazing on public lands is now being conducted as a last resort."
Government contractors using horses and a small helicopter succeeded in penning almost 400 trespass cattle from April 5 to 9, 2014. "According to state brand inspectors, almost 90 percent of the cattle rounded up by midweek bore Bundy's brand. Of the remaining animals, five belonged to a neighboring rancher, four were marked with brands that couldn't be read, and the rest were slicks, a ranching term for unmarked livestock."[31] On April 17, the BLM confirmed that a cow and a bull owned by Bundy were put down for posing "a significant threat".[32] A state brand inspector said the bull "might have got frightened, but that's no reason to shoot a bull." Another said that bulls sometimes charge at people, adding that it takes "a pretty good-size weapon" to kill Bundy's breed of bull.[33] A page on the BLM website, since removed, listed the impacts of trespass cattle owned by Cliven Bundy. Among these are risks to people driving on roadways, destruction of crops in private property, damage to community property in Mesquite, negative impacts on city facilities in Bunkerville, destruction of archaeological artifacts, and unauthorized reservoir construction.[34] The regional off-site mitigation strategies of non-governmental organizations are also delayed for the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone,[35] and a matching $400,000 grant from the Walton Family Foundation to restore habitat for the Southwest Willow Flycatcher along the Virgin River is delayed on the condition that trespass cattle be removed by Bundy.[36]
After the roundup was suspended due to public safety concerns, BLM spokesman Craig Leff said the agency would continue to try to resolve the matter "administratively and judicially." Leff said, "The door isn't closed. We'll figure out how to move forward with this," and "The BLM and National Park Service did not cut any deal and negotiate anything."[37]
Confrontations and protests in April 2014
In late March, Bundy sent letters entitled "Range War Emergency Notice and Demand for Protection" to county, state, and federal officials.[38] In media interviews, Bundy used the language of the sovereign citizen movement as a rallying call, beckoning support from members of the Oath Keepers, the White Mountain Militia, and the Praetorian Guard.[39] In early April, armed individuals and private militia members from across the United States joined peaceful protesters against the trespass cattle roundup in what has become known punningly as the Battle of Bunkerville.[8][40] BLM enforcement agents were dispatched in response to what were seen as threatening statements by Bundy, such as calling the events a "range war".[41] There was no armed battle.
With many roads closed to ensure safety during the cattle removal, designated First Amendment areas where protesters could safely congregate or exercise their First Amendment right to peaceably assemble were marked with signs and orange plastic fences adjacent to the road.[42][43] On April 8, 2014, Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval issued a statement calling for the removal of the First Amendment restrictions he described as offensive.[44] After stating that peaceful protests had crossed into illegal activity, the federal agencies allowed protesters to go anywhere on the public land as long as they were peaceful.[45]
April 10 confrontations and protests
On April 10, protesters crowded around a convoy to find out why a BLM truck was being used.[8] Bundy's sister was pushed to the ground by a law enforcement officer.[46] One protestor struck a truck and blocked it with his all-terrain vehicle. Officers protecting the civilian truck driver had Tasers and police dogs. The protesters angrily confronted the rangers. According to CNN, "Federal officials say a police dog was kicked and officers were assaulted. Bundy family members say they were thrown to the ground or jolted with a Taser."[8]
April 12 confrontations and suspension of roundup
On the morning of April 12, a heavily armed crowd rallied under a banner that read "Liberty Freedom For God We Stand". Camouflaged militiamen stood at attention, communicating with earpieces. Most had signs, many of which chided "government thugs". Addressing the protestors, Bundy said, "We definitely don't recognize [the BLM director's] jurisdiction or authority, his arresting power or policing power in any way," and "We're about ready to take the country over with force!" After the BLM announced a suspension of the roundup, Bundy suggested blocking a highway.[39] Armed protesters blocked a portion of Interstate 15 for over two hours, causing traffic backups for three miles in both directions.[47] Protesters also converged at the mouth of Gold Butte, the preserve where the cattle were corralled, where a tense, hour-long standoff ensued. BLM rangers warned over loudspeakers that they were prepared to use tear gas.[39] Former Arizona Sheriff Richard Mack, who was with the protesters, controversially said that they were "strategizing to put all the women up at the front. If they are going to start shooting, it's going to be women that are going to be televised all across the world getting shot by these rogue federal officers".[48] Protestors took position on a highway overpass, seemingly offering cover as horse-mounted wranglers led protesters to face off against heavily equipped BLM rangers and snipers.[39]
