User talk:SNIyer12

This is SNIyer12's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

If I have left you a message: please answer on my talk page, else inform me.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|SNIyer12}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

ANI notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AutomaticStrikeout 20:47, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please comment at the ANI discussion?

Please comment at the ANI discussion...right now the consensus seems to be some sort of ban, which means I would suggest you explain yourself there. v/r Go Phightins! 02:57, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Hello, I'm Go Phightins!. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 2011 Washington Redskins season without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Go Phightins! 04:03, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, particularly conducting slow edit wars to introduce your own opinions into articles. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In order to be unblocked, you must be prepared to discuss your own behaviour, and show that you understand how you have been causing problems. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note that user is suspected of block evasion.—Bagumba (talk) 08:00, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SNIyer12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My apologies for not being on for a while. I'm very sorry for my rude behavior. I was just editing details in pages as to why they were necessary. I've learned from my mistakes and I'm ready to move on. I have just been busy with work. But I believe that I've learned my lesson and will not make this mistake 15:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You'll have to address the past issues in greater detail to enable us to ascertain that you have understood why your behaviour was problematic and to tell what you'll do to prevent those issues from re-occurring. Huon (talk) 21:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A note to any admin looking at future unblock requests, the user has continued with the same edits that caused the indef block through multiple IPs and has had to be blocked on them many times. I'd suggest it be put before the community to decide on an unblock before one is made as he has been a prolific problem editor. -DJSasso (talk) 17:28, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Kepner listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tyler Kepner. Since you had some involvement with the Tyler Kepner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 22:59, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

U Party With Fox News listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect U Party With Fox News. Since you had some involvement with the U Party With Fox News redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]