User talk:Blueberry Hill

Welcome!

Hello, 3Q Digital Harte Hanks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 21:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boston Celtics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin McHale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Wikipedia does not allow user pages started by a corporation or business. This could get an editor banned from WikiProject. I just wanted to let you know. Thank you-RFD (talk) 20:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Template:Z17--Orange Mike | Talk 22:05, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blueberry Hill (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Blueberry Hill (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I did not know therule. I'm only interested in making compliant contributions and when another Wikipedia editor tipped me off that I was in violation, I immediately deleted the promotional language from the page (which happened before I was blocked). I have no interest in making promotional edits and I pledge not to make any in the future.

Decline reason:

We need a list of all instances in which you, or your employer, has received payment for the edits you have made -- as required by the Terms of Use -- before we consider unblocking you. MER-C 12:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Blueberry Hill (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Blueberry Hill (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

This is the only instance...and per Wikipedia policy, I disclosed the relationship. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_Greenberg_(executive)&action=history

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Huon (talk) 16:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Château Montebello, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Master Builder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

University of Vermont

Please note that, per WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is not considered a reliable source and should not be used in citations. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 16:24, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Blueberry Hill. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Swissôtel Nankai Osaka, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 00:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to hotel articles....

...have been reverted. If you have changes you would like to implement on behalf of your clients, please make suggestions on article talk pages, per the instructions on WP:COI. Your edits have been entirely too promotional for Wikipedia, which is not a promotional medium. BMK (talk) 02:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also do not see any declaration on the article talk pages or here or your user page of your client(s), as required by our terms of use. Putting "Disclosure: client" on the edits is not sufficient. Please provide full disclosure. BMK (talk) 02:04, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not enough to disclose, you also have to write in a neutral, encyclopedic mannet, not like a PR flack or a prootional brochure, and you are clearly incapable of doing that. Please do not edit any articles directly, make suggestions on the talk page only. I will seek sanctions against you if you continue to edit directly. BMK (talk) 02:15, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your ArbCom request

If I were you I would probably withdraw your request there, as it isn't the proper venue to jump to. Consider it the supreme court of Wikipedia, you have skipped several lower courts which can help. Like WP:DR or WP:3O. Looking through your edits I think you may have a WP:BOOMERANG hit you in the head as your edits have been extremely promotional and not acceptable to Wikipedia standards. If you have questions please leave them here and I will do my best to answer them.McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:58, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mcmatter...thanks for the advice. I did what I was did because Ken threatened me with sanctions and I didn't want to get into an edit war with him. I'll gladly withdraw and take the case elsewhere if elsewhere is where the case should go. I'd rather work with him on his issue of concern (I did inadvertently write over a recent edit he did) and end this dispute. How does one withdraw? Blueberry Hill (talk) 15:12, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Add to the bottom of your statement at Arbcom that you wish to withdraw this request. Then hopefully someone will come and close it and remove it but it may take a bit. I doubt the case would be accepted anyway.McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:15, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough...thank you for your advice. Blueberry Hill (talk) 15:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]