Las Vegas Metro Deputy Chief Tom Roberts defused the situation by announcing that Bundy's cattle would be returned within 30 minutes.[39] The BLM announced that it would suspend the mass roundup,[1][49] citing safety reasons. Clark County Sheriff Gillespie mediated the agreement between the Bundy family and the BLM, saying, "[W]hen a group of protesters threaten civil unrest or violence in this county -- it is my job to step in and ensure the safety of citizens."[47] BLM Director Neil Kornze said Saturday, "Based on information about conditions on the ground, and in consultation with law enforcement, we have made a decision to conclude the cattle gather because of our serious concern about the safety of employees and members of the public."[50]
BLM spokesman Craig Leff stated in an email that "The gather is over" but that the agency planned to seek a solution "administratively and judicially" and intended to pursue court action to collect more than $1 million in back grazing fees owed by Bundy.[51]
Las Vegas police stated that business owners in Mesquite had received threats because of the conflict.[50]
Aftermath
About 1,500 Bundy supporters attended a celebration on April 18, where they ate Bundy beef, read cowboy poetry, and wore "domestic terrorist" name tags,[7] referencing a comment made by Nevada Senator Harry Reid.[52] Bundy said he would continue holding a daily news conference.[7]
Reactions by public officials
On April 15, a group of Republican legislators, including Representatives Bob Thorpe (R-Flagstaff), David Livingston (R-Peoria), Kelly Townsend (R-Mesa), Senators Judy Burges (R-Sun City West), and Kelli Ward (R-Lake Havasu City) traveled to Mesquite, Nevada, to support Bundy in his standoff with the BLM.[53][54]
Public officials reacted to the confrontations and protests. Governor Brian Sandoval sided with Bundy, saying "No cow justifies the atmosphere of intimidation which currently exists nor the limitation of constitutional rights that are sacred to all Nevadans. The BLM needs to reconsider its approach to this matter and act accordingly."[41]
Arizona Representative Kelly Townsend said that the scenes at the ranch amid the dispute gave her a "visceral reaction... It sounds dramatic, but it reminded me of Tiananmen Square. I don’t recognize my country at this point." Her colleague, Bob Thorpe of Flagstaff, said that he was with about three dozen other state legislators to question federal and Nevada officials.[55]
US Senator Dean Heller of Nevada complained of federal actions during the standoff, saying, "I told him (BLM Director Neil Kornze) very clearly that law-abiding Nevadans must not be penalized by an over-reaching BLM".[41] After the resolution he stated, "emotions and tensions are still near the boiling point."[47]
Nevada Assemblywoman Michele Fiore, who supported Bundy, aiding him with his returned calves, said, "It's time for Nevada to stand up to the federal government and demand the return of the BLM lands to the people of Nevada."[51]
After the BLM left the area for safety concerns, Nevada's Senior Senator to US Congress and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said, "Well, it’s not over. We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it. So it’s not over."[56] Reid also referred to the militia supporting Bundy as "domestic terrorists".[52][57]
Reactions from media
![]() | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (April 2014) |
Media personalities have weighed in on the confrontations. During the standoff, Bundy was interviewed (via remote link) by television host Sean Hannity. Hannity stated that some fear events could wind up mirroring the Waco siege and Ruby Ridge and said, "This is public land, and it’s not being used, in my mind, and I'm not a rancher, (but) I would think the federal government might be thankful because you're cutting the lawn for free, and they're charging huge amounts of money, right, to let your cattle graze there with these fees".[58]
Editorial responses from newspapers have been mixed. The Las Vegas Review-Journal wrote that the BLM was right to defuse the situation, but that the confrontation showed the problems of federal land ownership in the state and called for the federal government to sell off the land in question.[59] The Casper Star-Tribune wrote that Bundy was cheating taxpayers, an "embarrassment to ranchers in Wyoming and across the West who work hard, pay their taxes and maintain good relationships with managers of federal land on which their cattle graze."[60]
Reactions by Bundy and supporters
Some protesters termed the standoff as the Battle of Bunkerville,[61] although there was actually no armed battle.
