User talk:Wertuose
Welcome!
Hello, Wertuose, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
August 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Khachkar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Serouj (talk) 17:40, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- But I think that your revert is a vandalism, because you reverted all my edits without discussion. How can you prove that my edits are vandalism? Show me extracts from the rules, where written that, I could not put interwikis, or make wikification. I think that you don't know rules, but want to teach others to conform to them. Wertuose (talk) 18:19, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- First of all, khackars are not Albanian. There is not a single khachkar that is written in the Albanian language. Even the khachkar images shown in the Azeri wiki all have Armenian writings on them. Therefore, to repeatedly and deliberately reinsert a false claim into an article is considered vandalism. Serouj (talk) 19:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Then you must revert only those edit, which does not correspond to rules, but not all of them. Wertuose (talk) 04:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Almost all of your edits to that article were inserting false claims into the article. On your last edit you fact-tagged a word (the word "destruction") that was linked to an article full of citations and references - but as Serouj explained, there was "no citation needed for statement - there is whole article on it". The only edits you made that could be argued to be legitimate were the removal of the word "Artsakh". However, just because those edits were legitimate does not mean they were factually correct or should not be reverted. If you really think the name "Artsakh" should be changed to something else you will need to argue for it in the talk page. Meowy 15:25, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Then you must revert only those edit, which does not correspond to rules, but not all of them. Wertuose (talk) 04:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- First of all, khackars are not Albanian. There is not a single khachkar that is written in the Albanian language. Even the khachkar images shown in the Azeri wiki all have Armenian writings on them. Therefore, to repeatedly and deliberately reinsert a false claim into an article is considered vandalism. Serouj (talk) 19:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Reverts
What are you engaging in now on the Khachkar article can be aptly described as clear "vandalism." No serious scholar outside of Azerbaijan has accepted the frivolous theories posited by Bunyadov and his unscrupulous lackeys. Whether you choose to believe it or not is inconsequential but let this message serve as a reminder that by engaging in revert wars (e.g., as in the khachkar article) related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey, you are subject to the general restrictions of the arbitration case as specified here Armenia-Azerbaijan 2. You can be blocked for reverting any article a total of three times in a 24H period, but should you revert an article related to Armenia or Azerbaijan more than once in a week, the same restrictions will apply. You've already violated 3RR. This is your final warning.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 22:03, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- But you can't prove that this objects identifying as Albanian in Azerbaijan. And your blah blah cannot change this fact. So I think you are not right. Interwiki to Azerbaijani wikipedia shows actual position of this subject and point of view of Azerbaijan. As I said neither you nor any other armenian activist can change it. So stop bullshiting me. Wertuose (talk) 19:09, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
I reverted your uncivil edits to Monte Melkonian. Please refrain from such unsourced and NPOV attacks on historical figures.-- Patrick {oѺ∞} 20:17, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- You claim, that ASALA is not a terrorist organization? :) Wertuose (talk) 04:46, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- There's a way to say that without using phrases at are clearly opinionated like "widely known for". Weasel words like that will get reverted whether or not you're adding denunciations.-- Patrick {oѺ∞} 06:17, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Başka dilde makale yaratmak çok zor
Wertuose merhaba.Ben Bahadur.Azerbaycan Wikipedyasından Sortilegus tarafından biliyorsun uzaklaştırıldım.Bence Sortilegus haklı.Uzun süredir uğraşıyorum ve bilmediğim bir dilde makale yazmaya çalışıyorum.(Verdiğin programıda açamadım.World eklenti dosyası olan).Bu sebeplerle bencede yazmasam iyi olacaktı.Hiç bir şekilde kimseye bir kırgınlığım yok.Sizlerin zaten en iyi şekilde makaleler yaratıcağınıza inanıyorum.Sortilegus iletirmisin eğer içinde bir damla bile pişmanlık varsa olmasın.Benim içinde iyi olan buydu.Yaptığım makaleleride geliştirirseniz sevinirim.--85.100.42.44 (talk) 16:48, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Alban xaç daşları
- http://az.trend.az/print/1058855.html
- http://213.172.74.36/print.php?lang=az&article_id=20060316025119091&page=00
- http://www.aztv.az/xbdx/x-1.asp?id=10425&il=2006
--85.100.42.44 (talk) 08:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Borjgali
Borjgali - an ancient Georgian symbol of the Sun and is related to the Messopotamian and Sumerian symbols of the eternity and the Sun.
