User talk:Luna Santin

Talk – Sandbox – Blog

Welcome to my talk page! I'll sometimes reply on your talk, but will frequently (increasingly often) reply here.

When leaving messages, please remember these easy steps:

• Use a ==descriptive heading==

• Use [[wikilinks]] when mentioning users and pages

• Sign your post with four tildes ~~~~ to leave your name and date

If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia or frequently asked questions.

Click here to leave me a message

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28.

LA's userbox consolidation discussion; a side project I occassionally help out with, to reduce the number of superfluous userboxes.

Admin

Congratulations! You're now an administrator. Two pages you might find useful are the administrators' reading list and the administrators' how-to guide. Good luck with your new role. Angela . 15:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was the first to see this! 'Grats. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 15:14, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. enochlau (talk) 15:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Those vandals won't stand a chance! :) --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 19:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! jam es^(talk) 22:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'FUCK YES' YOU WILL TOTALLY PWN THE VANDALS NOW BUDDY! :D --CableModem 03:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! Well done. Here's a mop. -- Samir धर्म 07:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! You'll definitely be a very good admin. :) --WinHunter ^(talk) 08:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CTho's Userpage

Just an FYI — I know CTho personally, and my edit was not vandalism. He's added it back in himself, albeit on a subpage :) Brock256 21:48, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry >.< i suck

thanks though...and my question was only for help creating the pageSuperme 23:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Vandalism Patrol...Sahaj Marg

Gee! I have seem this Wikipedia system at work and it's great!! Thanks so much for your "interception". Information will set us free! I can now believe it!! I have been to the Mountain and I have seen the face of G.. NO! just kidding...LOL

I am now a "bigger booster" of Wikipedia...Everyone in my circle (seniors) told me this Encyclopedia would never work!! I now have some evidence that it does and on the "honour" or "anarchically"...LOL I wonder if we can now push for "voting on line and on issues in a "DIRECT DEMOCRACY"??? HMMMM! The revolution has begun....Information is now in the hands of the "masses"...Rise up, Rise up....LOL...

4d-don

What is with it

Anita934 how many has she created? Sugarpine^t 01:02, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning she won't be creating any more accounts for a while due to the fact he's created 5 or 6 accounts. I heard somewhere you have to wait 24 more hours to create another one. Is that right? Also, I'll let you know if she comes back tommorow. Can you add Template:Indefblockuser to all of them? Sugarpine^t 01:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!!

Thank you for blocking Great_American_Football_Genius AND Rzandy just in time!

@kshay 07:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page.--Andeh 08:01, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

O'Reilly double-standard

Hello, you unfairly blocked me from editing O'Reilly and called what I did vandalism. This is nonsense. What I added was well-cited and demonstrably more balanced than what was there. You're also not enforcing the 3R rule for people who are changing MY additions even though, as all is extensively documented, there's no hint of a libel possibility. You make repeated references to civility but only a fool thinks being civilized only refers to omitting words middle-class assholes find offensive. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.116.69 (talk • contribs) 08:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Nevertheless, you did violate WP:3RR, and very probably do need to read over WP:CIV. You're more than welcome to file a report at WP:AN3 if you feel other editors should be blocked for similar reasons. Luna Santin 08:39, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is your conduct, not mine. How do I go about reporting it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.149.54.179 (talk) 12 September 2006.

I see you've already found a spot; good luck, for what it's worth. Considering edits like these [1][2] and your 3RR violations, the block is perfectly in order. I don't have any opinion on the content dispute; I haven't participated in it, and have no current plans to -- community disruption, on the other hand, worries me. Edit warring and personal attacks will lead to blocks; if you play nice, you have nothing to worry about from me. Luna Santin 05:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You characterized my *Bill O'Reilly* edits as vandalism That's just a naked lie. You know it, I know it, anyone who looks at it knows it, so don't try to pretend you're just trying to protect the community. You're abusing the tiny bit of authority you have, pure and simple. As I said when I reported you, I'm not blameless. But the bigger issue is you propagating your little ideology by mischaracterizing what I did, which--don't forget--came first.

Thanks for the block

Thanks on that. Rsm99833 10:13, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

An unregistered user thought it would be a great idea to vanalize your usertalk page. I've since reverted it back to a previous safe version.--Saintlink 10:46, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Thought your nominator should leave a congratulations message on your talk page. Use your mop well. Sir Luna Santin. :) --Nearly Headless Nick 11:44, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism to my talk page

Thanks for reverting it. Regards. SteveO 13:11, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for September 11th.


Volume 2, Issue 37	11 September 2006	About the Signpost

Carnildo resysopped	Report from the Hungarian Wikipedia
News and notes	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and International Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC) [reply]

STAR TV

Please do not put DISNEY CHANNEL & some STAR MAGIC HBO/MAX PACK package on the STAR TV Article...

DISNEY CHANNEL (DISNEY CHANNELS & PLAYHOUSE DISNEY) is not a part of STAR and they is no such thing as a STAR MAGIC HBO/MAX PACK package in STAR, they are not a cable tv.

You are just vandalizing the article.

Eve215454 13:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User: Uberrascht

I tried to manually remove this article myself and you reverted back to the old state. I want this "article" to remove all references to me. It was created as a joke in poor taste by a friend without my authorization. Please contact me at nii@ahene.com for confirmation of identity.

Thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.113.168.141 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough. I've nominated the article for deletion at MfD -- go ahead and follow the link to contribute to the discussion. Luna Santin 20:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Could you block User:Anita949 a sock of Anita934? Here we go again...Sugarpine^t 22:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go raibh maith agat!

File:Ireland 37 bg 061402.jpg

Hi there!

Thank you so much for supporting my RfA! It ended up passing and I'm rather humbled by the support (and a bit surprised that it was snowballed a day early!). Please let me know if I can help you out and I welcome any comments, questions, or advice you wish to share.

Sláinte!

Congratulations on your own recent successful RfA too, by the way! Cheers hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 23:13, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keystroke logging continues to be controversial

Luna,

I was wondering if you might revisit this little controversy regarding the Keystroke logging article. You offered some opinions earlier, before you decided to back out before it became a revert war :) I don't blame you at all, and in fact I have been specifically not participating in the little revert war -- but I think at Fedia's request I am going to give it one last go to find a compromise/consensus. It would be helpful if you would weigh in. If not, that's cool too. I hope all is well! --Jaysweet 05:03, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]