Jump to content

User talk:Jetstreamer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Calin.pirlog (talk | contribs) at 21:26, 4 March 2015 (→‎Airbus A330 / Turkish Airlines). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Reversion in TAP Portugal

I don't know what kind of reversion you may have made in TAP Portugal page according to your justification, since TAP Portugal doesn't fly to Tel Aviv, nor any other city in Asia. Nupest 0:10, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Finding reliable source

Hi jetstremar I am runaparvin you told me if I want to add anything I have to add a reliable source but how can I add a reliable source changing the destinations? Please help me adding a reliable source but I can't understand why not you changing the page of us-bangla airlines.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Runaparvin (talk • contribs)

Now 18th worst disaster

And still the 4th worst *at the time*. Please read the commit / diff information "Jetstreamer" before reverting changes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_New_Zealand_Flight_901 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voigty (talk • contribs)

hi, here is the info for KLM year round Bilbao service

http://news.klm.com/air-france-klm-2014-15-winter-schedule-26-october-2014--28-march-2015-en/

Air France-KLM 2014-15 winter schedule (26 October 2014 – 28 March 2015) KLM continue to serve the routes launched this summer: to Bilbao (Spain) and Zagreb (Croatia).— Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.61.27.46 (talk • contribs)

Re: Ethiopian Airlines accidents and incidents

Hello, Jetstreamer. You have new messages at Mattwheatley's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your allegations about my unverifiable edits

If you are unhappy with an edit, it is reasonable to ask for a source. It is not acceptable to make false allegations that my edits are unverifiable and make threats leading to my being blockied from wikipedia without good cause. A search on the web would have led you to find the information I posted on wikipedioa as being verifiable. Please play nicely with other editors. Pmbma (talk) 21:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pmbma: You have had a number of warnings from me at your talk page regarding your addition of unsourced claims into articles. Maybe it's time for you to take a look at WP:VERIFY, a policy here. And the act of supporting your edits with reliabe sources relies on you, per WP:BURDEN. Neither me nor anyone else will do the job for you.--Jetstreamer Talk 21:59, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PLUNA destinations, orphan status

You wrote

Undid revision 645850467 by Thnidu (talk) It's an orphan, actually. WP:ALSO applies for parent article.

I looked at WP:ALSO and didn't see a word about orphan status. Where are you getting this from? Please {{Ping}} me when you reply. --Thnidu (talk) 16:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Thnidu: First of all, newest threads at bottom, please. Regarding WP:ALSO, it says
You did exaclty the opposite at PLUNA, i.e. you added a link to the ″See also″ section that was already in the body of the article. Crystal clear.--Jetstreamer Talk 00:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sorry about the positioning. I tried to put my thread at the bottom, but I was using my mobile device and the beta version of the mobile website, and it wouldn't let me -- or I couldn't figure out how to do it. And once I was done and saw it in the wrong position, I couldn't find a way to edit it to include this explanation and apology. I'm on my laptop now. I'll make a bug report on Phabricator. (edit: see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88885)
  • I didn't see that there was a link in the body of the article until after I'd added the "See also". By that time it was late and I was tired, and editing on the mobile page is more difficult than on the desktop page, and sometimes very frustrating. I figured I'd do it in the morning, but by then you'd already fixed it.
  • The positioning and the duplicate link were my errors, but I still don't see a source for your statement that "WP:ALSO applies for parent article". I'm not going to make an edit war about this, but unless there is an actual policy about it, PLUNA destinations is not an orphan as long as it's linked from PLUNA.
  • On the other hand, as long as PLUNA destinations is up, it should make it clear that this information is no longer meaningful except historically. PLUNA is gone, and even the destinations not marked there as "terminated" are no longer served by (the now nonexistent) PLUNA. That's why I added "PLUNA ceased operations as of 5 July 2012" (as is stated and cited in the lede of PLUNA), which you removed. Yes, I should have sourced it then; and now that I have restored that text, I have included a full citation. At first I used the original source page rather than the WebCite archived copy, but after looking at your userpage I understood the value of avoiding potential linkrot and switched it to the WebCite ref. --Thnidu (talk) 04:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptair Ecommerce edits

If you don't mind, I have an editing comment and a policy question (not a challenge) about Talk: EgyptAir#Semi-protected edit request on 11 February 2015.