Sağdaki mezar taşının altında bu sembol var.Bu sembol sanırım albanlardada var.Bir araştırırmısın? (This be carried and there is grave symbol on the right in under. I would consider this symbol and there is Albanian. Investigate) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.100.42.44 (talk) 22:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Invitation
I noticed your impassioned argument at Global Network for the Forecasting of Earthquakes you maybe interested in our group, which helps to rescue articles by adding sources.
Hello, Wertuose. You have been invited to join the Article Rescue Squadron, a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing. For more information, please visit the project page, where you can >> join << and help rescue articles tagged for deletion and rescue. Ikip 00:43, 26 December 2009 (UTC) |
---|
Ikip 00:43, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Armenian quote
Hello Wertuose. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Armenian quote, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. GedUK 18:52, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- OK. Then please, advise me which template should I use in this case? Wertuose (talk) 21:34, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
The source that you are citing does not contain that statement. Five different users have reverted your edit: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Please stop edit-warring and explain your claims on the talk page instead. You might want to read Wikipedia:No original research first.
Regards, HaeB (talk) 19:27, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Global Network for the Forecasting of Earthquakes
Hi.Please join debate. And tell your opinion. --Earth Defender (talk) 11:23, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Could other users check User:MarshallBagramyan expropriation of the entire Kars article.
Could other users check User:MarshallBagramyan expropriation of the entire Kars article. This user constantly erases the other versions of the name of the city Kars in other languages (Template:Lang-hy Kars or Ղարս [ʁɑɾs] Ghars, Template:Lang-az, Georgian: ყარსი Kars, Template:Lang-ku, Template:Lang-ru Kars) , and only lets the Armenian version of the name to stay (Template:Lang-hy Kars or Ղարս [ʁɑɾs] Ghars). Unfortunately this user's ethnocentric POV pushing by ignoring the history of the city, after the Armenian era, is still allowed to stay. He even defends it in the city article talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.194.78 (talk • contribs) 14:30, 10 November 2011
- Please address your appeal to administrators of en-wiki, but at first you must defend your position on the article talk page. Then you can use this talks as evidence of uncompromising position of that user and ask administrators to solve this problem. Wertuose (talk) 17:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's relentless POV additions, lately in the Azerbaijan article.
Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's relentless POV additions, lately in the Azerbaijan article.
This user constantly puts an inaccurate map about ethnic groups in Azerbaijan. Other users correctly remove it, but he puts it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.134.52 (talk) 18:05, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's and User:Nocturnal781's relentless POV additions, lately in the Ermenikend article.
Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's and User:Nocturnal781's relentless POV additions, lately in the Ermenikend article.
These users constantly change the correct article name of Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend". Could all Azeri users prevent the taking over of articles about Azerbaijan by Armenian users with their biased nationalistic POV agenda. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.158.240 (talk) 12:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Algerian genocide page
Could you review and modify the page Algerian Genocide. It was just restored after deletion with the condition to improve it. I saw you have created that page first, so maybe you can help and improve it with more facts and references. Thx. Muminah (talk) 06:31, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
- Could you also consider my post on the article's talk page for re-naming the article to help with WP:NPOV issues. Thanks! Rjp422 (talk) 18:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Armenian terror
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Category:Armenian terror, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. George Spurlin (talk) 10:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Armenian terrorism
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Category:Armenian terrorism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Antelope Hunter (talk) 13:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Your request for undeletion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Category:Armenian terrorism. JohnCD (talk) 21:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Vazgen Sargsyan
Care to provide a source for your recent category addition on Vazgen Sargsyan? Melkonian was definitely a nationalist, but Sargsyan? George Spurlin (talk) 08:17, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Algerian genocide for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Algerian genocide is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algerian genocide until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnCD (talk) 22:43, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Azerbaijani help needed
Hello Wertuose, I'm contacting you because we need some Azerbaijani translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on az.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Azerbaijani Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 19:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
March 2014
Hi Wertuose. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Yorba Linda auto parts, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please do not place anymore deletion tags on articles before familiarizing yourself with the deletion policy and process, particularly, the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Cindy(talk) 06:57, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Could all Azeri users check and prevent the incorrect name change of the article Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend".
Could all Azeri users check and prevent the incorrect name change of the article Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend".
These users constantly change the correct article name of Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend".
This was done unilaterally without any discussion and whithout any (widespread) agreement whatsoever.
Could all Azeri users also prevent the taking over of articles about Azerbaijan by Armenian users with their biased nationalistic POV agenda.
Thank you.