Jump to content

Talk:Bridge to nowhere

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 192.65.245.230 (talk) at 15:05, 20 February 2018. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Italic text

WikiProject iconBridges and Tunnels List‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2003 comment

Spelling on this page is accurate, even tho there are variations such as Whanganui and Wanganui, and Maungapurua (official name today) and Mangapurua (in quoted text, name from old maps). Moriori 20:33, 6 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Knik Arm Bridge

I don't see how the Knik Arm Bridge falls under the defition of "Bridge to Nowhere." Seeing as it would connect Alaska's two most densely populated areas together. And according to their website they have roads already built at either end of the proposed site. "Bridge to nowhere" is a label used to attack the credibility of the bridge. (Dbcraft (talk) 17:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

No Mention of THE Bridge?

No mention of Palin's bridge to nowhere? This page is probably getting thousands of hits a day, like mine just now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.135.238.225 (talk) 15:07, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That would be the Gravina Island Bridge AlexWangombe (talk) 04:38, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Primary topic is Gravina Island Bridge?

It seems like the primary topic here is Gravina Island Bridge. I think this page should be moved to Bridge to Nowhere (disambiguation) and this should be turned into a redirect for Gravina Island Bridge. What does everyone else think? Is there another article that would make this not the clear primary topic? Thanks, — sligocki (talk) 07:00, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are more bridges leading to Nowhere

I think the content is too much of the English speaking countries. In the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, France and many other countries are many other bridges leading (from nowhere) to nowhere. By having a look at the Grote nutteloze werken you'll find some photos and discriptions. Given countries are just examples. Dqfn13 (talk) 12:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are a lot of American ones missing, too. (I can think of multiple on local freeways, for example.) I think this is just a very common thing and only structures notable enough to have Wikipedia pages will be listed. That inherently biases matters toward English-speaking countries. Calbaer (talk) 19:50, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Split Articles

To me, it seems that this article is a combination of two topics that are almost completely unrelated:

  1. Literal bridges to nowhere,
  2. Pork barrel spending in the form of bridges and similar projects that only benefit a small number of people.

I suggest that we split this into two separate articles. henry42 (talk) 02:20, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guthrie Theater & Kirk Essary

I can find no record of Guthrie Theater director Kirk Essary or this tunnel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JRioBales (talkcontribs) 17:39, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

A particular user seems very obsessed with undoing my edits. First, I've been told that blogs were not to be used. So I've changed it. Now, he's undid the edits again, with no explanations provided. What is your frigging problem, dude? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.26.123.208 (talk) 06:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bridge to nowhere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Itz

I removed the Itztalbrücke because it is not a bridge to nowhere. Construction on the rail line continues apace, and the opening is now expected in a couple of months, December 2017. Listing a bridge built before the end of the construction of the project they are part of is just wrong. They can not possibly be considered bridges to nowhere in the sense of this article, as long as construction is ongoing. There was a 4-5 year pause in construction of this rail line, during which it was not clear if the project would ever be completed, but construction resumed 15 years ago. Nick Beeson (talk) 22:47, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brantwood Dr Overpass

Reason for the unused bridge is due to an local ordinance where the affluent residents of the neighborhood petitioned against it [1]