Some Tea Party Movement supporters expressed solidarity with the Bundys, including three Southern Nevada Tea Party groups that organized a protest outside Las Vegas police headquarters on April 11, 2014, claiming that Sheriff Doug Gillespie had failed in his duty to protect Nevadans from abuse by the federal government.[62]
The Bundy family claimed victory on having its cattle returned.[63] In an interview after the BLM's withdrawal, Sean Hannity asked Bundy if he had a reply to Senator Harry Reid's comment that the situation was not over. Bundy said, "I don't have a response for Harry Reid, but I have a response for every county sheriff across the United States. Disarm the federal bureaucrats."[56][64]
On April 19, 2014, Bundy spoke about witnessing a civil disturbance, the 1965 Watts riots.[65] Bundy described his views about unhappiness at that time and criticized what he saw as government interference and its influence on African Americans. He recalled later seeing a public housing project in North Las Vegas where some of the older residents and the kids sat on the porch. He said: "They didn't have nothing to do ... they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do? They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I've often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn't get no more freedom. They got less freedom."[7][66]
In reference to Mexican people, he said, "[t]hey come over here against our Constitution and cross our borders, but they're here, and they're people ... Don't tell me they don't work, and don't tell me they don't pay taxes. And don't tell me they don't have better family structures than most of us white people."[65]
Ben Swann questioned whether Bundy's "inarticulate" comments were given a "truthful representation", and published a 3 minute 13 second video segment that includes the comments preceding, and following, the abbreviated quote published by Adam Nagourney of the New York Times.[65][7]
Ranking Democratic Senator Harry Reid condemned the Bundy statement and said Bundy had "revealed himself to be a hateful racist. But by denigrating people who work hard and play by the rules while he mooches off public land he also revealed himself to be a hypocrite... It is the height of irresponsibility for any individual or entity in a position of power or influence to glorify or romanticize such a dangerous individual... For their part, national Republican leaders could help show a united front against this kind of hateful, dangerous extremism by publicly condemning Bundy."[67][68]
A number of Republican politicians and talk-show hosts that previously had supported Bundy forcefully condemned his remarks as racist,[69][70] including junior NV Senator Dean Heller, who previously had described Bundy defenders as "patriots”, and Senator Rand Paul who also previously had supported Bundy.[71][70] On April 23, Heller said through a spokesperson that he "completely disagrees with Mr. Bundy’s appalling and racist statements, and condemns them in the most strenuous way".[7] On April 23, Bundy defended his comments by saying "the statement was right".[72] Sean Hannity, who supported Bundy in his Fox News talk show, said that Bundy's remarks were “beyond repugnant”. Glenn Beck criticized Bundy’s comments saying that the rancher is “unhinged from reality” and urged his supporters to "end your relationship” with him.[73][74] Other conservative politicians that distanced themselves from Bundy included Michael Steele and Reince Priebus.[75]
Legal and rule-of-law reactions
Atlantic reporter Matt Ford pointed out that Bundy's claim, "I abide by all of Nevada state laws. But I don’t recognize the United States government as even existing," is at odds with Nevada's law, specifically the state's constitution. Framed during the Civil War, Nevada's constitution specifically mentions the rights of the federal government, stating in Article 1, Section 2, "The Paramount Allegiance of every citizen is due to the Federal Government in the exercise of all its Constitutional powers as the same have been or may be defined by the Supreme Court of the United States...whensoever any portion of the States, or people thereof attempt to secede from the Federal Union, or forcibly resist the Execution of its laws, the Federal Government may, by warrant of the Constitution, employ armed force in compelling obedience to its Authority."[76]
The Salt Lake City Tribune published an editorial on April 15 entitled "Bundy is a lawbreaker, not a hero", in which it said, "Don't let him get away with it" and "The only winner in this was a scofflaw who has twice lost in the courts for running cattle where they don’t belong and skipping out on grazing fees. Some 20,000 ranchers in Western states abide by BLM regulations, so what makes Bundy special?" To sum it up, the Tribune said, "When some manage to avoid justice by extralegal means, the rule of law is weakened for all Americans."[77]
Some of Bundy's neighbors were not impressed by his actions.[78] "I feel that the rule of law supersedes armed militias coming in from all over the country to stand with a law-breaking rancher, which is what he is", Mesquite resident Elaine Hurd told local television station KLAS.[37][78]
Roger Taylor, a retired BLM district manager in Arizona, said the agency's decision to release the cattle would have repercussions. "The (agency) is going to be in a worse situation where they will have a much more difficult time getting those cattle off the land and getting Bundy in compliance with regulations," he said.[79]
Dallas Hyland, in his column in Utah's St. George News, wrote, "The stand-down was necessary to prevent bloodshed, but it must be recognized that if Bundy and a multitude of his supporters, militia friends, and even family members who broke the law, are allowed to go unpunished, anarchy will follow.[80][81] In the case of Bundy and the Gold Butte designations, the government did it right. They continued to do it right in the face of the lawless behavior of a rancher and his militia henchmen."[80]
Shoshone history and reactions
The year prior to Nevada being admitted to the Union, the US signed the Treaty of Ruby Valley, recognizing the Western Shoshone as owners of large portions of their original territory. In 1979, the Indian Claims Commission awarded the Shoshone $26 million in compensation for land lost to “settler encroachment”, whose settlers would include the ancestors of Cliven Bundy. The tribe refused to cede the lands for payment at that time, as it was slated to be used for nuclear testing. [82] [83] [84]
