User talk:Anna Frodesiak

If I started a thread on your talk page, I am watching. Please reply there.

To leave me a message, click here.

For my availability, image uploads, admin actions, access issues, and disclosure notice, click here.

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60

‎John's rainbow effect

hi Anna can i ask you who are you and what give you the right to delete my account john's rainbow effect? you didn't give time to answer and you didn't motivate why you want to delete it, you only sad i me it up. i guess you don't have experience with optical illusions? my account mister rainbow was made wrong. john — Preceding unsigned comment added by John's rainbow effect (talk • contribs) 18:41, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(by talk page stalker) @John's rainbow effect: Anna was elected an administrator, which is what gives her the right. Since you're new here you should try reading about changing your username and assuming good faith. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:51, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John's rainbow effect. I am sorry to make you sad. You are very welcome here. I was just doing what I thought was right.

20:42, 23 May 2016 to 17:01, 25 May 2016 you worked on the draft.
00:05, 24 May 2016 I searched for the subject, found nothing to indicate it is a real thing, then asked at your talk page for some sort of source. You ignored me and kept working on it.
23:26, 24 May 2016 I said I would delete it soon. You ignored me and kept working on it.
21:09, 25 May 2016 I deleted it.

So, I think I did tell you why I wanted to delete it. And I did give you time to answer, or rather, opportunity. Twice, you ignored me and kept editing it. Why didn't you just communicate with me?

Anyway, I'm sorry that I upset you. You are very welcome here. I can give you a copy of the draft if you ask. Most importantly, why not answer the question about whether or not you made it up? I can find nothing on the Internet about this. If this is notable, I will help you move it to the main encyclopedia to be an article. Does it have a non-English name?

Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

dear mister page stalker , can we work to find a away what i have to change about my text to get it worked in the future to post on wikipedia? greets john — Preceding unsigned comment added by John's rainbow effect (talk • contribs) 19:18, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anna i am sorry to i overreacted maybe little bit , i understand you job to. i would appreciate if you we can work together to get my article in the right shape to get it published. so i actually did not know that my article was published already in some kind of way. no its not made up, actualy my optical illusion is tested at adults and children, you can aks me anything you want, no problem. there is only a english name, i am from belgium and get some help to translate it in english greetings john — Preceding unsigned comment added by John's rainbow effect (talk • contribs) 19:27, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John's rainbow effect. You are from Belgium? Wonderful. I love Belgians. Welcome! So, the first thing to save everyone time is sources. Please paste some reliable sources here. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:41, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Belgium's are nice Anna , you know why.. because we have great chocolate :-) . i will be very honest with you Anna, i didn't publish my article any where else yet, i though to start with wikipedia first. i didn't want to just put my article and picture on internet because i don't want my information get stolen, if you know what i mean. i need save and relialbe place.

i can tell you a little bit more about the history if you like, i thought i don't write to much about the history of discovery of the john's rainbow effect because i wanted to be clear as possible with facts in the article. the pictures of the rainbow colors is made in the day time around 14:00 , the discovering came when i was looking at the picture at home in my phone and then i saw the rainbow diseppear. i went to search and search on the internet and couldn't find any thing about this, the only thing that came close was the troxler effect, but after intensive research the result came out that troller effect works much different.

greetings john — Preceding unsigned comment added by John's rainbow effect (talk • contribs) 19:51, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John. I do not think it can be an article. This is your discovery, right? Please read WP:42. I am sorry. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Also please read WP:OR and WP:MADEUP. You see, Wikipedia is not the FIRST place things get published; it is the LAST place things get published. We are an encyclopedia, so we can only have articles about things that have already been published and written about in other places. Good luck with this and maybe it can be an article after it has been published and written about by third parties. --MelanieN (talk) 20:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

it is an optical illusion test it for yourself its amazing, in the mean time i will work on the sources joke. greets john — Preceding unsigned comment added by John's rainbow effect (talk • contribs) 20:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

oke, i will see to publish it on other places first, thanks for help for now Anna, greets — Preceding unsigned comment added by John's rainbow effect (talk • contribs) 20:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Good luck. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anna i am working to get some reliable sources to make a wikipedia page. how many sources do i need? — Preceding unsigned comment added by John's rainbow effect (talk • contribs) 19:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John's rainbow effect. As many as possible. All! :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment i am talking with; Prof. Michael Bach PhD, Eye Center, University of Freiburg. he is specialist in optical illusions , you will find a website of his work if you google.we are talking also about my optical illusion effect. i will keep you informed, greetings john — Preceding unsigned comment added by John's rainbow effect (talk • contribs) 22:52, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John's rainbow effect. I understand. Of course, if media publications do not discuss this in detail, there is really no way it can be an article right now. You would need several reliable sources too. I do not want to be discouraging, but I do not think this will end up being an article in the near future.

