Jump to content

User talk:HawkEggz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HawkEggz (talk | contribs) at 09:47, 11 April 2019 (Paid editing). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, HawkEggz! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 01:40, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Hi @HawkEggz: Under Wikipedia Terms of Use any editor who is being paid to write or update an article, must confirm that they are a paid editor per WP:PAID and WP:DISCLOSURE. Any editor who is being paid and doesn't disclose risks indefinite blocking. scope_creepTalk 10:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Scope creep: the disclosure was already made on my user page in Nov 2015. Is there an issue with that now? -- HawkEggz (talk) 06:03, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @HawkEggz: It is usually a paid silver template I was looking for. I never saw it. Thanks. scope_creepTalk 09:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Scope creep: by the way, are there issues with Apical Group? I've updated with third party citations after feedback from other contributors. Been trying to clean up the old PR language. Flagging it for deletion is a little over-the-top, no? Thanks!

Nomination of Apical Group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apical Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apical Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creepTalk 10:52, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@scope_creep: What are the grounds for deletion specific to the page? There have been third party sources added. Thanks. -- HawkEggz