In comparison to the outcome in the Bundy case, the Dann sisters, Mary and Carrie, who also refused to pay grazing fees on this land, claiming that this was acknowledged to be Shoshone land. The land was invaded by agents of the BLM, and cattle seized with a fine of $3 million. A petition was lodged with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (the "Commission”) against the United States of America by the Indian Law Resource Center in defense of the Dann sisters. The Commission concluded that the State failed to ensure the Danns’ right to property under conditions of equality contrary to Articles II, XVIII and XXIII of the American Declaration in connection with their claims to property rights in the Western Shoshone ancestral lands.The cattle were auctioned off by the BLM the next day. [85] [86] The United Nations Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination criticized the U.S. for human rights violations, but no further action taken. [87]
Political commentary reactions
David Damore, a political science professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, said that there is "a great ability on the part of these folks to overlook the reality of how much the federal government subsidized Nevada in terms of big projects – the Hoover Dam, the mining subsidies. It's a welfare cowboy mindset."[39]
Brad Knickerbocker of the Christian Science Monitor saw the events as echoing the Sagebrush Rebellion, a 1970s movement to transfer control of public domain lands to the states.[88][89]
Environmentalist reactions
The nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity stated, "Despite having no legal right to do so, cattle from Bundy's ranch have continued to graze throughout the Gold Butte area, competing with tortoises for food, hindering the ability of plants to recover from extensive wildfires, trampling rare plants, damaging ancient American Indian cultural sites and threatening the safety of recreationists."[6]
Rob Mrowka, also with the Center for Biological Diversity, said that the BLM "is allowing a freeloading rancher and armed thugs to seize hundreds of thousands of acres of the people's land as their own. It's backing down in the face of threats and posturing of armed sovereignists."[51]
Environmentalists held that the BLM's withdraw sent the wrong message to law-abiding ranchers who do secure grazing permits and operate within the law.[51]
Wild horse rangeland reactions
Supporters of wild horses, such as Bonnie Kohleriter, complain that the government is favoring sheep and cattle by allowing them to feed at taxpayer's expense and at the physical expense of mustangs sharing the same overgrazed rangeland. Ranchers retort that the government is not rounding up enough mustangs for removal and slaughter, as the herds of these wild horses doubles every five years. Environmental groups such as the Wildlife Society hold that both livestock and mustangs are destroying the native habitat for native species.[51]
Bundy family background
The Bundy family purchased their farm outside of Bunkerville in 1948; the farm would serve as headquarters and base property for their ranching operation, which began in 1954, on federal land. They had moved to the area from Bundyville, Arizona (near Mount Trumbull). Cliven Bundy's father, David Bundy, was born in Bundyville in 1922.[90] David Bundy had married Margaret Bodel Jensen of Bunkerville, and after starting a family in Arizona, they purchased their property outside of Bunkerville in 1948.[29]
Cliven had argued in court that his "Mormon ancestors began working the land in the 1880s".[91][92] This argument has basis in Cliven's maternal grandmother's ancestral line, but not among his paternal or other maternal lines. Cliven's mother's father, John Jensen, was born in Utah, but her mother, Abigail Christina Abbott, was born in the Bunkerville/Mesquite area. Abigail Christina Abbott's parents, both born in Utah, were among early settlers of Bunkerville/Mesquite in the 1880s; this includes lines from the Leavitt and Abbott families. These early families moved in and out of the area on several occasions, and polygamous marriages meant some wives and their families were kept in different towns. As such, there is no continuous line of family births and habitation in Bunkerville/Mesquite from Cliven Bundy to the few ancestors who settled the area.[29]
Leavitt family connection
Bundy's maternal family had some connection to Bunkerville through his ancestor, Dudley Leavitt, a Canadian who moved to Utah after joining the LDS Church.[c] After marrying wives in Utah in 1853, 1855, 1859, 1860, and 1872[93] and selling his Gunlock, Utah, property, he moved to Bunkerville, Nevada. The original location he settled was south of Mesquite, 2+1⁄2 miles (4.0 km) northeast of present-day Bunkerville. The community was named after Edward Bunker, Sr., the leader of the group of 23 men (the United Order) who originally agreed to move west. All property was originally shared in common, which caused great strife within the community. The communal property was then divided up, with Dudley expressing displeasure at his small portion.[citation needed] He then moved from the community across the river to Mesquite by 1881. When the Virgin River flooded, he moved again and was contracted to carry mail across a 180 miles (290 km) round-trip distance from St. George, Utah, to St. Thomas, Nevada.[citation needed] He placed his five families in various locations along the route. The family of Mary Jane Leavitt (Cliven Bundy's great-grandmother) was kept at Leavittville, Arizona.[94]
Abbott family connection
Cliven Bundy's great-great-grandfather was Myron Abbott.[93][d] He left Ogden Canyon, Utah, to join Edward Bunker, Sr., in forming the United Order, serving as teacher of the workers and as the second counselor to Bunker, who was made bishop of the community.[95] After the United Order dissolved, Abbott spent his time plowing and tending farmland, in addition to transporting salt from St. Thomas to Santa Clara, Utah.[96] His son, William Abbott, married Dudley Leavitt's daughter Mary Jane Leavitt at the St. George Utah Temple in 1890;[95] Cliven Bundy's maternal grandmother, Abigail Christina Abbott, was their child. William Abbott traveled through the United States on Mormon missions and served as the bishop of the Mesquite Ward from 1901 to 1927. He wrote the story of his family settling in Mesquite and his missions across the United States in The Story of My Life, an autobiography and family biography.[97]
Similar federal grazing legal cases
Several other legal cases in Nevada run parallel to the Bundy case. They involve public domain lands that are controlled by federal agencies and ranchers who were taken to court for cattle grazing permit violations or trespass cattle.
