Talk:Side Effects (2013 film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Side Effects (2013 film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Film: American C‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Cinema C‑class

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York City C‑class

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

LGBTQ+ studies C‑class

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Durham University

Jude Laws's British psychiatrist character is described as having been educated at Durham University. An interesting piece of trivia is that this would be impossible: Durham has no medical or psychiatric department. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.24.204.126 (talk) 16:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Music

An editor removed the music section saying it wasn't notable enough. I'm not sure how to judge which soundtracks are notable enough to be included in film articles, so maybe someone who knows better might be able to restore and improve the section.

Without a Music section it didn't make any sense for the External links to include a link to a review of the soundtrack so I removed it. Even if the music section was restored the review shouldn't really be in the External links section anyway and instead should be used as a reference somewhere in the Music section.

Looking back through the edit History a review of the soundtrack was heavily quoted but that was removed for WP:COPYVIO and also Examiner.com isn't usually considered an acceptable source for Wikipedia articles anyway. Another review was also removed for Copyvio.

Maybe the soundtrack just isn't notable enough, but if anyone thinks it is and want's to try improving the article then hopefully they'll see that they don't need to start from scratch and that there are 2/3 reviews they can start with, so long as they don't quote too heavily and avoid Copyvio. -- 23:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)