User talk:BSOleader

Vandal-tagging

Thanks for helping clean up from vandals on various articles, and tracking the vandal accounts themselves! However, you don't have the ability to ban or block editors, and placing block/ban tags on editors that aren't is confusing to everyone else. You can report vandals to WP:AIV for administrative action. DMacks (talk) 09:23, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, thanks anyway, least I will know for next time. BSOleader (talk) 09:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Distributed Annotation System

I'm not sure what is achieved by moving the page to a draft page with a redirect. Rathfelder (talk) 21:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed speedy deletion tags and notices you added

Hi. I have removed a few speedy deletion tags and notices you added to some pages. Please note that:

For an article to qualify for G1 (nonsense), it must consist entirely of incoherent text or gibberish. G1 does not cover poor writing, obscene remarks, implausible theories, coherently-written text that is vandalism or a hoax, fictional material, coherently-written non-English material, or poorly translated material.

For an article to qualify for A3 (no content), it must either be blank, consist of only a repeat or rephrasing of the title, reflist, see also section or category tags etc. It does not cover stubs which provide sufficient context to identify their subjects.

Speedy deletion notification notices must only be placed on the user talk pages of creators or substantial contributors, not WikiProject talk pages or any other pages.

Thank you. Linguist¹ 1 ¹ 22:37, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks, understood BSOleader (talk) 22:40, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

Why did you notify me about the deletion of an article which I've never edited? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah sorry that was a mistake, not sure how that happened.BSOleader (talk) 16:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:David Vialls.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:David Vialls.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 22:33, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: French Sixth Republic (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Domdeparis was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a suggestion that comes up regularly from candidates such as Melenchon Hamon, and Le Pen. I live in France and I have never heard of the slightest suggestion that Macron would establish a 6th republic. try reading this article from Le Monde that says "Pour Emmanuel Macron, aussi, il n’est pas nécessaire de changer ou réviser la Constitution de la Ve République." For Emmanuel Macron too, there is no need to change or revise the constitution of the 5th republic" [1] So no this article is totally false and smacks of WP:OR

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:French Sixth Republic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Domdeparis (talk) 14:44, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! BSOleader, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Domdeparis (talk) 14:44, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Citybound for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Citybound is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citybound until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 16:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of William Perkin Church of England High School

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on William Perkin Church of England High School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Domdeparis (talk) 16:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Perkin Church of England High School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Perkin Church of England High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Perkin Church of England High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 18:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]