Jump to content

User talk:Stifle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TV (talk | contribs) at 01:08, 31 January 2015 (→‎Request Page: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Replies

  • Please reply to me here if possible.
  • If your message is about an AFD or other discussion that you want me to (re)contribute to, I will generally not reply other than by checking the page and adding a comment.
  • I will normally reply here and copy my reply to your talk page, but may sometimes use {{talkback}} or, occasionally, reply here only.
  • Please don't leave your email address. My email address is user.stifle@gmail.com and you can contact me there if you have a request that needs to be answered privately. However, if you email me with a request that is not private, I will respond on your talk page.
    • Exception: if you are requesting the text of a deleted article, then make sure your preferences include a valid, confirmed email address, as I will email the article to you at that address (only).

AfD Andrew E. Unsworth

Hello. Many thanks for considering the Andrew E. Unsworth AfD. One concern I had over the course of this process was that there appears to have been a degree of WP:VOTESTACKING as can be found here. I would be interested in hearing your views. Karst (talk) 12:53, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brp18 Peak Scientific Instruments Ltd

Hi. You had this page I had created deleted due to unambiguous advertising or promotion. It was the first page I had created so I believe I had made some errors with regard to properly citing my information. I have added a request for the page to be created here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Business_and_economics/Companies with relevant third party sources. Will this allow the page to be created? If so will it take a long time to be created this way?

Thanks. Brp18 (talk) 14:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi, this is a request for someone else to create the article for you. It will be done when someone gets around to it; we have no way to predict how long that might be. Stifle (talk) 14:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Snow (attorney)

Can you please userfy the talk page and article to my space. Valoem talk contrib 22:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blac Haze

Hey, the article would have been kept since it was relisted twice and it was more wanted to be kept. Why did you close it? I am going to request a deletion review since I can add how Let Me Holla At Cha was on the charts and Res-Sa-Rec-Shun got an AllMusic review. It was also noted he sounded just like 2Pac. 174.4.163.53 (talk) 07:52, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, deletion discussions are decided based on consensus and Wikipedia policy, not a vote. Notwithstanding that, there were four deletes to two keeps. I believe my closure was correct. Stifle (talk) 11:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, well could it be restored or sent to me by email? I think more people would want it kept if asked as well. Bozo33 (talk) 06:47, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can do that, but can I ask what you propose to do with the article if I restore it? Stifle (talk) 11:06, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd improve it, and show it to people for their opinion to know what to improve so it can be put back on Wikipedia. 174.4.163.53 (talk) 23:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can't userfy it for you though, unless you create an account. Stifle (talk) 12:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seventeen Article

Hey there, I'd like to know why the Seventeen article was deleted, since I did provide (and was ready to provide more if needed) reliable sources to site their song released, concerts and features in songs/MVs. If it's because "they haven't debuted yet", shouldn't the iKON article also be up for deletion? I don't see how the Seventeen article was violating Wiki's policies. Aquamaraqua (talk) 23:50, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seventeen (band) explains why the article was deleted. I implemented the consensus of Wikipedia users on the subject. Each article is considered separately on its own merits and we are unable to take into consideration arguments comparing articles to others. You are free to nominate any article for deletion if appropriate. Stifle (talk) 10:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
My question wasn't really answered though. I was part of the discussion. No replies whatsoever on the fact that there were many (reliable) sources that accounted for Seventeen's various activities. Aquamaraqua (talk) 04:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion discussions are determined by consensus and this is the standard I applied to the discussion closure. You are welcome to list at deletion review if you believe my closure was not in compliance with Wikipedia process, but deletion review is not merely a second bite at the cherry because you disagree with the outcome for reasons previously presented. Stifle (talk) 09:37, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Randles

Do you have any objections to having Paul Randles restored to Draft:Paul Randles? I saw some potential sources in the AFD, and I have one of my own, so I would like to give a try to working on it. BOZ (talk) 19:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request Page

Hey there -- Are you able to put the deleted page[1] in a sandbox for me? Never got a chance to save the data in case subject becomes more notable. Thanks! --TV | talk 01:08, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stifle&oldid=644923852"