Talk:Taxonomy of Narcissus

Taxonomy of Narcissus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 3, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Plants GA‑class Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Taxonomy of Narcissus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Fredlyfish4 (talk · contribs) 00:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Comments

Avoid saying things like "in the current century" as in the lead. Use specific dates, range of years, century, etc.

Done date inserted --Michael Goodyear (talk) 13:13, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly does "escape" refer to in the lead?

Done the same as in the text, escape from cultivation and subsequent naturalisation, a technical term in the evolution of speciation. Clarified. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 13:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who accepted 160 species? All these other figures talked about with their authors, but not this one.

Done Adrian Haworth. Attributed now --Michael Goodyear (talk) 15:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This looks good overall. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 02:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated "Names and etymology" sections

Both the Narcissus (plant) and Taxonomy of Narcissus articles have a "Names and etymology" section (here and here respectively). Any chance these could be combined to avoid duplication? Please discuss at Talk:Narcissus (plant) if you care. — AjaxSmack 15:27, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]