This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Makk3232(talk | contribs) at 20:53, 22 June 2016(added comment with a question). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:53, 22 June 2016 by Makk3232(talk | contribs)(added comment with a question)
Delete Lack of sources, and the article lacks notability by notability guidelines. As it stands does not meet Wikipedia criteria. Many links are Primary, nothing reliable that is secondary as the article uses mostly blogs as sources. There are many YouTube personalities with large followings that do not meet Wikipedia's standards for a stand alone page. I do not feel based on the current setup of this page that this individual ranks in that category either. In short fails Fails WP:GNG, and fails WP:BASIC, as most information available via Google is Blog based, or interview sources, nothing Primary. Makk3232 (talk) 04:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't demonstrate enough notability for inclusion. The only sources cited (and the vast majority of sources that actually exist) about her are blogs. Not enough mainstream media coverage. This girl could potentially become notable in the future, at which point an article would be appropriate, but now's not the time. Eventhorizon51(talk)18:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per nomination, blogs do not constitute significant coverage, and somehow slipped by wikipedia moderators upon creation. Seems very promotional including links to twitter, youtube, facebook of this person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.250.253 (talk) 20:52, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Blogger and some of the negative links may even be a BLP violation. (And when yours truly !votes delete, that really should count double! ). Montanabw(talk)05:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
