User talk:Mwright1469

Vandalism

When an editor challenges your additions, you're supposed to discuss, per WP:BRD. Accusing the editor of vandalism will not advance your case. And calling my advice "harassment" won't either. Dicklyon (talk) 06:23, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Your recent edits are functionally indistinguishable from trolling, as I evaluate them. Please spend two weeks pondering how to contribute positively to the world's #5 website, or else please consider blogging elsewhere. If any adminstrator thinks that I have misunderstood this editor's contributions, please feel free to unblock without my further input. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:34, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriate action. I would still like an answer to the question you ignored regarding Beyond My Ken: what were you suggesting when you said "Looking through your contributions I think you should focus on editing pages like the Alt-right and Holocaust denial". IWI (chat) 06:45, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good block, Cullen. Mwright1469's persistent silly condescension to BMK is considerably more uncivil than anything BMK has said, and obviously calculated to provoke. Bishonen | talk 10:16, 31 December 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Bishonen Please refrain from gravedancing. Wikipedia is not a social network website or forum. Thank you.

Your block

With Cullen's permission, I've reduced your block to 48 hours. You can start editing again then (if you want to), but please be circumspect. Deb (talk) 15:52, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]