United States v. Gardner
Cliff Gardner, a defendant in an illegal cattle grazing court case in Nevada,[78] United States v. Gardner,[98] drew comparisons to his case when he said, "I think Cliven is taking a stand not only for family ranchers, but also for every freedom-loving American, for everyone.[78] I’ve been trying to resolve these same types of issues since 1984."[78] Gardner argued and lost on states' rights, similar to Bundy,[2][78][98] and eventually served time for ignoring court orders and contempt.[78] The Gardner case is cited in Bundy court filings. In United States v. Gardner, decided in the District Court and later affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, the Gardners did not contest that they grazed livestock without a permit, nor the amount of the fee assessed. Instead, they asserted that the Nevadan lands where they grazed did not belong to the United States, and therefore the Forest Service did not have jurisdiction to regulate use of the lands or levy fees for unauthorized activities within them.[98] In March 2002, Cliff Gardner was sentenced to a month in a Reno halfway house, along with a $5,000 fine and a year of probation.[78]
United States v. Hage
Elko County commissioner, Nevada rancher, and conservative Republican political activist Demar Dahl notes that Bundy might benefit from following Nye County rancher Wayne Hage, who won a protracted battle with the federal government by successfully arguing that he had the right to graze his cows within two miles of water sources he developed. In a similar case[99] to Bundy's, ranchers in 2007 were sued by the Justice Department for trespassing on public domain lands in Nevada.[99][100] The ranchers were alleged to have repeatedly grazed livestock without federal permits, despite repeated trespass notices from the BLM and the Department of Agriculture's Forest Service.[100] In 2013, the court found in favor of the ranchers for all other charges, including water rights,[99] grazing rights, and all but two livestock trespass charges in United States v. Wayne Hage. In the ruling, the judge said, "government officials ... entered into a literal, intentional conspiracy to deprive the Hages not only of their permits but also of their vested water rights. This behavior shocks the conscience of the Court and provides a sufficient basis for a finding of irreparable harm to support the injunction described at the end of this Order."[101]
Notes
- ^ 43 U.S. Code §§ 315-316o (P.L. 73-482)
- ^ Case No. 2:12-cv-0804-LDG-GWF
- ^ Cliven Bundy > Margaret Bodel Jensen, 9th child > Abigail Christina Abbott, 1st child, born 1891 in Bunkerville, Nevada, married John Jensen 1909 in St. George, Utah > Mary Jane Leavitt born 1873 in Gunlock, Utah, married William Abbott 1890 in St. George, Utah > Dudley Leavitt born 1830 in Hatley, Quebec, Canada
- ^ Cliven Bundy > Margaret Jensen > Abigail Abbott > William Abbott > Myron Abbott
References
- ^ a b Knapp, George. "BREAKING NEWS: BLM ends roundup of Bundy cattle". KLAS-TV Las Vegas. KLAS-TV Las Vegas. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Decision and Order - United States v Bundy - 1998. United States District Court for the District of Nevada. November 3, 1998. p. 5.
- ^ a b c d e "United States of America v. Bundy - Document 35 - Court Description: ORDER Granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Denying as moot 28 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 7/9/2013". Justia. July 9, 2013.
- ^ Rancher vs BLM: a 20-year standoff ends with tense roundup, Christi Turner, High Country News, April 11, 2014
- ^ "Fact Sheet on the BLM's Management of Livestock Grazing". United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management. March 28, 2014. Retrieved April 24, 2014.
- ^ a b c Glionna, John. "BLM seizes cattle in range war with stubborn Nevada rancher". Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
- ^ a b c d e f Nagourney, Adam (April 23, 2014). "A Defiant Rancher Savors the Audience That Rallied to His Side". The New York Times. Retrieved April 24, 2014.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Martinez, Michael (April 10, 2014). "Showdown on the range: Nevada rancher, feds face off over cattle grazing rights". CNN. Retrieved April 10, 2014.
