User talk:DVdm
|
|
— Welcome to my talk page —
— Canard du jour —
|
|
|
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, DVdm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Response To Division By Zero Alteration
Hello! Thank you for taking the time to consider my edit and additional material for the wikipedia article Division By Zero. Also thank you for your time and consideration for the article Santangelo Fields (S-Fields) mathematics. I respect your decision with regards to these matters.
As the material is very new I understand creating new articles is a hasty move and not appropriate at this time. However with regards to editing the article Division By Zero, is there any way that you would consider the following:
Inserting in an appropriate place in the article Division By Zero (as determined by you) a passage stating that this work is extremely new and the source was just recently made available to the public and verification is in process but if true then there would exist a new algebraic structure called an S-Field in which a/0 can be defined for all non-zero elements which belong to a Field such that for distinct, non-zero Field elements a and b, we have that a/0 and b/0 are also distinct? We then cite the arxiv website so readers can then access the paper themselves if they wish to confirm or prove false?
or something to that regard?
Again, thank you for your time and consideration regarding this manner, B. Santangelo (SSJSurfndude4) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssjsurfndude4 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- Please put new talk page messages at the bottom of talk pages and sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks.
- @Ssjsurfndude4: please note that Wikipedia is not a publishing service for our own work and original research—see WP:NOTFORUM. Also, your comments should go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santangelo Field (S-Field) mathematics, where other contributors can comment. Cheers. - DVdm (talk) 15:51, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Generally "original research" should not be included in Wikipedia articles, and that essentially means that things can be included after there are refereed secondary sources about them, but not before. See WP:OR. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:30, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
about Alternatives to general relativity
Hi, sorry for sourcing, but you are more speed than i. I prepare the text on Word, but past/copy is long to do ( formula too ), so i'll do it as quick i can. A solution for me ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuturdu13 (talk • contribs) 18:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- Please sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks.
- @Tuturdu13: I suggest that you first put a little section on the article talk page pointing to this edit, proposing what you have in mind. Might save some time. Don't forget to sign the talk page message with the four tildes. - DVdm (talk) 19:34, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Reality, Society and Geographical/Environmental Organization: Searching for an Integrated Order
This book about geographical philosophy is a serious scientific literature. Give it back:
- Hampl, Martin (2000) Reality, Society and Geographical/Environmental Organization: Searching for an Integrated Order, Prague: Charles University, Faculty of Science. ISBN 80-902686-2-5 - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.168.13.98 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Please sign all your talk page messages with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks.
- Perhaps, but given your location (gw.vurv.cz, Crop Research Institute, Prague) you seem to have a conflict of interest promoting it all over the place. See wp:SPA and wp:FURTHER, which also points to wp:ELNO. As I understand it, you are spamming. If you think that this book should be mentioned in, for instance, article Cosmology (as you suggested with this edit), then by all means open a section at Talk:Cosmology and propose to add it. - DVdm (talk) 17:13, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
November 2016
Hello DVdm,
I added the section and I am planning on editing it. Thank you for your feedback. Next time I remove any content I will explain why. Oliverk25 (talk) 17:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- OK. Using edit summaries, please explain every edit you make. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 17:22, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Frank Zappa
Hi
I am here because I was looking at the history on the Coatlicue page and I saw you then I went to your profile I like Frank Zappa Joe's Garage album
Can you recommend anything similar — Preceding unsigned comment added by EggsInMyPockets (talk • contribs) 23:28, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
- @EggsInMyPockets: yes, from the same period, try Sheik Yerbouti, Tinseltown Rebellion, and, for an album with spectacular vocals, You Are What You Is. There's more, but start here
. - DVdm (talk) 09:27, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- @DVdm: sheik yerbouti is great, wow. i was actually thinking in the middle of it that i was going to close it but i stuck with it and sides 3 & 4 just blew me away. i will tell you what i think of the other two when i get around to hearing them. EggsInMyPockets (talk) 01:20, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- "Many well-dressed people... in several locations....are kissing quite a bit..."
- DVdm (talk) 09:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- "Many well-dressed people... in several locations....are kissing quite a bit..."
- @DVdm: sheik yerbouti is great, wow. i was actually thinking in the middle of it that i was going to close it but i stuck with it and sides 3 & 4 just blew me away. i will tell you what i think of the other two when i get around to hearing them. EggsInMyPockets (talk) 01:20, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Hans Jonatan
Hi DVdm, thanks for getting in touch. I would like to make changes, correcting errors and adding important material. I am the author of the biography that you kindly mentioned (with a slight error in the subtitle). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gislipalssson (talk • contribs) 14:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- Please sign all your talk page messages with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks.
