Jump to content

Talk:Pearl Jam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chandra Shekher Mishra (talk | contribs) at 08:53, 11 September 2018 (→‎Pearl Jam is one of the greatest band ever: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Featured articlePearl Jam is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 22, 2008.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 5, 2005Good article nomineeListed
March 23, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 20, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 22, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 1, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
September 24, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

"Traditional" Music Industry Practices

The introduction segment refers to the bands refusal to adhere to "traditional" music industry practices. Surely, considering the diversity and ever-changing nature of music as an art form and the changing nature of the music industry itself (e.g. as new media forms are introduced and the industry changes to reflect these media, such as the advent of CDs, replacing cassettes, and the mp3, which threatens to wipe out compact disc technology), this should be referred to as "contemporary" music industry practices and not "traditional" music industry practices. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Upmeath (talkcontribs) 00:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

I began a discussion recently suggesting that bands should only have members subpages if they have had large numbers of line-up changes. I don't believe that having a members subpage for this band is necessary, as there are only two former members, a lot of the information there can already be found at the main article, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The touring members can simply be listed in the band members section, and there's then no arguing over where the timeline should belong. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 00:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pearl Jam is one of the greatest band ever

Well i have been trying to give some of very vintage and legendary bands the respect they deserve by contributing to wikipedia for some days as i have pretty good knowledge about this field. But some people's are interfering these, reverting my edits even though i give all the necessary proofs(citations). So i ask for your opinions as well as support on this matter. Chandra Shekher Mishra (talk) 08:53, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]