Jump to content

Talk:Barbary slave trade

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sorberino (talk | contribs) at 01:16, 9 July 2018 (→‎Hypocrisy). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPiracy Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article lies in the latitude of WikiProject Piracy, a crew of scurvy editors bound to sharpen up all Wikipedia's piracy-related articles. If you want to ship with us and help improve this and other Piracy-related articles, lay aboard the project page and sign on for a berth.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Piracy To-do:

Here are some tasks you can do to help with WikiProject Piracy:

WikiProject iconMorocco Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Morocco, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Morocco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Help expand the project:

You can help! يمكنكم أن تساهموا


Paragraph on "Origins" needs a cleanup

Especially last two sentences. Is "reputed" actually the concept that the writer of the article meant? Perhaps "known for piracy" would be better? I hesitate to make the change, not knowing either the original author's intent or the history well enough to correct anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FurnaldHall (talkcontribs) 02:00, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WTF?

What is this racism on wikipedia? Everyone knows that whites were NEVER slaves! This article needs to be deleted!2601:806:4301:C100:5D7F:9053:2B22:55B (talk) 21:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources say otherwise. If you think "whites" were somehow exempt, please cite your sources for that claim. "Everyone knows" isn't a valid argument. Kleuske (talk) 09:58, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Someone seems unable to recognize sarcasm... Just another "white oppression" conspiracy theorist type who thinks slave trades involving whites are deliberately covered up by some nebulous "white genocide agenda". The article is fine, nobody thinks it's "racist".

See Wikipedia:Sarcasm is really helpful. If you have sources to back that claim, please present them. Otherwise, please remember Wikipedia is not a forum. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 10:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't have sources to back up his claim because he is not sincerely making the claim that "whites were NEVER slaves". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.189.184 (talk) 20:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Whites were never slaves. Only blacks. This article is racist and takes away from the seriousness of slavery!2601:806:4301:C100:935:8444:468D:CC39 (talk) 22:25, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody is saying this article is racist, nobody is trying to cover up the Barbary Slave Trade, stop pretending to be oppressed. If you have any useful information to contribute to this article by all means provide some credible sources and help develop it. If you're just here to cry about conspiracy theories you are not contributing information that will help develop this article.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.48.174 (talk) 15:15, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blacks weren't only slaves. You clearly don't know shit about history if you think blacks were the only group of people enslaved. Yellowgirl44x44 (talk) 21:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undercurrent of Offence

It's also somewhat present in almost all pages on slavery. However, Wikipedia should be objective.207.161.196.71 (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any specific complaints about the article (or other articles), or are you being offended in general? Kleuske (talk) 12:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please point out specific paragraphs you feel are subjective so they can be reviewed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.48.174 (talk) 15:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Barbary slave trade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hypocrisy

Blue-eyed blondes have always been enslaved by the Mediterranean, this only stopped in the 5th century during the period of barbarian invasions. Anyway it is Whites enslaving Whites no matter if they are Phoenicians, Greeks, Romans, Ottomans, Berbers etc. Also, many of those slaves were captured and sold by the Germans themselves — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sorberino (talkcontribs) 01:12, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]