Talk:C++
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the C++ article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
|
C++ was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Template:Find sources notice Template:Wikipedia CD selection
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the C++ article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
More criticism needed
Could we please have more criticism of C++'s many glaring issues. I feel that there's not enough criticism in general, and consider that at least 50% of the page should be devoted to it. Oecology (talk) 09:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- That's a recurring topic on this talk page. See for example
- Talk:C++/Archive 1#criticism section?
- Talk:C++/Archive 2#Critisms section
- Talk:C++/Archive 6#Criticism of C++
- Talk:C++/Archive 6#More criticism of C++
- Talk:C++/Archive 7#Criticism of current criticism
- Talk:C++/Archive 7#Move out the criticisims and stick to language info
- Talk:C++/Archive 9#Criticisms sections are good!
- Talk:C++/Archive 10#Do we need this retarded criticism page?
- Talk:C++/Archive 10#Criticism
- Talk:C++/Archive 11#C++ FAQ vs FQA
- and especially
- and
- For what it's worth, there is a page Criticism of C++ devoted to that topic. – Tea2min (talk) 08:58, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Most of these criticism, and also those featured are basically POINTLESS. For example one criticism is that C++ is not reflective, but you CAN make your program reflective (with less than 100 lines of code, note) Criticizing the "lack of a library" is also pointless since new C++ libraries come out ALL THE TIME. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.69.199.255 (talk) 07:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Criticism section and separate page
In anticipation of possible moves to remove my additions to the Criticism section, I'd like to say that the language complexity issues are in a whole different class than any issues mentioned on Criticism of C++. They are a fundamental design issue, not very technical or specific. Also, they are much more notable, sourced with a very high quality. 213.149.61.212 (talk) 06:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Former good article nominees
- C-Class C/C++ articles
- Top-importance C/C++ articles
- C++ articles
- WikiProject C/C++ articles
- C-Class Computer science articles
- Mid-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- C-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- B-Class Microsoft articles
- Top-importance Microsoft articles
- WikiProject Microsoft articles