Jump to content

Talk:Lupe Fuentes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 50.152.139.176 (talk) at 00:08, 4 December 2014 (→‎Pre-music career/life needs more info in article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:BLP noticeboard

Origin of his father?

On the page is written in spanish that his father is from Spain, but that city?, and what your ethnic origin? Andalusian, Castilian, Catalan etc ...? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Puszko (talkcontribs) 14:52, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1987 or 1990?

On the Howard Stern Show, Fuentes claims her birthday is 1990. (See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BmgqbfQR-A) Any explanation? Geeky Randy (talk) 03:36, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

She's been active in pornography since 2006. Draw your conclusions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply. However, there is nothing conclusive about this. Please review the controversy section of Talk Dirty to Me Part III and you will know that it is completely plausible that she could have been born in 1990 even though she was active in 2006. Perhaps was should change it to 1990, since Fuentes clearly says she was born in 1990 on the Howard Stern Show? Geeky Randy (talk) 04:21, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
People lie. If she was underage in 2006, there would be reliable sources verifying it just like Traci Lords or Alexandria Quinn. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia is pointless if it is inaccurate, Lupe fuentes is NOT a singer or a dancer, she is a producer and DJ, signed to several important REcord labels

http://www.vibe.com/article/interview-lupe-fuentes-makes-us-feel-so-high

 http://www.dmcworld.net/features/entry/features/lupe-fuentes

http://www.dancingastronaut.com/2014/05/lupe-fuentes-so-high/

 http://notabledance.com/2014/05/10/song-day-lupe-fuentes-so-high/

 http://newsflash.bigshotmag.com/features/29207/

Someone is malicously editing this page to try and revert her career. i am going to bring this to a higher authority because i cant sit around and argue with people who live to simply make this page inaccurate all day long

i have put a 2014 photo up 3 times, only to have some angry editor keep reposting a five year old picture, dont you people police each other or are you only excited to try and prevent me from editing this page because you have no interest in accurate information. maybe you should put that sylvester stallone and tony danza are former pornographic actors in their main description since they both did and that is a fact. oh i forgot, you "screen names" all have some personal agenda .— Preceding unsigned comment added by Evanseinfeld (talkcontribs)

FYI, if you are indeed Evan Seinfeld, the way you are editing Wikipedia is grounds for blocking. See Wikipedia:COI#Wikipedia.27s_position. Nymf (talk) 20:31, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Evanseinfeld:, please try to calm down. We are not here to provide false information but we are also not here to promote the people on which we have articles. Saying that Fuentes was a pornographic actress is true and was her main occupation for years. So to remove it from the article entirely would be like trying to re-write history. While Stallone did appear in a pornographic movie, it was a small time movie and is a minor part of his overall career. In the article about him, we give it the attention that it deserves which is just one paragraph.
Now that you've given some sources, we can look into them and add too, not replace, the information in the article on Fuentes. But that will be done by editors that do not have a connection, either personal or professional, to her. Dismas|(talk) 23:35, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy deletion

I would like this page about me to be deleted, as I find it is overly negative and personally damaging to me.

Please do so in accordance with the following policy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Deletion_of_biographies_and_BLPs

Lupe Fuentes official (talk) 18:26, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You will have to submit an WP:AfD request and it might be deleted, depending on the consensus of the community. Nymf (talk) 18:49, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nationality

Are there an sources for her nationality? Thank you, --Malerooster (talk) 13:30, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to IAFD, she is Spanish/Colombian (her father being Spanish, mother Colombian). --Λeternus (talk) 14:17, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your edits. --Malerooster (talk) 20:50, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guy arrested for having her porn

I removed this section as poorly sourced/covered.--Malerooster (talk) 13:33, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinstated the section with a stronger non-linkrotted source. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:10, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem that notable. Certainly not a "controversy" for her, maybe the guy that got nabbed. Was this covered anywhere else? Needs a rewrite at the least, but I am removing unless there is consensus for inclusion.--Malerooster (talk) 04:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Doesn't seem that notable" should be disregarded under WP:NNC. Proper standard to consider is WP:UNDUE given [1][2][3]. It passes the scrutiny of WP:BLP. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:38, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It needs to be rewritten at a minimum. This seems like undue weight compared to how thin the article currently is. Also, I changed the title section. I will also probable see what the BLP board thinks. Thanks,--Malerooster (talk) 14:03, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Pre-music career/life needs more info in article

The early life section is too thin. The fact is the prior to recently becoming a musician, she was a notable porn actress and even today if you search for her name on Google that fact is made plainly clear. While I understand that to some people being a porn actress is negative thing for one's reputation, it is a well documented fact in this case and something she is largely known for still even if she wishes to change that. That means that at least some info on her former career as a porn actress should be mentioned, provided it is properly sourced. BLP rules do not require we removed "embarrassing" info that us properly sourced and relevant provided it is properly sourced, even if the subject of the autobiographical article might wish to exclude or downplay that info on Wikipedia. BLP guidelines state: "If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well documented, it belongs in the article – even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it.". This means that even if Lupe Fuentes wants to downplay or hide the fact she was a former porn actress as part of reinventing herself, that is not a valid reason to exclude or provide only brief mention of it under BLP policy to do so in and of itself .Sylvester Stallone's one to appearance in a soft-core porn film has a paragraph devoted to it on his article. Lupe was in porn for a good number of years and currently only has one brief sentence mentioning it in the intro, a section mentioning adult film awards she's won, and a section about a court case regarding suspected child porn she was involved in. Thus there needs to be info on her porn actress career in the early life section or a separate section, though how much should be determined by undue weight policy. --50.152.139.176 (talk) 23:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]