Also, please post any response below this text and not at the bottom of the entire page. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

i also work on media publications — Preceding unsigned comment added by John's rainbow effect (talk • contribs) 06:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's good news, John. But of course, if you self-publish to make it a reliable source, it probably won't be. This subject should be notable according to others first. See what the wise and wonderful MelanieN says above starting with "...Wikipedia is not the FIRST place..." Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

yes i understand now it is not the first place where things get published. but i have to talk with proffesors about my subject. and if they want to publish it or give a comment it then it is there choice of course. greetings john — Preceding unsigned comment added by John's rainbow effect (talk • contribs) 11:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Oh, and again, please post any response below this text and not at the bottom of the entire page. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anna i am trying to find out how i can post not all the way in the bottom of the page, maybe like this, greetings — Preceding unsigned comment added by John's rainbow effect (talk • contribs) 12:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you've done it! :) Cheers! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Unidentified peppermint"

Hi Anna,

Following up on your lemon basil pictures discussed at WT:PLANTS, the species name is not correct. Someone had made a wild guess at Lemon basil, which is now corrected. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 12:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. Please comment at Talk:Basil#Lemon_basil. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My comment was just that O. citriodorum is a synonym of O. africanum. I don't know what you are growing, and different cultivated forms exist in several basil species that have quite different aromas. The mint fragrance sounds like this, which is said to be either this or this, but elsewhere those species are said to mostly smell like lemon or lime or clove. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 13:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm thinking it's americanum now. Wider leaves and no lemony smell. I'll inspect it more closely in the morning. Many thanks for the response. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know much at all about essential oils. Wonder if it's menthol or something else that smells like peppermint. Anyway, it turns out that I have access to the Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants from 2003 to present, so if you come across a citation to a promising article in there and don't otherwise have access to it, let me know on my talk page. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 18:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for taking the time, Sminthopsis84. I will do some more digging and take some more photos. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:48, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Okada

Hello, you just deleted a page about salem legend "Nicholas Okada". He recently was named gatorade athlete of the day. He is also a Professional League of Legends player. He is a local hero and I would appreciate it if you didn't delete his page. He is my idol. He is a best friend to all the children in town. Nic once made minute rice in 57 seconds. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE UNDERSTAND, he got a Golem in RS '07scape. He also has most Pk's on Rainer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dakdak12345 (talk • contribs) 04:36, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dakdak12345, please read WP:42 and do not recreate that article. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jeff Janis is drunk

Hello Anna,

I see that you have blocked the account User:Jeff Janis is drunk as a sockpuppet of Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own. Did you do this based on Checkuser evidence, or based on the message he posted on my user talk page? If it is the latter, I highly doubt that this is actually Tikeem Cumberbatch. Actual Tikeem Cumberbatch socks usually have scatological usernames and create vandalism pages, and have not been known to tag other sockpuppet accounts. The username and behaviour of this account seems to be more typical of Starship9000, who has been going through a perplexing phase lately where he pretends to be other sockmasters (most notably Supreme Genghis Khan) and falsely tags, or requests tagging, of his own sockpuppet accounts as those of another user.

