Jump to content

Talk:Blaa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dona seel (talk | contribs) at 15:33, 24 September 2018 (→‎Is it a Bap?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconFood and drink Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Food and Drink task list:
To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconIreland Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Luncheon meat is actually one of the more common fillings for blaas. And one of the most popular types is commonly referred to as Red Lead in Waterford due to its distinct red colour. That edit by User 193.1.57.1 is accurate. --Jmccormac 10:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC) This just looks like a floury bap. Hardly a waterford speciality.--194.145.134.26 17:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It may look like that but it does not taste like a bap and it does not have the texture of a bap.--Jmccormac 10:54, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What happened with the NPOV in this article. It's not very encyclopaedic to call it "delicious". --87.196.83.72 20:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to de-POV it; without any reliable sources, this should probably be a redirect. --John 19:27, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tayto cheese and onion crisps is also a popular filling in a Blaa —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eamodaly (talkcontribs) 11:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not a Bap

″Blaas are sometimes confused with a similar bun known as a bap, however, Blaas are square in shape, softer and doughier, and are most notably identified by the white flour shaken over them before the baking process.″

Trying to highlight the differences between a blaa and a bap, not call them the same thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.231.158.157 (talk) 15:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Journal link cited refers to the Blaa as a "Waterford Bap". The title is wrong. It is best to replace it with a citation from something more accurate. Jmccormac (talk) 22:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a Bap?

What is it about a blaa what doesn't met these definitions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.171.175.194 (talk) 16:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to add

I think we should change the opening line to "A blaa /blɑː/, or Waterford Blaa, is a doughy, white bap"

It is not a bap. Jmccormac (talk) 15:20, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Can you cite anything? Just sounds like a POV at the moment!
In particular, I'd like to know why it doesn't meet any of the definitions above?

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blaa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]