User talk:HawkEggz
Welcome!
|
Paid editing
Hi @HawkEggz: Under Wikipedia Terms of Use any editor who is being paid to write or update an article, must confirm that they are a paid editor per WP:PAID and WP:DISCLOSURE. Any editor who is being paid and doesn't disclose risks indefinite blocking. scope_creepTalk 10:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi @Scope creep: the disclosure was already made on my user page in Nov 2015. Is there an issue with that now? -- HawkEggz (talk) 06:03, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry @HawkEggz: It is usually a paid silver template I was looking for. I never saw it. Thanks. scope_creepTalk 09:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Scope creep: by the way, are there issues with Apical Group? I've updated with third party citations after feedback from other contributors. Been trying to clean up the old PR language. Flagging it for deletion is a little over-the-top, no? Thanks!
Nomination of Apical Group for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apical Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apical Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creepTalk 10:52, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- @scope_creep: What are the grounds for deletion specific to the page? There have been third party sources added. Thanks. -- HawkEggz