Talk:Wham!

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Musicians B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Mid-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

London B‑class Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Rock music B‑class Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pop music B‑class Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Changes

RE: this: "In November, they released I'm Your Man which went straight to #1 in the UK charts.". It didn't - it had a week at No.2 before it went to No.1 if I remember rightly. Please change this if you like. Jim Mason.

Young Guns was the first hit single and Wham Rap the second single. I will change the text. You can do it now. If you don't do it, I will do it sooner or later. Crimson 19:29, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

Throughout the article, the name is shown capitalied, as WHAM!, but the article is at Wham!. Should it be moved? (I'll move it myself if no one objects). Dylan 15:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is the band's name even capitalized in such a fashion? I've always known it to be "Wham!". --Matharvest 07:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A similar discussion made with the German group Neu!, while it was often written in capitals as NEU!, it's use was a symbol. But it was really Neu! I agree that it should be changed back. Chadwholovedme 13:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Referring to artists

The artists should be referred to as "Ridgeley" and "Michael" not as "Andrew" and "George." Lmr5069 18:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Is Wham! gay?

Only George Michael.

Did George Michael fancy Andrew Ridgely? --Timtak 05:35, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Pope! a Catholic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.225.65.157 (talk) 17:52, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources/references

There seems to be a lot of unsourced material and speculation in lines like:

"George's father had just fired his son from the family's restaurant believing he overloaded the dinner plates" or "the contribution of Ridgeley as the group's image specialist and spokesman was crucial to the band's initial success"

Whoever added some of this more anecdotal info needs to source it, or it shouldn't be here. - AKeen 16:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to add sources (and that wasn't me who wrote it either) but I know that the second comment can be sourced to the George Michael documentary that came out in England two years ago. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.183.100.99 (talk • contribs)

The source http://www.jango.com/music/Wham+Holiday+/_full_bio?l=0 is used, but that page explicitly says that it's sourced from Wikipedia, so it seems to be a completely invalid (circular) source. 74.89.25.196 (talk) 00:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please write from a historical perspective

These pages are not intended to be the George Michael announcements service, and the tone of the last two sentences is approaching user confrontion, which I'm all for if placed on THIS page and not in the article itself. Please try to keep in mind that you're writing for the ages here (or hopefully you are intending to...). As such, notices with short-term intent do not serve the article itself and are perhaps mistreating the usage of the Wiki as intended by its creators. Thank you to all who respect others contributions and especially to those who constantly clean up after me, I appreciate it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.183.100.99 (talk) 06:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Whamesw.jpg

Image:Whamesw.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wha,.jpg

Image:Wha,.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:43, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Whamesw.jpg

Image:Whamesw.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

'The record was not playlisted by BBC Radio 1 in the UK, partly because of the profanity in the Anti-Social Mix. Subsequently the reissued UK release replaced the controversial lines in the first verse "B1, B2, make a claim sign your name’s all you have to do" and the opening two phrases of the second verse citing "Mr. Average".'

why is the B1, B2 line controversial? 81.96.247.50 (talk) 23:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wham! → Wham – Stylisation of artist name, similar to Kesha or Korn, thus should be removed. --The Evil IP address (talk) 20:49, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The difference to Ke$ha or KoЯn is that the exclamation symbol (!) is mentioned as it is to express that, exclamation. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:12, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I'm not sure I understood your point correctly. Would you mind explaining it more detailed? --The Evil IP address (talk) 15:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That the exclamation is supposed to be mentioned. Furthermore, there are many articles that have this format (and do not use your OSE arguments) such as Up! (1976 film) or Woo!. MOS:TM has nothing to do with symbols like ".", "," "¿?" or "¡!". Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 17:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The articles you cite are different in that they are articles about published works, which is a different thing than artist names. Furthermore, I'd be interested why punctuation doesn't apply to this guideline. In fact, I've seen supports here to remove trailing punctuation from such article titles (the article was moved to something different in the end, but still...) --The Evil IP address (talk) 16:55, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can answer that only from my perspective. The ya in "KoЯn" is a stylized r as User:Tbhotch notes below and is not normally used in English sources. Punctuation such as trailing periods/fullstops in melody. or moe. is easy enough to use but can confuse readers expecting a trailing period to end a sentence. (Will.i.am does not cause this problem but does have capitalization issues.) Use of a trailing exclamation mark, though unusual in running text, is not likely to cause a problem since exclamation marks are rarely used as punctuation in an encyclopedia (N.B. Yahoo!). If you are looking for absolute consistency derived from slavish adherence to stylistic orthodoxy, I can't offer that. I try to weigh each case by the standards of both fidelity to the name of the entity and to the needs of a reader of a general reference work. — AjaxSmack 02:12, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Everyone gives this subject as "Wham!" See Amazon, New York Times, Worldcat, and The Independent. Kauffner (talk) 13:34, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The same argumentation was opposed recently at Talk:Kesha#Move request. --The Evil IP address (talk) 15:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - And the diference is that you don't say "Kedollar signha" or "Koyan". Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 17:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- allmusic also gives "Kesha" and "Wham!". (Compare the first line of running text.) Although "Ke$ha" is official, it is such an odd spelling that most readers assume it is a stylization and look for her as "Kesha".[1] We don't have to resolve all the borderline cases. This subject is simply "Wham!" and is given that way by the RS across the board. Kauffner (talk) 02:56, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (see comment above). — AjaxSmack 02:12, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

More Citation Neededs Needed

This article has nowhere near enough "citation needed" tags. Some of the sentences are still virtually readable; in fact one or two entire sentences have no "citation needed" punctuation at all. This is clearly unaccepatable. Please add more. For example "Wham were [citation needed] a popular[citation needed] beat combo[citation needed] in the early[early according to whom? discuss] 1980s[citation needed]". That kind of thing.82.71.30.178 (talk) 20:40, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

'Stand by Me: AIDS Day Benefit' concert, 1987

hi. in the 'Post-Wham! and George Michael's death' section, it should be mentioned that ridgeley performed w/michael on stage at this concert. here's a video of their doing 'everything she wants' there:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuGomJ02oWg&t=2m29s

and the imdb page for the televised event: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0209348/

63.142.146.194 (talk) 20:53, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]