Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Sehil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gisèle Latueva (talk | contribs) at 21:07, 13 October 2017 (→‎John Sehil). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

John Sehil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article does not meet the WP:NACTOR guidelines -- Habertix (talk) 12:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 12:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 12:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom.Tipsygunny (talk) 22:33, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The notability standard is met by the reliable and verifiable sources provided. PapiLombardo (talk)
  • KEEP The article was created in 2015 and has been modified by many Wikipedia contributors. John Sehil has played in films and television series for 11 years and has been credited several times in the credits. All the sources prove his participation as an actor. Gisèle Latueva (talk)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The arguments so far have been variations on "he's notable" / "he's not notable" - can people expand on this?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I suspect sockpuppetry...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 20:38, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In the process of filing I noticed that the nom had notified them all, so I do not question their motives for showing up. That they aren't the same person, however is a different question. L3X1 (distænt write) 13:49, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]