Jump to content

Talk:List of Indigenous peoples

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 74.97.30.242 (talk) at 02:35, 27 July 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Content of archives

Please discuss all topics from archives on current talk page.

Archive of past discussion (2005-2007)

  • 2 Current listing
  • 3 Sorbs (Wends) do not identify themselves as an "indigenous people"
  • 4 What should be listed under "Circumpolar North"
  • 5 Are Copts considered a people
  • 6 Are the Jews an indigenous people? also Talk:List of indigenous peoples/Comments
  • 7 No more Ainu on Sakhalin island
  • 8 Indigenous Finns?
  • 9 Tongans: A problematic inclusion
  • 10 Removal of two sub-lists
  • 11 Palestinians are indigenous

Archive of past discussion (2007-2008)

  • 1 Request for Comment Palestinian indigeneity
  • 1 Bedouins vs. Palestinian Beouin
  • 2 Bedouins
  • 3 Jews - Martinez Cobo
  • 4 Inclusion criteria for Southern Africa
  • 5 East Africa
  • 6 Terms of reference
  • 7 Zambonji
  • 8 Breakdown
  • 9 Amero-Liberians
  • 10 Proposal for inclusion
  • 10 Table format proposal
  • 11 Samaritans, Jews, Druze, Maronite Christians, Palestinian Christians, Palestinian Arabs, Bedouin.

Bot archiving temporarily disabled

On 15 December User:Wwoods set up MiszaBot archiving for this page with a 90-day timeout, which sounds reasonable. Recently Evildoer187, 72.74.59.228 and Ubikwit have been feuding over the timeout. One of them reduced it to only 15 days, which makes no sense when there are active RfCs that could take as long as thirty days to finish. Since the last bot run took away one of the RfCs, I have undone the last archiving and I'm turning off MiszaBot until the RfCs have been settled. Long term I suggest that the 90 days be restored, but this is up to editor consensus. Evildoer187's statement when he reduced the timeout was "Undid revision 529129762 by Ubikwit (talk) This horse is on its last breath. You have 15 days to present a solid, rational argument for your proposed edits." I think this is on the border of disruptive editing and urge all parties to leave archiving alone for the duration. EdJohnston (talk) 15:13, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Typo - a apart

"the state that they are a apart of" s/b "the state that they are a part of" Chris the speller yack 05:49, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was added with this edit; but it's in a quote - does the original contain the same error? If it does, we should not "correct" it. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why not correct it? I don't have the printed copy, or access to then full original article, but until one can be found, I think this should be treated as a minor typo that should be fixed to spare our readers the distraction. Per WP:QUOTE, "Exceptions are trivial spelling or typographical errors that obviously do not affect the intended meaning; these may be silently corrected or may be retained and marked with '[sic]'". This is not a historic misspelling like the alternate spelling of "PENSYLVANIA" on the Liberty Bell. Chris the speller yack 15:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, Done --Redrose64 (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Israeli Arab conflict tag

No reason for it to be here. Only a weak connection between the two. It is impractical to tag it as such.Pug6666 02:12, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could we get you to read a few section above.Moxy (talk) 02:21, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not my point if you need to protect this page do so in a way that isn't a POV push. Pug6666 19:14, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure you understand what the tag means - noting to do with a POV - has to do with editing behavior - specifically about multiple reverts.Moxy (talk) 20:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian peoples

Someone has inserted Kurds and Pashuns and there's no doubt that part of World is their homeland, but 99% other Iranian ethnicities in region can also be called "indigenous" on such basis: Lurs, Laks, Zazas, Mazandaranis, Gilakis, etc. Since all current Iranian peoples are formed on Iranian plateau (except Ossetians), depending by definition they all should be included or excluded. At this moment I excluded both, any opinion against? --HistorNE (talk) 03:55, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand, Madagascar, and Iceland

Madagascar and New Zealand are present but Iceland isn't. Seeing as these three islands were all settled at around the same time it would make sense to list the Icelandic people as indigenous.