User talk:Dyb450303

Welcome!

Hello, Dyb450303, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mechanical stability of nanoparticle agglomerates aerosolized from nano-powders, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TallCorgi (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mechanical stability of nanoparticle agglomerates aerosolized from nano-powders

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mechanical stability of nanoparticle agglomerates aerosolized from nano-powders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from URL. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TallCorgi (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Mechanical stability of nanoparticle agglomerates..."

Hi Dyb450303,

I'm sorry for marking your article as a copyright violation; I didn't see that your publication was Creative Commons licensed. That is very generous of you to make it an open access article! One thing to think about is that even if it is Creative Commons licensed, it probably is not appropriate for a whole article of its own. Since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it brings together many different secondary sources to present a general overview of human knowledge. Each article is like an entry in an encyclopedia. If there are articles related to the subject of your research, it might be appropriate to reference your findings there (I'm afraid I don't know anything about nanoparticles, so I can't give you any specific advice). However, it's important to consider WP:SELFCITE, which says that when citing yourself, you should be careful not to give undue emphasis to your own work. If you're not sure how to proceed, the Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions board is a good place for new editors to get help. TallCorgi (talk) 00:10, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mechanical stability of airborne nanoparticle agglomerates (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FoCuSandLeArN was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mechanical stability of airborne nanoparticle agglomerates and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:55, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dyb450303, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:55, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Powder Dustiness

The article Powder Dustiness has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTDIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 00:33, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Objection of Deletion of Powder Dustiness

Hello, thanks for the efforts in evaluating the article. However, the page is not a dictionary definition of the term "powder dustiness", although it may read like so from the first sentence. The page intends to explain powder dustiness, its testing SOPs (standard operating procedures) and the significance for occupational exposure and human health risks. This is a rapidly blooming field of research and this page will welcome new results to be filled in, building up a more comprehensive understanding on this topic.

Thank you for a re-evaluation of the content.

Best regards, Yaobo Ding — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.143.143.66 (talk) 08:35, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mechanical stability of airborne nanoparticle agglomerates concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mechanical stability of airborne nanoparticle agglomerates, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mechanical stability of airborne nanoparticle agglomerates

Hello, Dyb450303. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Mechanical stability of airborne nanoparticle agglomerates".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]