Jump to content

User talk:Caseyjonz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 77.171.92.12 (talk) at 18:31, 12 May 2017 ("Mine Hill Railroad" & "Mine Hill and Schuylkill Haven Railroad": new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Caseyjonz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 08:59, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The text was copied from http://home.comcast.net/~phstakem/rr/TQC/EBRR.html by User:Pstakem - I don't think there's a problem here. --NE2 17:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gaithersburg Station

If Gaithersburg (MARC station) and Gaithersburg B & O Railroad Station and Freight Shed, are the same station, I'm going to merge both articles. I'm also going to tell the creator of the Gaithersburg B & O Railroad Station and Freight Shed article about this. ----DanTD (talk) 22:20, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit. Going down the list:

  • Ampersands were no longer in reporting marks by 1987, when the C&O briefly entered Maryland.
  • I can't find anything reliable showing CVRR as a reporting mark. Most of the lists found online are copied around, so an error on one will propagate to all. [1] is my main source, which is idnependently compiled from the Official Railway Equipment Register, probably the only reliable primary source listing reporting marks. As for its incorporation date, the ICC valuation report describes how the Cumberland Valley Railroad only acquired the Maryland property when it merged with the Franklin Railroad in 1865. (However, it leased the Franklin Railroad in 1860, so I'm correcting that in the list.)
  • Similarly, I can't verify the GC&C reporting mark. Since the George's Creek and Cumberland Railroad merged into the Western Maryland in 1917, and was actually operated by the WM since 1913, it's very unlikely that it had a reporting mark.
  • The same source shows that "NCRY" was assigned in 2000, possibly for this tourist line. The old Northern Central was leased by the PRR in 1911.
  • Ditto for WVC&P, except that doesn't appear in any reporting mark list I can find. For the incorporation date, see the ICC valuation report: the West Virginia company was created in 1881, through a renaming of the Potomac and Piedmont Coal and Railroad Company, but a same-named corporation was incorporated separately in Maryland in 1882.
  • The Western Maryland merged into CSX in 1989, per Moody's Transportation Manual: [2]

--NE2 06:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I have nominated Benning Road, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benning Road. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dough4872 03:10, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Western Maryland Railway

Western Maryland Railway did not actually enter the city of Baltimore. It served as a link to Western Maryland from Owings Mills, where the Northern Central Railway terminated. If we consider Baltimore County part of the Baltimore Task Force, then perhaps Western Maryland Railroad should be included. Otherwise, maybe it shouldn't.

Of course, Northern Central, which did indeed enter the city, should be included among the subjects supported by the Baltimore Task Force. So I've added it. Folklore1 (talk) 01:03, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored WM to the Baltimore Task Force. Folklore1 (talk) 14:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the copypaste tag (and providing the source too!) on that article. I have removed the copied text and the template appropriately. Minimac (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Caseyjonz! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

A tag has been placed on File:William Robinson (1840-1921).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Caseyjonz (talk) 22:16, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Catawissa Railroad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WR Draw

Seem to be having trouble with adding map, could you give a hand with WR Draw? Thanks Djflem (talk) 07:05, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Baltimore and Lehigh Railroad

Yngvadottir (talk) 16:03, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metrolink (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Norfolk Southern Railway lines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morrisville, PA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Park Place – Hudson Terminal

Two days ago, I nominated your article on the Hudson & Manhattan Railroad's Park Place – Hudson Terminal service into the Newark – World Trade Center article. Feel free to enter the discussion on this merger. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 17:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Baltimore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern seaboard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PW&B

Thanks for your edits at Philadelphia, Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad; it's nice to see someone else take an interest in the line. PRRfan (talk) 13:48, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of citation templates on Automatic block signaling

I noticed your excellent work copy editing Automatic block signaling. Your improvements are much needed and highly appreciated! However, please do not remove citation templates, such as {{Cite book}} and {{Cite web}}, as you did with this edit. Citation templates help us standardize citation formatting across all articles, track usage, and easily update formatting in the future should grammatical handbooks change. – voidxor (talk | contrib) 08:26, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Edits on Frederick and Pennsylvania Line and Little Pipe Creek bridge...

Good morning... I saw your recent edits on these pages... I would like to know more about the changes you made but there is no talk section material to work with that outlines your proposed changes, however thank you for adding abbreviated detail in the edit summary ... Given that, I am requesting you to elaborate on some of your short hand notes below ...

What is c/e?

I think I understand you moved the company letterhead graphic over to the info box, hence, infobox, moved ext links to separate sect., + cat; adj images;

Since the PRR leased and then later bought the railroad why do you consider a graphic of the PRR letterhead they used to operate on the railroad off topic? (del PRR letterhead (off-topic))

In the case of the USRA work on Little Pipe... I agree on the citation needed but the notes laid out the source of the material in this case a state of Maryland report, I will fix that issue and remove the flag...

As a newer editor... I now understand the policy towards external links and appreciate that edit.. but I am at a loss to understand the graphic edits... I will research the wiki style manual on this and propose an alternative that should be acceptable to all... I will come back to this page and post my proposal ... thanks Risk Engineer (talk) 13:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eckhart Branch Railroad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wills Creek. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of railroad executives, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DB. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trains Portal and Railways Portal Merger Proposal

You seem to be well acquainted with rail transport material, so I'd like your input on this proposal I made here: Portal talk:Railways#Trains Portal and Railways Portal Merger Proposal. Jackdude101 (Talk) 19:21, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Caseyjonz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

First Transcontinental Railroad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hell on wheels
History of the Union Pacific Railroad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hell on wheels
Railway town (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hell on wheels

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Mine Hill Railroad" & "Mine Hill and Schuylkill Haven Railroad"

Sir, greetings from the Netherlands (so: excuse my english). As I am trying to read Friedrich List's works on railroads, I stumbled on this: Pennsylvanian law, Act 46 >Incorperation of Minehill Railroad and Canal Company< ("Incorporirung der Minehill-Eisenbahn- und Canal-Gesellschaft"). Now, I did find in the english wiki the redirecting page "Mine Hill Railroad" → "Lehigh and Hudson River Railway". Surmising this is not the one I'm looking for, I found using a search-programm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Trains/ICC_valuations/Mine_Hill_and_Schuylkill_Haven_Railroad . Perhaps you could and would edit the english wiki, and make a disambiguation-page? Albeit I do not know more about the "Mine Hill and Schuylkill Haven Railroad" so it will be a "reddend link" / page does not exist - unfortunately. The >MHaSHR< IS often mentionned in the english wiki. Greetings, Stan 77.171.92.12 (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]