- @Gislipalssson: Ok. But please don't change every occurence of Jonatan to Jonathan in the article. The article is Hans Jonatan, not Hans Jonathan. - DVdm (talk) 14:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. Yes, there's lot's to learn. I have to leave this now, but I will be back, adding images and text, if you don't mind. I appreciate your contribution and your help. Gislipalssson (talk) 15:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- OK. Happy editing! - DVdm (talk) 07:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Koide edit
I had or have no intention of mischief of vandalism
It seem impossible for you to have taken the necessary time to evaluate my content addition for merit or accuracy. I truly ask you to go back over my attempted edit as the "auto edit bot" unduly labeled me a vandal.
(((3e+8 * ((0.9 / ((0.5^0.5) / (pi / 4)))^2)) / c) / 3) * 2 = 0.666659496558 s / m
(0.9*π/(sqrt(0.5)*4))^2*2/2.99792458 = 0.666659496558
Koide Formula
David.fuller@live.com
http://i57.tinypic.com/102v0gh.jpg
If it could even be added a listed possible Numerology for now , I would be satisfied with that
Currently there is no explanation of the Reason for the Koide Ratio, so the whole page is really Numerology No offense or antagonism meant or implied
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+(0.9*%CF%80%2F(sqrt(0.5)*4))%5E2*2%2F2.99792458
No. I meant exactly what I posted, not by mistake, not experimenting - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1015:b107:beaa:b551:5289:8096:3c49 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not the place to publish our numerology exercises. See Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_publisher_of_original_thought. - DVdm (talk) 07:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Bird
Zack Bird was taken in the Rule 5 draft by the Rangers. I just moved him to their respective minor league page. It just came as section blanking probably cuz I'm a IP. 24.162.134.57 (talk) 15:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, I overlooked your edit summary. My apologies! - DVdm (talk) 15:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
HI,you made the mistake,see other language in wiki.
Maradona club stats is wrong.Argentinos juniors 166 apps.totall apps 588.thank you. see this website.Argentinos juniors 1978-79 apps 26 http://www.football-history.net/who-is-who/m/diego-maradona.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maradona fans (talk • contribs) 17:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- Please sign all your talk page messages with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks.
- Hi, Maradona fans, this unexplained removal was rightly reverted by user Prayer for the wild at heart, and this unexplained removal was rightly reverted by me. If you don't use edit summaries, your edits will very likely continue to be mistaken for vandalism, and you could end up blocked. So, in your own interest, please provide an edit summary for all your edits. Good luck. - DVdm (talk) 20:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Adding Pictures...
I need help to add a picture on my bio on Wikipedia... Any help? Heru101 (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Heru101: you can put a help template message on your user talk page. See {{help}}. Good luck. - DVdm (talk) 16:13, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Four-dimensional space
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fourth_dimension&oldid=prev&diff=752858285
Four-dimensional space - is about four spatial dimensions, right?
Spacetime - is about 3 spatial , 1 temporal, right?
let me know if I'm missing something.
skakEL 12:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- Oops, yes, you are right. I have undone my revert: [1]. My apologies, and cheers - DVdm (talk) 12:39, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Bender Edit
Hi. I never made an edit to the Bender page. A work colleague was playing a joke on me and he made the edit. Are you saying he did it from my computer (I.P address)? 207.164.26.34 (talk) 16:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, over there at WorldLinx Telecommunications where a lot of users share the same IP to connect to the outside world, if indeed a work colleague (or your wp:LITTLEBROTHER
) did it, then as the message on your talk page says: If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. - DVdm (talk) 16:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Richard Feynman
Would you be interested in co-nominating this article at FAC? Unfortunately, it will be ineligible for TFA, as it was featured on December 2, 2004. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Hawkeye7: I just had my first look at wp:FAC. As for the modifications since GA (August 2016), I removed a few obvious inappropriate see-also-entries and, yesterday, that one TED-section. I haven't really scrutinized the remainder of the changes, so I'm not sure whether I will be able to properly react to possible reviewer objections. If you don't think that this is a problem, I'd be glad to co-nominate, even if I couldn't find how to technically do that in the documentation. - DVdm (talk) 12:35, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- I'll handle all the details. The problem is that I am allowed to have only one FAC nomination open at a time, and I have a long queue. However, I am allowed a second nomination if it is a co-nomination. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:37, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I read about that rule in the FAC. Let me know what I can do to help it get started, because I have no idea
. - DVdm (talk) 21:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- Already started. This usually takes a long time.
Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, there's no rush. Interesting process, this. Thanks for having involved me. - DVdm (talk) 11:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Already started. This usually takes a long time.
- Yes, I read about that rule in the FAC. Let me know what I can do to help it get started, because I have no idea
- I'll handle all the details. The problem is that I am allowed to have only one FAC nomination open at a time, and I have a long queue. However, I am allowed a second nomination if it is a co-nomination. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:37, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at Tests of special relativity shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - 158.39.3.89 (talk) 12:32, 19 December 2016 (UTC)