- ^ a b "A rancher's armed battle against the US government is standard libertarian fare". The Guardian. Retrieved April 27, 2014.
- ^ Strasser, Max. "For Militiamen, the Fight for Cliven Bundy's Ranch Is Far From Over". Newsweek. Retrieved April 27, 2014.
- ^ "Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy: "The citizens of America" got my cattle back". CBS / Associated Press. April 27, 2014. Retrieved April 27, 2014.
- ^ Bundy doesn’t understand Constitution, Ian Bartrum, Las Vegas Review-Journal, April 27, 2014
- ^ "Bundy saga reveals the risk of cozying up to extremists". Washington Post. Retrieved April 27, 2014.
- ^ "Antigovernment 'Patriots' Gather Near Scene of Nevada Rancher's Dispute Over Cattle Grazing Rights". SPL. Retrieved April 27, 2014.
- ^ Gray, Tom. "Teaching With Documents: The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo". National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved April 24, 2014.
- ^ a b c d "Rangelands/Grazing". Bureau of Land Management. Retrieved April 15, 2014.
- ^ Steen, Harold K. The United States Forest Service A History University of Washington Press, 1976, p. 205 ISBN 0-295-95523-6
- ^ Muhn, J (1988). Opportunities and challenge: The story of the BLM. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. p. 54.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b Donahue D. 2005. Western grazing: the capture of grass, ground, and government. Environmental Law 35:721-806.
- ^ wyohistory.org: "The Wyoming Sheep Business" (Western)
- ^ a b c "PART 4100—GRAZING ADMINISTRATION—EXCLUSIVE OF ALASKA". United States Code of Federal Regulations 4130.2 (c) April 22, 2014.
- ^ Public Lands Council v. Babbitt, 2000
- ^ unr.edu: "Fact Sheet-10-69 NEVADA OPEN RANGE LAW" (McCuin and Foster)
- ^ a b Fuller, Jaimie (April 28, 2014). "Everything you need to know about the long fight between Cliven Bundy and the federal government". Washington Post. Retrieved April 28, 2014.
- ^ a b Bureau of Land Management. "Environmental Assessment Temporary Land Closure Corrals and Cattle Impoundment" (PDF). Retrieved April 13, 2014.
- ^ "Nevada Governor Calls Federal Cattle Roundup 'Intimidation'". CBS Las Vegas. April 9, 2014. Archived from the original on April 14, 2014. Retrieved April 14, 2014.
- ^ a b c d e "United States v Bundy" (PDF). United States District Court for the District of Nevada. October 9, 2013.
- ^ Knightly, Arnold M. (April 11, 2014). "Cliven Bundy supporters bring cattle roundup protest to Las Vegas police headquarters". Las Vegas Review-Journal.
- ^ a b c Kanigher, Steve (April 22, 2014). "An abbreviated look at rancher Cliven Bundy's family history". KLAS-TV. Las Vegas. Retrieved April 23, 2014.
- ^ "Debunking false claims of Bundy's defenders". Las Vegas Sun. April 27, 2014. Retrieved April 28, 2014.
- ^ a b Brean, Henry (April 11, 2014). "Good progress in cattle roundup to decelerate". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Retrieved April 13, 2014.
- ^ "BLM says 6 cattle died in disputed Nevada roundup". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. April 23, 2014. Retrieved April 22, 2014.
- ^ Ben Botkin; Keith Rogers (April 17, 2014). "BLM: 2 bulls euthanized during Cliven Bundy cattle roundup". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Retrieved April 23, 2014.
- ^ "Cattle Trespass Impacts". archive.today. archive.today. Retrieved April 24, 2014.
- ^ "Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone (SEZ) Solar Regional Mitigation Planning Project". Bureau of Land Management. Retrieved April 24, 2014.
- ^ "Virgin River Program". Bureau of Land Management. Retrieved April 24, 2014.
- ^ a b CBS, News (April 14, 2014). "Nevada rancher standoff turns on a states' rights debate". CBS News. Retrieved April 15, 2014.
{{cite news}}
:|first=
has generic name (help) - ^ Donahue, Mike (March 24, 2014). "Bundy declares 'range war', BLM to impound embattled rancher's cattle". Desert Valley Times. Retrieved April 16, 2014.
- ^ a b c d e f Daniel Hernandez, Joseph Langdon and (April 13, 2014). "Federal rangers face off against armed protesters in Nevada range war". The Guardian. Retrieved April 14, 2014.
- ^ Jennifer Dobner (April 12, 2014). "U.S. agency ends Nevada cattle roundup, releases herd after stand-off". Reuters.
