Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Komal Jha

Komal Jha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Rsriprac (talk) 03:27, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Deletion_of_biographies_and_BLPs

This person is relatively unknown. Reference sources do not exist or is of questionable credibility. IMDB profile also shows very little about this actress. Articles sounds like self-promotion article. Please queue this article for deletion.

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 September 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Fails WP:NACTOR and subsequently WP:GNG. Perhaps a new article in a decade or so when she has more experience. scope_creep (talk) 08:54, 29 September 2015

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 08:17, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 08:17, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Am the actual creator (User:Lamokahj) of Page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komal_Jha . The page i created was not for Self Promotion and the person listed in the Page is not unknown. There are many Links in the page which supports my claim. I agree that the subject here is a living person (upcoming actress) and hence there is not much details on IMDB Page. I would like to revoke the deletion decision of this article. However, if there is something in the article that has been added by random users which shows self promotion, please help us by deleting that improper content but not the whole article. Let me know if any concerns. 103.16.69.13 (talk) 18:47, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're Premier Pegasus Consultants LLP. We have a presence in India and our team has confirmed that the actor mentioned on this page is a known public figure. An upcoming actress, indeed - nevertheless, she has several films to her credit and it would be kind if the profile on Wikipedia could stay. In case you need citations from credible newspapers in the country, write to Simon Steele, our senior partner in the UK office [simon@premierpegasus.com [+44 (0) 203 695 3 734]] or Soumik Roy in our India office [soumik@premierpegasus.com]. Your support in this regard would be very kind.

Delete Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:ENT, and WP:GNG - maybe some day, but not today. It is WP:TOOSOON Scr★pIron^IV 18:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 20 refs, seem sufficient for GNG. Actor has 10 films to credit. I don't see how TOOSOON applies to this. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:04, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG. Many of the references are broken or have questionable sources. Premier Pegasus Consultants LLP seems to be a marking group that does promotions for actors, questionable motives. Additionally, PremierPegasus only contribution ever is to support keeping this page. Rsriprac (talk)

@Rsriprac - You seem to slander and consider yourself an authority on the lives and businesses of people around the world. Please refrain from making libelous remarks against entities and people that you do not know about. Before questioning the agenda of those supporting this actor and her page, could you please clarify your motives? Your comments reek of malicious intent at every stage. Tread with caution. Your profile does indicate that you have spent your entire life contributing to these Wiki pages (and you would be respected for that) lest you try to use your past efforts to cover up wrongful acts. Your Wiki user-page says, "IF SOMEONE CLAIMING TO BE ME OFFERS TO CREATE A WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE FOR A FEE, IT IS NOT ME." That could indicate that you're taking the pains to stir trouble in the life of this actor because you're either being paid by someone to do so or because you have rotten plans in your head. I mean, if we were to "freely" speak our mind in our comments, those could be things we could accuse of. No? At the end of the day, I apologise if we've hurt you or your sentiments in any way. Let's forgive and forget and leave this page alone, as a favor to us and everyone else who is genuinely interested in this actor. Thank you!

For your reference, here are links to media articles about the actor. She is indeed famous, even if you don't know her. This template must be substituted.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movies/news/Komal-Jha-to-make-her-Bollywood-debut/articleshow/35481032.cms http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/telugu/movies/news/Will-Komal-Jha-be-second-time-lucky/articleshow/28292607.cms http://www.supergoodmovies.com/32032/sandalwood/komal-jha-is-nimbe-huli-herione-news-details

@PP_SimonSteele - You being Editor-in-Chief at Premier Pegasus and how motivated you are in creating an account to keeping this page alive makes make think of you having dubious motives. It is worth calling out that Premier Pegasus is a marketing/promotions company http://premierpegasus.com/digital-marketing/4589922397, looks like a conflict of interest. Rsriprac (talk) 03:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now actually as this could be another system matter and there could be better sources but I'm not seeing much convincing so delete for now until a better more solid article can be made. SwisterTwister talk 05:47, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]