Jump to content

User talk:Opencooper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zombie Blender (talk | contribs) at 14:28, 4 November 2015 (→‎Nobita Nobi). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Opencooper, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Seinen manga

I'm hesitant to group seinen manga as a subset of adult comics. Seijin manga are quite clearly 'adult', but seinen manga magazines can include strips that appeal to younger boys. The ability to read kanji is perhaps the main factor dividing shonen from seinen.

I've created a separate category for the publishers, and retagged the entries.

I think it's probably best to include the magazines as comics. I'll clarify that in the first paragraph of the adult comics article.

Thanks for taking the time to look these things over, and respond. Dongord (talk) 03:44, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now I'm working on relabelling some of the categories and entries, so there'll be less redundancy. Thanks for all the tips. I'll take a look at HotCat.Dongord (talk) 08:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Other editors are removing my 'adult comics' tags from Japanese manga, giving the same explanation you did, so it looks like I'm in the minority here. I think I'm just going to leave it for now, but feel free to revert the tags if you like. Dongord (talk) 14:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Snap Skill page

Snap Skill is a non profit organisation whose main aim is to provide free services to its members and recreate an atmosphere in the Indian education system in which basic facilities of knowledge and information are provided to all students without any prejudice of caste, creed, financial status and color; which in fact, are the main factors which hold back the under-privileged students of India to come out with flying colours to benefit the society and the nation . Snap Skill consists of only students. These students working in snap skill, are not paid in money or in kind. The students working in snap skill are working in alignment of what the organisation stands for and are trying to be the change they want to see in the world. -- Sir/Madam, this page has been collectively drafted by the students in snap skill. Students of the age group of 18-21yrs who are in a constant process of building up their knowledge and skills. We do accept that we did not deliver a Snap Skill wikipedia page which conforms with all the guidelines. Which is not because we want to market our organisation, but in fact, due to our lack of knowledge in formal business writing . It is our humble request to the wikipedia community to help us in editing the draft from your side and making it more unbiased, and to re-activate the page on the main nameserver so that we are able to reach out to more students like ourselves who want to see a change but lack the opportunity to do so.

Thanking you, Snap Skill — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theprakharsharma (talkcontribs) 11:56, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a reply to you on the article's talk page. Opencooper (talk) 12:33, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Sir, Snap Skill as an organisation has been active since 2 years. And according to company policy we don't entertain any requests for third party publications and promotion. That is why there has not been any significant independent sources of information. Sir I wanted to consult you, if we make the content more-encyclopedia-friendly then can we still have a mainserver space? And how much time do we have before our article gets deleted? Thanking you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theprakharsharma (talkcontribs) 14:16, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Theprakharsharma: Well unfortunately that's how the notability policy works. You can read more about why Wikipedia has these requirements here. Also just so it's clear, I'm just a regular volunteer editor in the English Wikipedia as you are. I don't have any special deletion rights; those are given to administrators. I merely proposed the article for deletion. As I noted on the talk page your article is likely not suitable for the English Wikipedia, but that will be for an admin to decide. You could save the article to the draft space or your user page and work on it, but you'd have to prove that it is notable using reliable sources or it would likely be nominated for deletion again except this time it would be for non-notability. Lastly speedy deletion means the decision will be made when an admin sees it, but if they decide a "speedy" deletion isn't appropriate, you'll obviously receive more time, but it could still be the subject of a "deletion discussion". Please see the deletion process for an overview. Opencooper (talk) 14:44, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Dormition of the Theotokos Church, Labovë e Kryqit

Sorry for my delay & thank you for taking time to review the wp:dyk nomination. I've just replied in the nomination page.Alexikoua (talk) 17:56, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Opus (manga)

Hello! Your submission of Opus (manga) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! David Eppstein (talk) 05:26, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Opus (manga)

Materialscientist (talk) 13:16, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Opus (manga)

Materialscientist (talk) 13:16, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Allegra Versace

If you want to, you can take a look at the article about Allegra Versace. That article is this weeks TAFI.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:12, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nobita Nobi

Hello the Article is about an Animanga Character hence falls under WikiProject Anime and manga so I guess it will be a under the notability guidelines.Zombie Blender (talk) 05:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zombie Blender: Falling under the scope of a WikiProject does not say anything about notability. WikiProjects merely exist to coordinate work on related articles; think of them as broad categories. Please read through the general notability guidelines linked at the top of the article to understand what constitutes notability and what is required to demonstrate it. As it currently stands, Nobita Nobi is comprised of original research and uses unreliable sources like Wikia. What it needs is multiple reliable sources talking specifically about Nobita. Opencooper (talk) 06:39, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, kindly use the {{Wikia content}} template to properly attribute the Creative Commons licensed text you copied from WIkia. WIkia and WIkipedia's both have a license that requires attribution to the source. Presenting the text as your own is a violation of copyright and a very serious offense on WIkipedia. You should have learned that the first time you copied within Wikipedia for Shizuka Minamoto and it was almost deleted. Opencooper (talk) 07:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I didn't know about the Wikia tag. Thanks for the Information.