- ^ a b c "Nevada officials blast feds over treatment of cattle rancher Cliven Bundy". FoxNews.com. April 10, 2014.
- ^ Goldstein, Sasha. "Nevada rancher in tense standoff with federal government over cattle on rural public lands". New York Daily News. New York Daily News. Retrieved April 11, 2014.
- ^ Niraj Chokshi (April 9, 2014). "The federal government moved some cows and Nevada's governor isn't happy about it". Washington Post.
- ^ Brean, Henry (April 10, 2014). "Bundy vs. BLM: Interest in cattle dispute widens". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Retrieved April 14, 2014.
- ^ Martinez, Michael (April 10, 2014). "Showdown on the range: Nevada rancher, feds face off over cattle grazing rights". CNN. Retrieved April 10, 2014.
In response, federal officials are allowing the protesters to gather on public lands as long as they don't impede the roundup, said Lueders, the BLM's director in Nevada.
- ^ "Out-of-state groups ride in to stand with Nevada rancher in battle with feds over civil rights". Fox News. Fox News. Retrieved April 11, 2014.
- ^ a b c Ralph Ellis; Michael Martinez (April 12, 2014). "Feds end roundup, release cattle after tense Nevada showdown". CNN. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
- ^ Fuller, Jaime (April 15, 2014). "Everything you need to know about the long fight between Cliven Bundy and the federal government". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 23, 2014.
- ^ Turner, Christi. "Rancher vs BLM: a 20-year standoff ends with tense roundup". High Country News. High Country News. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
- ^ a b Tom Ragan and, Annalise Porter (April 12, 2014). "BLM releases Bundy cattle after protesters block southbound I-15". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Retrieved April 14, 2014.
- ^ a b c d e "Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy inspects cattle for damage by feds". CBS News. April 15, 2014.
- ^ a b Pleasance, Chris (April 18, 2014). "Domestic terrorists. Senator Harry Reid brands Nevada cattle rancher Cliven Bundy and his supporters enemies of the US". The Daily Mail, Newspaper, UK. Retrieved April 19, 2014.
- ^ "WATERCOOLER: RANCHER STANDOFF". Arizona Central. Retrieved April 27, 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|1=
(help) - ^ "Republican Legislators Caravan To The Bundy Ranch". Tuscon Weekly. Retrieved April 27, 2014.
- ^ "Tea Party Lawmaker: Nev. Cattle Roundup 'Reminded Me Of Tiananmen Square'". CBS Las Vegas. April 11, 2014.
- ^ a b Steve Benen (April 15, 2014). "Reid says Bundy Ranch standoff 'not over'".
- ^ Macneal, Caitlin. "Harry Reid Calls Bundy Supporters 'Domestic Terrorists'". Talking Points Memo, TPM Media LLC. Retrieved April 19, 2014.
- ^ Travis Gettys (April 10, 2014). "Sean Hannity inflames brewing 'range war' between feds, militia over NV cattle roundup".
- ^ EDITORIAL: BLM’s cattle battle ends — for now, Las Vegas Review-Journal, April 16, 2014
- ^ Editorial board: Dismiss Cliven Bundy for what he is -- a guy trying to dodge a bill, Casper Star-Tribune, April 28, 2014
- ^ Ryan Gorman, Dan Miller, Meghan Keneally, Jessica Jerreat (April 11, 2014). "Federal agents back down in stand-off with armed cowboys". Daily Mail.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Arnold M. Knightly (April 11, 2014). "Cliven Bundy supporters bring cattle roundup protest to Las Vegas police headquarters". Las Vegas Review-Journal.
- ^ Dobson, Jennifer (April 13, 2014). "Nevada ranching family claims victory as government releases cattle". Yahoo! News
- ^ "Cliven Bundy on Harry Reid: 'I Don't Think There's Any Hope for Him, He Needs to Be Kicked Out of Office'". Fox News.
- ^ a b c Swann, Ben (April 25, 2014). "Truth in Media: Cliven Bundy's "Racist" Remarks Were Also Promoting Hispanic Culture? What MSM Isn't Telling You". Ben Swann. Archived from the original on April 25, 2014. Retrieved April 26, 2014.
{{cite web}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; April 26, 2014 suggested (help) - ^ "Rebellious Nevada rancher's slavery remarks dim Republican support". Reuters. Retrieved April 25, 2014.
- ^ reid.senate.gov: "Reid Calls For Leaders To Unite In Condemnation Of Cliven Bundy’s Dangerous Extremism" 24 Apr 2014
- ^ Burr, Thomas (April 24, 2014). "Utah's Bishop calls Bundy's race comments 'degrading'". The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved April 24, 2014.
