User talk:Frenchman101

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! the panda ₯’ 19:29, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Your recent editing history at Nash Grier shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. bonadea [[S[pecial:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] talk 18:03, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Nash_Grier. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Chillum 18:27, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The reverts in question are:

Before warning: [1][2][3]

After warning: [4].

There are also more reverts prior to those that were not considered in this block. Chillum 18:28, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Given that you were blocked for edit warring over the birth date, is it really such a good idea to remove the birth date again for your first edit after the block expired? —C.Fred (talk) 19:40, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already reported for violation immediately after block expiration. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:46, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, while this edit is in order—I checked the sources and they do report that the video was uploaded in April 2013—it's a revert of a good-faith edit and would count toward the three revert rule. —C.Fred (talk) 19:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So, I am not going to be banned again? (talk)