Thanks, Passengerpigeon (talk) 05:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Passengerpigeon. No CU. I just figured it was him. I think you are right. I've removed the socktag but kept him blocked as he is obviously a sock of someone. If you wish to keep the username on record to add to an SPI if it is opened again, please do. Thank you kindly, my friend. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:35, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and User:I will fart in your stupid face? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I'd have to say that's still Starship9000. Although the username is rude, usernames of actual Tikeem Cumberbatch socks are more like (excuse my language) "User:Peepoopfartbutt69" or something along those lines (see Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own). Also, editing userpages of sockpuppets is again not typical Tikeem Cumberbatch behavior (note the lack of edits to the sockmaster's userpage until the two accounts you mentioned came in). Passengerpigeon (talk) 13:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I trust your judgement, Passengerpigeon. Thank you for swapping in the right socktag. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:42, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure who it's related to, although I just checkuser blocked three other accounts, and they claim to be Supreme Ghinggis Khan. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 23:19, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kelapstick: So you say your checkuser turned up no results? On one hand, this outcome is common for socks of Supreme Genghis Khan as he edits from a highly dynamic IP range; but on the other hand, the behavior of those accounts seems to point more towards Starship9000's imitation of Supreme Genghis Khan than the actual Supreme Genghis Khan. Passengerpigeon (talk) 03:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Passengerpigeon, it turned up five accounts (two were already blocked, the other three I blocked), but nothing to immediately suggest a relationship to Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own (although I didn't dig that deeply). --kelapstick^(bainuu) 03:19, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kelapstick: Which five accounts do you mean? The two listed in this talk page section plus the three you just blocked? Finding no connection to Tikeem Cumberbatch is what I would expect based on behavioral evidence, as stated above. What I wanted to know was whether the CU connected the accounts to Supreme Genghis Khan - if not, it is most likely Starship9000 imitating SGK (I know the sockmaster is active at the moment as he recently created the account Wíkipedians killed in a nightclub shooting, which corresponds to his "house style" of sockpuppet account naming.) Passengerpigeon (talk) 04:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing linked to Starship or SGK, other than the statement at User:The Crawling King Snake. The five accounts were JJ is drunk, the three I blocked, and, something about McRibs, I can't recall the actual username. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 04:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kelapstick: Well, in conclusion, if CU turned up nothing then it would be safe to assume this is actually S9000 rather than SGK based on behavioral evidence. Passengerpigeon (talk) 04:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold!

What could happen? BMK (talk) 02:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BMK. We both know the answer to that one. :) Anna F remote (talk) 10:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2009 in Malaysian football listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2009 in Malaysian football. Since you had some involvement with the 2009 in Malaysian football redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 17:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:20, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Error in the "Nephrotoma quadrifaria" distribution.

I have located and clearly photographed many times the "Nephrotoma quadrifaria" in Cantabria (nord coast of the Iberian Peninsula). Its distribution data, which excludes of all this territory, is therefore not correct. Thanks for your good work in any case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.58.188.232 (talk) 23:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I've removed the content from Nephrotoma quadrifaria. Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A quick note

Hello. After looking into the history of the user known as Thewolfchild, I notice that you had words with him some time ago. You seem to be more familiar with him than I am. I am bringing this up because a few months ago, I had an incident with him here: [1] I desperately wanted it to end peacefully, and it ultimately did, but the incident still left a bad taste in my mouth. I did not appreciate the fact that he resorted to direct insults. Directly calling me "whiny". Even if he perceived that insulted him (I didn't), he had no right to retaliate by resorting to direct insults. He clearly wanted to have the last word, (and he ultimately got it). He also claimed that his edit summary was "obvious". Well, of course he thinks it was obvious, because he wrote it. He also implied that it is ok for admins to be rude.

Please, please do not ping him. That is the reason why I did not link his username. I have no room in my real life for drama right now. I do not want them to come after me, and I do not want anymore trouble with them. Please note, I am not asking that you do anything. You don't even have to respond to this message if you don't want to. I just wanted to make sure that someone else was aware that this happened. That's all. I feel that something like this should not go unnoticed. Thank you for your time. :) Wikicontributor12 (talk) 03:53, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikicontributor12. Thanks for making me aware. He hasn't edited much lately, so maybe he's thinking about things and taking time off to enjoy life. I hope that, if he does return to regular editing, he will have a new and improved manner. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:05, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. Take care. :) Wikicontributor12 (talk) 04:50, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome, Wikicontributor12. And do not worry. Wikipedia is a very transparent place. Everybody sees everything. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Professor page

Hey, I'm working on the "Tony Muilenburg" professor page, and it is being debated for deletion. Any suggestions on what I can do? -Thanks