- ^ "Cliven Bundy's 'better off as slaves' remark about blacks draws fire http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-nevada-rancher-bundy-slaves-20140424,0,4670278.story#ixzz2zrBvKutF". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved April 25, 2014.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|title=
- ^ a b "Republicans denounce rancher Cliven Bundy's racist comments". CBS News. Retrieved April 25, 2014.
- ^ "Cliven Bundy, Rancher At Center of Feud With Feds, Condemned for Racist Remarks". ABC News. Retrieved April 24, 2014.
- ^ Abdullah, Halimah (April 24, 2014). "Cliven Bundy: Another conservative folk hero exposes racial nerve". CNN. Retrieved April 24, 2014.
- ^ "Glenn Beck: Cliven Bundy 'unhinged'". POLITICO. Retrieved April 24, 2014.
- ^ "Hannity: Bundy remarks 'beyond repugnant'". POLITICO. Retrieved April 24, 2014.
- ^ "Republicans distance selves from Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy over racial remarks". Washington Post. April 24, 2014. Retrieved April 25, 2014.
- ^ Matt Ford (April 14, 2014). "The Irony of Cliven Bundy's Unconstitutional Stand". Atlantic.
- ^ Salt Lake City Tribune, newspaper. "Editorial: Bundy is a lawbreaker, not a hero". Salt Lake City Tribune. Retrieved April 15, 2014.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Fuller, Jaime (April 15, 2014). "Everything you need to know about the long fight between Cliven Bundy and the federal government". Washington Post. Retrieved April 15, 2014.
- ^ Dobner, Jennifer (April 13, 2014). "Nevada ranching family claims victory as government releases cattle". Reuters. Retrieved April 16, 2014.
- ^ a b Hyland, Dallas (April 13, 2014). "On Kilter: Bundy won, America lost". St. George News. Retrieved April 16, 2014.
- ^ Sebelius, Steve (April 16, 2014). "Let's be honest about what Bundy is, and is not". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Retrieved April 16, 2014.
- ^ http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2014/04/18/how-did-i-miss-militia-god-gave-land-settlers-not-shoshone-154472
- ^ http://www.indiancountrynews.info/shoshone.cfm.htm
- ^ http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cases/75-02a.html
- ^ http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2014/04/19/video-dann-sisters-battle-save-their-cattle-stark-contrast-clive-bundy-154521
- ^ http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cases/75-02a.html
- ^ http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2002/10/15/human-rights-panel-return-dann-cattle-88140
- ^ Brad Knickerbrocker (April 13, 2014). "Nevada range fight revises 'Sagebrush Rebellion'". The Christian Science Monitor.
- ^ "BLM tries to resolve conflict with ranchers". Associated Press. April 14, 2014.
- ^ Bundy family tree
- ^ Paresh, Dave. "Citing armed protesters, BLM returns seized cattle to Nevada rancher". LA Times. LA Times. Retrieved April 16, 2014.
- ^ NBC, News (April 14, 2014). "Timeline: History of land dispute between Cliven Bundy and the BLM". NBC News. Retrieved April 16, 2014.
{{cite news}}
:|first=
has generic name (help) - ^ a b "Cliven D Bundy". Genealogical Database. Retrieved April 24, 2014.
- ^ "Dudley Leavitt, Pioneer to Southern Utah by Juanita Brooks, 1942 page 76".
- ^ a b "Dudley Leavitt, Pioneer to Southern Utah by Juanita Brooks, 1942 p. 84".
- ^ Myron Abbott: An Enduring Legacy Immigrant Pioneers. Utah State University Special Collections Library page 3-5 [1]
- ^ "Abbott, William Elias, 1869-1949". Google Web Cache. Retrieved April 24, 2014.
- ^ a b c United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. "UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clifford GARDNER; Bertha Gardner, Defendants-Appellants". US Federal Government. Retrieved April 16, 2014.
- ^ a b c Smith, John L. (April 16, 2014). "Nevada rancher questions Bundy's legal strategy". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Retrieved April 17, 2014.
- ^ a b US Government, Department of Justice. "United States Sues to Stop Illegal Grazing on Federal Lands". US Government. Retrieved April 14, 2014.
- ^ "THE ESTATE OF E. WAYNE HAGE AND THE ESTATE OF JEAN N. HAGE, Plaintiff, vs. THE UNITED STATES, Defendants" (PDF). United States District Court for the District of Nevada/Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund. May 23, 2013.
2:07-cv-01154-RCJ-VCF
External links
- Articles to be split from April 2014
- 2014 in American politics
- 2014 in Nevada
- Anti-Federalism
- Bureau of Land Management areas in Nevada
- History of Clark County, Nevada
- Law enforcement operations in the United States
- Political history of the United States
- United States case law
- United States district court cases
- Politics of Nevada