Jump to content

Talk:C++

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 96.250.126.152 (talk) at 03:14, 15 March 2018 (Added to wikiproject computing). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former good articleC++ was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 12, 2005Good article nomineeListed
March 19, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
September 8, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 27, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Delisted good article

Template:Find sources notice Template:Wikipedia CD selection

More criticism needed

Could we please have more criticism of C++'s many glaring issues. I feel that there's not enough criticism in general, and consider that at least 50% of the page should be devoted to it. Oecology (talk) 09:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's a recurring topic on this talk page. See for example
and especially
and
For what it's worth, there is a page Criticism of C++ devoted to that topic. – Tea2min (talk) 08:58, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Most of these criticism, and also those featured are basically POINTLESS. For example one criticism is that C++ is not reflective, but you CAN make your program reflective (with less than 100 lines of code, note) Criticizing the "lack of a library" is also pointless since new C++ libraries come out ALL THE TIME. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.69.199.255 (talk) 07:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism section and separate page

In anticipation of possible moves to remove my additions to the Criticism section, I'd like to say that the language complexity issues are in a whole different class than any issues mentioned on Criticism of C++. They are a fundamental design issue, not very technical or specific. Also, they are much more notable, sourced with a very high quality. 213.149.61.212 (talk) 06:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]