  1. You opened a plainlist template but didn't close it, so the list is bulleted and the opening code is visible.
  2. Would it be appropriate to point Egyptair Ecommerce toward WP:COI? MilborneOne has already pointed up Wikipedia:Username policy in writing a Welcome on their talk page, but this is a different issue. OT1H, if the user works for or represents Egyptair, it is a potential COI, but OTOH it's nothing like advertising or advocacy, just a matter of sourcing, as you've already pointed out to them.

To discuss this, please {{Ping}} me. --Thnidu (talk) 20:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Thnidu: I don't mind. Regarding point 1, I've fixed the open template issue. It was created by Egyptair Ecommerce in their request [1], not by me. As to point 2, I don't think appropriate to recall WP:COI for the user (at least for now). It was indeed a matter of sourcing, and it hasn't been completely solved yet. A third user made modifications not fully supported by the sources given.--Jetstreamer Talk 21:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Though I've been editing WP for quite a while, there's a lot I don't know about policies, customs, and so on. --Thnidu (talk) 01:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kota Bahru / Kota Bharu

Howdy. I noticed that you reverted an edit of mine to the article Malaysia Airlines destinations, giving "WP:NOTBROKEN plus these are the names appearing in supporting sources" as the reason. Currently Kota Bahru is flagged as a mis-spelling of Kota Bharu; {{R from misspelling}} advises that links to mis-spellings of articles should be updated to use the correct title. There would seem to me to be three ways to resolve this;

  1. If Kota Bahru is in fact a correct alternative spelling, that redirect shouldn't be marked as a mis-spelling.
  2. If it is a mis-spelling, but it's use in the target article in this form is important it can be flagged up as such using {{Sic}}
  3. If it is a mis-spelling and there's no good reason to have it there, it should be corrected.

Cheers. - TB (talk) 21:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Daallo Airlines & Jubba Airways

Hi Jetstreamer. Daallo Airlines and Jubba Airways apparently just officially signed an agreement to form one larger company [2]. Assuming that this is the normal procedure for such conglomerations, could you please merge their respective pages? Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 21:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Middayexpress: Hello, Middayexpress, hope you're doin' fine. I think it's better to raise the matter at WT:AIRLINE so we can discuss how to proceed with this. All the best.--Jetstreamer Talk 10:39, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About Ecuatoriana de Aviación

Ecuatoriana de Aviación never flew to Israel, Spain, Bolivia or Costa Rica. Someone should change that false information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.215.236.138 (talk) 17:32, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use the article talk page, please.--Jetstreamer Talk 18:23, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cox's Bazar Airport

Hi I made a change on Cox's Bazar Airport wiki page but you removed it as incorrect information, but the fact is Biman Bangladesh Airlines is going to resume its flight to Cox's Bazar Airport from Dhaka, Bangladesh. They posted it on their website (www.biman-airlines.com) as well as many mainstream bangladeshi media have covered the news http://bdnews24.com/business/2015/02/19/biman-to-resume-flying-on-5-domestic-routes-from-apr-6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.65.244.51 (talk) 22:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I used the url you provided to mark the resumptions at Biman Bangladesh Airlines destinations. Despite WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT explaining how to add future destinations to airport articles, please contact me if you don't know how to add this information to the rest of the articles.--Jetstreamer Talk 22:19, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vistara destination table

People keep changing format removing country name and adding IATA/IACO columns which are not needed any more, keep a check if possible, thanks.139.190.230.234 (talk) 06:20, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. The latest version [3] includes the format agreed by consensus at WP:AIRLINE.--Jetstreamer Talk 12:49, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The latest format edit was reverted, read edtiors note in history, he thinks that its not standard policy the table layout. 139.190.230.234 (talk) 23:27, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm watchlisting the article from now on.--Jetstreamer Talk 00:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Airbus A330 / Turkish Airlines

Hello, Jetstreamer

You have removed both my contributions regarding the Turkish Airlines Airbus A330 incident at Kathmandu because you have considered them not notable (I am referring to the contributions on the wikipedia pages dedicated to the Airbus A330 Turkish Airlines). May I know why have you considered them "not notable" since this was an incident which resulted in a seriously damaged aircraft and one injured person?! I believe that removing them is a abuse, therefore i would need to know the motivation behind your actions.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calin.pirlog (talk • contribs) 13:16, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Calin.pirlog: I'm not the only one removing them.--Jetstreamer Talk 13:53, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Still, you have not answered my question. Why is this kind of accident considered not notable?

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jetstreamer&oldid=649894803"