User talk:112.211.214.39

Welcome!

Hello, 112.211.214.39, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

WP:BRD

Please review this guideline, and refrain from repeating your edit on Judaism and sexuality, in whatever form, till you establish a consensus for it on the talkpage. Debresser (talk) 23:23, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I already give you a nice warning. Now it is time for a less nice one:

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Hello, 112.211.214.39. You have new messages at Debresser's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Debate between Winter and Summer

Please don't link every myth. It would become a mess. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 06:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Eridu, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:54, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:uw-disrupteve2|Eridu}} Jim1138 (talk) 08:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Eridu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Debate between sheep and grain, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:04, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Debate between Winter and Summer. Jim1138 (talk) 08:06, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=@Materialscientist:, I was not vandalizing the articles. Read the articles and you will see that they are all relevant to each other. @Jim1138: mistakenly believed that the Cain and Abel article is not related to the other myths, which just isn't true, as a quick read of the articles will prove. Dilmun and Garden of Eden are connected as well. Jim's accusations of vandalism are baseless, and probably accused me out of nothing but "good ol' reliabl" feels. He probably is not too familiar with ancient near Eastern mythology, and mistakenly believed me to be a fringe crackpot trying to insert nonsense, which is a belief that can be disproved by just reading the articles. 
If you still do not believe me, just ask @PaleoNeonate:. At the edit history of the Sumerian creation myth article, he agreed with me on my assertion on the relevance of the Genesis flood to the Sumerian creation myth.112.211.214.39 (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2017 (UTC)  ~~~~}}

. [reply]

Materialscientist (talk) 08:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.