Jump to content

Talk:Przemyśl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 195.49.150.66 (talk) at 22:22, 19 March 2015 (→‎Inflammatory anti-Russian/Russophobe text. history rewriting). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

one

maybe move Przemysl,_Poland to Przemysl Fqsik 19:35, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Nyah, the disambig should be there I think. [[User:Halibutt|Halibutt]] 19:24, Oct 14, 2004 (UTC)

The quip about the town’s web site is hardly NPOV, making a highly inflammatory deduction from rather innocuous language. It should be removed. 212.17.66.70 23:03, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Half the links here seem to be advertising restaurants and catering in Przemyśl. I think they should be removed. This sort of thing really belongs on wikitravel imho. --Filipek (talk) 14:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"It became part of the Polish kingdom in the second half of the 13th century." - Is this an attempt to add one more century of Polish rule to the history of the city? This sentence should read "14th century". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.12.8.34 (talk) 10:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In 2006?

I find this text in the article: "In 2006, it became part of the Subcarpathian Voivodeship; it was previously the capital of Przemyśl Voivodeship." Voivodeships were changed in 1999. Is there something unique here that happened in 2006?  Randall Bart   Talk  01:49, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed this as well. It was written in this edit from 2 November 2008 and there seems no reason why this was any different to the rest of Poland. Przemyśl Voivodeship ceased to exist in 1999. SeveroTC 06:51, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Q re Zbig

Z. Brzezinksi was born in Warsaw according to his page, why is he a notable person here I wonder? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnpdeever (talkcontribs) 21:18, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Inflammatory anti-Russian/Russophobe text. history rewriting

"After the invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, the border between the two invaders ran through the middle of the city". Obviously no one claimed that Poland was invaded by the Soviet Union if that were the case Britain would have declared war on the USSR, but it declared war only on Germany. Soviet forces entered territories of the Russian Empire after the state of Poland ceased to exist and there was no Polish government in Warsaw. This was internationally acknowledged at the time and no major (or as far as I know minor) state lodged any protest. While I understand that the Wikipedia is an ideological project run by CIA and different ethnic / national interest groups, this example of history re-writing and re-labeling goes too far.

Second comment pertains to the stubborn insistence to call Ruthenian inhabitants Ukrainians, there is no document in Austria or later in Austria-Hungary, not a strip of paper that would call those people Ukrainian. This is an attempt to attach a newfangled artificial identity onto people in the past, probably more bizarre than referring to the Celtic inhabitants of Gaul as the "French". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.196.81.181 (talk) 09:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thus spake the Russian nationalist anon.Faustian (talk) 14:10, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agreeing with the first Anon. Faustian has a history of anachronistically referring to Ruthenians as Ukrainians. Unlike other Ruthenians who were forced into the the Ukrainian endonym, the Lemkos in this region did not suffer that fate. They have remained Carpo-Rusyn Ruthenians, not Ukrainians.