User talk:Mn1548

Mn1548, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mn1548! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Can't Hold Us Down

Since when is swedishcharts.com an official site to judge what is a single? It doesn't even state that it is a single. I've given a reference stating that the song was released in 2014 and if that reference isn't good enough I'll give a better one. The only one adding incorrect changes is you by putting it under 2015. AAron 8967 (talk) 09:54, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@AARON 8967: It archives the Swedish Charts (And other countries as well) therefore I think it's an official site to judge. They recorded it in 2014, doesn't mean it was released in 2014. Also if you scroll back far enough on Axwell Λ Ingrosso's Instagram you'll find the same information from the artists them selves!Mn1548 (talk) 11:04, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mn1548: If you go to 69 weeks ago on their instagram they have information saying it was released in 2014. The music video for Can't Hold Us Down was released in 2015. And if a song enters a chart it does not make it a single. The Swedish Charts doesn't say that it is. I've given two references saying it was released in 2014 from complex and google play and I'll give another one from dej jam the record company their signed to.

@AARON 8967: If a song is released separate from and album, then it is released as a "single" format!Mn1548 (talk) 20:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Stop using 90.194.233.120 (talk · contribs) to carry out contentious edits or I will report you for sockpuppetry, which is inappropriate use of multiple accounts. Do not add spaces between certifications and references, as you did at Little Mix discography. Also, stop adding The X Factor to the "Album" column; the column says Album. Same goes with your IP edits at Sam Smith discography. Spectre the film is not an album. By the way, I know you are Nathanaelsadgrove (talk · contribs) as well; you edit exactly the same topics and articles (and you also performed the same edit at Little Mix's discography concerning adding a TV series into the Album column). Ordinarily, using multiple accounts is not a problem but when you keep doing the things I and other users warned you not to, that's when there is and will be a problem. Ss112 12:16, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please ensure that you include a link to your previous account, User:Nathanaelsadgrove, on your user page. Without providing the link it gives the appearance that you are trying to avoid possible sanctions due to the number of warnings received under the Nathanaelsadgrove user name, which is contrary to our policies regarding multiple accounts.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: How would one do that?Mn1548 (talk) 18:47, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You could just add the link to your old user page (User:Nathanaelsadgrove) after "Old Account Broke:" on your new user page. I can do it for you if you're unsure.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: I mean code format, is it just the same as a standard page?Mn1548 (talk) 19:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just type [[User:Nathanaelsadgrove]] and save it. Sundayclose (talk) 19:04, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundayclose: Thank you Mn1548 (talk) 19:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mn1548. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Summertime Ball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raye. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please make sure the information in references you're deleting is contained in other references on the page. On Axwell and Ingrosso, you claimed in an edit summary that "individual peak chart positions refs are unnecessary as there are refs for the all peak chart positions at the top". The reference for the Flanders peak of "I Love You" is not in the reference at the top of the column, hence why I added it in the first place, so I have restored the reference. Do not remove it. Thank you. Ss112 16:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, thanks for fixing the mistake User:Mn1548

You claimed in your edit summary here "F.F.F." is a single and wrote "NOTE: Reference was included..." (cut off?) but yet you have provided no reference with your edit that indicates it is a single. The difference is "Galway Girl" and "Don't Let Me Be Yours" were both announced as singles. Has "F.F.F." been called a single? Ss112 19:21, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ss112 The rest of that was "...reference was included but it prevented the edit from saving, if anyone could find a reference that worked it would be much appreciated". By the way if my references that I tried to include (from Billboard and YouTube) are incorrect, please correct the edit. The song did following the same release as the songs mentioned (One after the album it's from but wasn't given its own one songed album) thus is and should be classed as a single. User:Mn1548

Ina Wroldsen

Ina Wroldsen was not credited on "How Deep Is Your Love", so it is not appropriate to include the song in her discography, and it's been removed. I'm pretty sure you've been warned about this practice before. For instance, Beyoncé quite notably had her vocals on Coldplay's "Hymn for the Weekend" but the song is not on her discography because she was not officially credited. Putting "uncredited" next to it does not excuse it. Ss112 00:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Schulz discography

I have moved the discussion to Talk:Robin Schulz discography, as it seems more appropriate for that page, as you are seeking changes to the page that may be controversial. Ss112 16:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:30, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Avicii discography. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.

Coldplay's songs did not gain those chart positions because Avicii remixed them. You're taking chart positions of songs that Avicii remixed after the fact, and attributing their success to Avicii. That's original research unless they are credited as being Avicii's remixes on sites. Do not reinstate said information to Avicii's discography without proof. This will be considered disruption and be reverted. If you want to reply, you can do so here, or discuss it on Talk:Avicii discography. There is no need to open a duplicate topic on my talk page. Ss112 15:28, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: Firstly, I never credited an Avicii remix of a Coldplay song; and secondly, I put no chart positions on the remix part of the table I split.

However regarding the production table, surely those songs got there chart positions and certifications due to all the production and songwriting that went into making the song. My intent was to add the chart positions and certifications of those songs like in the rest of the discography. Note: I was unable to find an overall reference for the chart positions as the credit artists were different but references for the certifications were there and for Avicii producing the songs. Please tell me if given chart positions for production credits is a "no" for the reason that finding overall chart references are hard, or for any other reason as the no original research policy doesn't really say anything against as as the cerdit of "producer" has been made clear. Mn1548 (talk) 17:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, my mistake: I meant you created an unsourced chart table for Avicii's production work. It's original research because there were no references. If you can't find references for material you're adding, you shouldn't be adding it. Full stop. You also added fake peaks of Devil Pray: it didn't reach number 3 in France, let alone any chart, and its peak in Sweden was number 16 on the Digital chart, not the overall singles chart. Ss112 17:46, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: OK. Charts and Certifications should be avoided for production credits. However I still think the table should be split and some songs removed as the apper in "As featured artist" as "Other charted songs". Mn1548 (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mn1548. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DNCE discography

The album column does not mean "which albums is the song included on?" because if it did mean that, every compilation a song subsequently appears on should be listed too. Is it for other discographies? No. It means which album or release (EP, mixtape, compilation, live album and so on) it was released in promotion of. The note was there for a reason. Don't come along and disregard it because you think you know better. Thanks. Ss112 00:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sebastian Ingrosso, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Everytime We Touch and Swedish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jackman Discography

Hello. Spotify is a streaming media WP is an encyclopedia. We don't refer to backing vocals on the track list and no this has nothing to do with WP:OR. Plus in Edit warring it does not matter who and why started it you just need to avoid it. So if you still have problems discuss it here first before reverting. CerberaOdollam (talk) 13:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]