Am a very active autoconfirm user who has never encounter any problems in that involved an administrator. I had read the wikipedia guidlines and I reali understood every section of it. During my patrol I often come across many vandalism, but due to the limit of the right I have (as autoconfirm user) I often find it difficult to fix it. Grant me the reviewer right and I plege to use it constructively and productively without vandalism Wikicology (talk) 02:11, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I find things like not understanding basic CSD criteria despite being very active in new page patrol, adopting RHaworth's brusque "kindly have the decency to wait" wording to editors with apparent conflicts of interest, and apparently claiming user rights the user does not have, to be concerning here. All of these are extremely recent; I haven't done a detailed review of contributions so maybe there is more. (RHaworth does great work, but perhaps we only need one editor taking that particular approach to new editors.) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Admin RHawort is my mentor, infact this was stated clearly on my user page. That account for the reason why am taken his approch sir.sometimes using “kindly have the decency to wait” when concerned with WP:COI policy violation due to its perilous implication on the integrity of this project. in my WP:POV I think it should be treated with strigency. The WP:User right claim is not recent sir, it was only a test (which I ought to do on my sandbox) then but I forgot to remove it before I left. That was a mistake! If it was intentional as you might think I would've relaim it again but it was not intentional sir. I tag appropiately. Only Olaide Olaogun was rejected. I tag the article because its major contributor has a close connection with it. I took time to check all the references,but none was reliable. Perharps the majoy contributor supplied a false information (Wikicology (talk) 10:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC))[reply]
Not done. I'm just not seeing the experience expected before granting this right. You say you have "come across many vandalism" yet I see no WP:AIV reports at all. Get some experience manually reverting vandalism on unprotected articles and then your request will have a much better chance of success. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. While you have done a good amount of article work (which is great) I don't see you reverting vandalism, which is what reviewing is all about. I see you already are using Twinkle, which is a great tool for removing vandalism. Use that for a while, get a few WP:AIV reports under your belt, and your request will have a better chance of succeeding. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since joining the Wikipedia community several years ago I have gained a great amount of experience, for which I am proud. I've enjoyed contributing to the great collection of information that is Wikipedia, and hope to take a greater role by becoming a wikipedia administrator. Thank you for reading and considering my request! SecretName101 (talk) 02:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that my record as a thoughtful contributor to both article edits and policy discussions demonstrates that I can be entrusted with the Reviewer permission, which will enhance my ability to contribute to maintaining the quality of Wikipedia articles. — Jaydiem (talk) 13:30, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Admin RHawort is my mentor, infact this was stated clearly on my user page. That account for the reason why am taken his approch sir.sometimes using “kindly have the decency to wait” when concerned with WP:COI policy violation due to its perilous implication on the integrity of this project. in my WP:POV I think it should be treated with strigency. The WP:User right claim is not recent sir, it was only a test (which I ought to do on my sandbox) then but I forgot to remove it before I left. That was a mistake! If it was intentional as you might think I would've relaim it again but it was not intentional sir. I tag appropiately. Only Olaide Olaogun was rejected. I tag the article because its major contributor has a close connection with it. I took time to check all the references,but none was reliable. Perharps the majoy contributor supplied a false information (Wikicology (talk) 10:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC))
Not done. I'm just not seeing the experience expected before granting this right. You say you have "come across many vandalism" yet I see no WP:AIV reports at all. Get some experience manually reverting vandalism on unprotected articles and then your request will have a much better chance of success. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
