User talk:Materialscientist

Please leave your message at the bottom of this page, for example, by clicking "new section" at the top. I shall reply wherever you prefer. If I replied on your talk page, it means I am watching it, and there is no need to add the {{talkback}} template or quote the previous message.
If you came here because I reverted your unsourced change, cite your references in the article you edited; there is no use bringing them here.
I turned off most notifications in my preferences, and therefore can't see pings, sorry.

January 2017

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. An edit that you recently made to Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 02:19, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why would a 'test' have a suggestion to see the talk page for details, and a paragraph explaining that there is clearly an error in the leded, that there are primary sources suggesting that the error exists (specifically that the 'Late Returners Club' has 0 links BUT Wikipedia being quoted, but the Late Arrivals Club has millions of hits, including academic and primary sources) and outlining how the error was probably made before correcting it? That's some dang strange test if you ask me. However, I'm not going to the effort of fixing your mistakes, so if you want to fix another 'error' I suggest reverting your revert and reconsidering WHAT you revert in future. One of the reasons I gave up editing Wikipedia after being a Wikipedian since it's first few months of inception is the brigade of mass reverting buffoons on here that make it utterly redundant. It's good to know I was validated in my leaving. 124.190.207.57 (talk) 04:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Sockpuppets of UnderArmourKid

Hi, Materialscientist, nice to meet you, It appears that the following users: SuperTailsX, SrGuillester, LazerBlitz and UnderArmourKid2017 are actually Sockpuppets of UnderArmourKid, is that true? Abdullah Almarri - A.W.S.T. (talk) 09:36, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IP 79.141.141.197

Hi, noticed you warned the above user today for a test edit. Would you be willing to take a look at their multiple edits to Emmeline Pankhurst which seem a mixture of cosmetic and unsourced changing of facts? Not comfortable with reverting all 11 of their edits as some look OK, but I don't have time at the moment to pick through and validate them all. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 11:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgur - not just links but all the information removed

Hi, thanks for the information about the bulgur article change. Unfortunately, you didn't only remove the link but also the information about the content of gluten. I believe this information should be part of the article because it is relevant (and important for consumers). If you didn't like the link, it wasn't very difficult to find an appropriate one, was it, since the content of gluten in bulgur, firstly, is a generally known fact, and secondly, can also be inferred from the fact about wheat that bulgur comes from. En.wp is not my home wp so the deletion doesn't really bother me. Being detected by "a tool used to detect and revert vandalism" doesn't please me at all, of course, since I really meant well :-) --cheva (talk) 18:58, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External brigading of page

I noticed that you made reversions to this page but didn't revert all of the vandalism. Would you mind reviewing the request on the protection page and rolling back edits?